The DOI matches its Crossref record; 21 of the 21 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar
Open accessAbstract
In this paper, I argue that there are fundamental common features shared by interaction and grammar that suggest some kind of interdependence between the two and a nonautonomy of the language faculty; one of these fundamental common features is that of ‘projectability’. Human interaction rests on the possibility of projection; the grammars of human languages provide interlocutors with sedimentated and shared ways of organizing them. Empirical evidence for this view comes from structural homologies between action projection and grammatical projection. In particular, it is shown (on the basis of conversational examples from German) that in both cases: (1) the strength of the projective force can vary; (2) emerging gestalts can be framed by weakly projecting introductions; (3) projections can be interrupted; (4) full gestalts can be expanded; and (5) projections can be abandoned. The projectability of syntactic as well as sequence structures suggests an approach to syntax that takes into account the temporal unfolding of speech in time. It also suggests looking at the indeterminate areas between syntax and conversational structure in which the borderline between grammar and interaction can only be drawn on an ad hoc basis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve?
Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N., & Fitch, W. T. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.298.5598.1569 · Cited by 5,189
Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction
Schegloff, E. A. (1996) · Interaction and Grammar · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620874.002 · Cited by 1,615
Natural language and natural selection
Pinker, S., & Bloom, P. (1990) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00081061 · Cited by 1,330
Ford, C. E., & Thompson, S. A. (1996) · Interaction and Grammar · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620874.003 · Cited by 979
On the syntax of sentences-in-progress
Lerner, G. H. (1991) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500016572 · Cited by 933
Haiman, J. (1978) · Language · doi:10.1353/lan.1978.0009 · Cited by 810
Preliminaries to Preliminaries: “Can I Ask You a Question?”
Schegloff, E. A. (1980) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/j.1475-682x.1980.tb00018.x · Cited by 691
Lerner, G. H. (1996) · Interaction and Grammar · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620874.005 · Cited by 681
The construction of units in conversational talk
SELTING, M. (2000) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500004012 · Cited by 527
Cited by
The clause as a locus of grammar and interaction
Thompson, S. A., & Couper-Kuhlen, E. (2005) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445605054403 · Cited by 340
Mondada, L. (2006) · Discourse Studies · doi:10.1177/1461445606059561 · Cited by 317
Elaborations on L2 interactional competence: the development of L2 grammar-for-interaction
Pekarek Doehler, S. (2018) · Classroom Discourse · doi:10.1080/19463014.2018.1437759 · Cited by 157
Turns and turn-taking in sign language interaction: A study of turn-final holds
Groeber, S., & Pochon-Berger, E. (2014) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2013.08.012 · Cited by 69
Speech Planning at Turn Transitions in Dialog Is Associated With Increased Processing Load
Barthel, M., & Sauppe, S. (2019) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12768 · Cited by 42
Metadata
- Authors
- Auer, P.
- Venue
- Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse
- Publisher
- Walter de Gruyter GmbH
- Published
- 2005-01-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0165-4888 (ISSN-L)
- 1613-4117
- OpenAlex
- W1965316625
- Cited by
- 577
- References
- 21
- FWCI
- 127.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7
- The paper
- Auer, P. (2005). Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar. Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse. https://doi.org/10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.