The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence
Abstract
Studies of talk-and-bodily-conduct-in-interaction have inspired new insights into the way in which language, interaction and cognition might be articulated. More particularly, they have shown that participants mutually orient to the finely tuned multimodal details by which talk and action in interaction are sequentially organized. This article deals with this form of ‘participants’ multimodal online analysis’ by focusing on a particular phenomenon - the methodical practices and resources by which the end of a turn and of an activity phase is projected and collectively achieved - in a specific videorecorded setting - a meeting in an architect’s office. It aims at questioning both how these local orientations are systematically displayed and exploited by the participants for the sequential organization of their activity and how they can be demonstrably observed by the analyst.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974) · Language · doi:10.2307/412243 · Cited by 11,350
Journal of Consciousness Studies
(2022) · Journal of Consciousness Studies · doi:10.53765/20512201 · Cited by 6,832
Perspectives on socially shared cognition.
(1991) · American Psychological Association eBooks · doi:10.1037/10096-000 · Cited by 3,446
Action and embodiment within situated human interaction
Goodwin, C. (2000) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/s0378-2166(99)00096-x · Cited by 3,073
Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers
Goodwin, C. (1981) · Cited by 2,305
Repair After Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation
Schegloff, E. A. (1992) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229903 · Cited by 1,820
Turn organization: one intersection of grammar and interaction
Schegloff, E. A. (1996) · Interaction and Grammar · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511620874.002 · Cited by 1,615
Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word
HARNESS GOODWIN, M., & GOODWIN, C. (1986) · Semiotica · doi:10.1515/semi.1986.62.1-2.51 · Cited by 793
Projection in Interaction and Projection in Grammar
Auer, P. (2005) · Text - Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse · doi:10.1515/text.2005.25.1.7 · Cited by 577
The construction of units in conversational talk
SELTING, M. (2000) · Language in Society · doi:10.1017/s0047404500004012 · Cited by 527
Cited by
The local constitution of multimodal resources for social interaction
Mondada, L. (2014) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2014.04.004 · Cited by 536
Self-citationMondada, L. (2019) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2019.01.016 · Cited by 490
Self-citationMultimodal interaction from a conversation analytic perspective
Deppermann, A. (2013) · Journal of Pragmatics · doi:10.1016/j.pragma.2012.11.014 · Cited by 262
Processing language in face-to-face conversation: Questions with gestures get faster responses
Holler, J., Kendrick, K. H., & Levinson, S. C. (2018) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1363-z · Cited by 167
Kendrick, K. H. (2015) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00250 · Cited by 92
Metadata
- Authors
- Mondada, L.
- Venue
- Discourse Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 117-129
- ISSN
- 1461-4456 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7080
- OpenAlex
- W2151664961
- Cited by
- 317
- References
- 20
- FWCI
- 55.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1461445606059561
- The paper
- Mondada, L. (2006). Participants’ online analysis and multimodal practices: projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445606059561
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
