Cited by 169Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sorafenib: a clinical and pharmacologic review

Iyer, Renuka, Fetterly, Gerald, Lugade, Amit, Thanavala, Yasmin·2010·Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Importance of the field Sorafenib is an oral receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits Raf serine/threonine kinases and receptor tyrosine kinases (vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, 3 and platelet-derived growth factor-beta, Flt-3 and c-kit) that are implicated in tumorigenesis and tumor progression. Sorafenib is approved for the treatment of advanced inoperable hepatocellular cancer and advanced renal cell cancer. Areas covered in this review The findings from the major Phase III studies that led to FDA approval of this drug for the above indications are reviewed. Key aspects of sorafenib pharmacology, dosing in the presence of organ dysfunction, toxicities and weaknesses of the research done so far are summarized. What will the reader gain The reader will have the knowledge of the major studies that form the basis of the clinical use of sorafenib, information on the upcoming Phase III trials that could lead to changes in clinical practice and some insights on aspects of the drugs' mechanism of action and toxicity that still remain unclear. Take home message Sorafenib is a well-tolerated oral antiangiogenic agent approved for treatment of two angiogenesis-driven cancers. Studies to broaden the clinical indications and increase understanding of the clinical and laboratory biomarkers of response are needed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14656566.2010.496453

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sorafenib is well tolerated in cirrhotic patients and inhibits several tyrosine kinases (e.g. VEGF, PDGFR, ERK/AKT, Ras, etc.) and their downstream oncogenic pathways.

    “The only FDA-approved drug for advanced HCC, sorafenib is well tolerated in cirrhotic patients (2) and inhibits several tyrosine kinases (e.g. VEGF, PDGFR, ERK/AKT, Ras, etc.), and their downstream oncogenic pathways (35).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 48

  1. Wilhelm S, 2006, Nat Rev Drug Discov, 5, 835, 10.1038/nrd2130 · DOI
  2. Wilhelm SM, 2008, Mol Cancer Ther, 7, 3129, 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-08-0013 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/sj.onc.1208841 · DOI
  4. Himmelsbach K, 2009, Gut, 58, 1644, 10.1136/gut.2009.182212 · DOI
  5. Molhoek KR, 2009, Cancer Immunol Immunother, 58, 867, 10.1007/s00262-008-0602-6 · DOI
  6. Strumberg D, 2005, J Clin Oncol, 23, 965, 10.1200/JCO.2005.06.124 · DOI
  7. Richly H, 2004, Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 42, 650, 10.5414/CPP42650 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/annonc/mdl017 · DOI
  9. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-2889 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.ejca.2006.08.032 · DOI
  11. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0382 · DOI
  12. Flaherty KT, 2008, Clin Cancer Res, 14, 4836, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-4123 · DOI
  13. 10.2146/ajhp080436 · DOI
  14. Widemann BC, 2009, J Clin Oncol, 27, 15s, 10.1200/JCO.2008.21.7695 · DOI
  15. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.0931 · DOI
  16. Rey PM, 2008, Oncology, 74, 245, 10.1159/000151394 · DOI
  17. Hilger RA, 2009, Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther, 47, 61, 10.5414/CPP47061 · DOI
  18. Blanchet B, 2010, Expert Opin Drug Saf, 9, 275, 10.1517/14740330903510608 · DOI
  19. Escudier B, 2007, N Engl J Med, 356, 125, 10.1056/NEJMoa060655 · DOI
  20. Escudier B, 2009, J Clin Oncol, 27, 3312, 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.5511 · DOI
  21. Ratain MJ, 2006, J Clin Oncol, 24, 2505, 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.6723 · DOI
  22. Ivy SP, 2009, Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 6, 569, 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.130 · DOI
  23. Llovet JM, 2008, J Natl Cancer Inst, 100, 698, 10.1093/jnci/djn134 · DOI
  24. Escudier B, 2007, Ann Oncol, 18, 90, 10.1093/annonc/mdm301 · DOI
  25. Bukowski R, 2007, Am J Clin Oncol, 30, 220, 10.1097/01.coc.0000258732.80710.05 · DOI
  26. Escudier B, 2009, J Clin Oncol, 27, 1280, 10.1200/JCO.2008.19.3342 · DOI
  27. Himmelsbach K, 2009, Gut, 58, 1644, 10.1136/gut.2009.182212 · DOI
  28. Dumont FJ, 1998, J Immunol, 160, 2579, 10.4049/jimmunol.160.6.2579 · DOI
  29. Hipp MM, 2008, Blood, 111, 5610, 10.1182/blood-2007-02-075945 · DOI
  30. Alfaro C, 2009, Br J Cancer, 100, 1111, 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604965 · DOI
  31. Almand B, 2001, J Immunol, 166, 678, 10.4049/jimmunol.166.1.678 · DOI
  32. Serafini P, 2006, Semin Cancer Biol, 16, 53, 10.1016/j.semcancer.2005.07.005 · DOI
  33. Ko HJ, 2007, Cancer Res, 67, 7477, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-4639 · DOI
  34. Dannull J, 2005, J Clin Invest, 115, 3623, 10.1172/JCI25947 · DOI
  35. Ozao-Choy J, 2009, Cancer Res, 69, 2514, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4709 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Finke JH, 2008, Clin Cancer Res, 14, 6674, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-5212 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Cheng AL, 2009, Lancet Oncol, 10, 25, 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70285-7 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1038/nrclinonc.2009.4 · DOI
  39. Antoun S, 2010, J Clin Oncol, 28, 1054, 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.9730 · DOI
  40. Newell P, 2008, J Hepatol, 48, 858, 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.01.008 · DOI
  41. Printz C, 2009, Cancer, 115, 4646, 10.1002/cncr.24673 · DOI
  42. 10.1097/CAD.0b013e32832b2ea0 · DOI
  43. 10.1200/JCO.2009.22.0541 · DOI
  44. 10.1200/JCO.2008.20.4495 · DOI
  45. Egberts F, 2008, Onkologie, 31, 398, 10.1159/000137714 · DOI
  46. Lam ET, 2010, J Clin Oncol, 28, 2323, 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.0068 · DOI
  47. Abou-Alfa GK, 2006, J Clin Oncol, 24, 4293, 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.3441 · DOI
  48. Massard C, 2010, Ann Oncol, 21, 1027, 10.1093/annonc/mdp411 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Iyer, R., Fetterly, G., Lugade, A., & Thanavala, Y.
Affiliations
Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center (US)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Published
2010-06-30
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
1943-1955
ISSN
  • 1465-6566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7666
OpenAlex
W2060370107
Cited by
169
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 18 · 2012: 17
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Angiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
Keywords
sorafenib, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, Raf kinase inhibitor, hepatocellular carcinoma, renal cell carcinoma, anti-angiogenic therapy, vascular endothelial growth factor receptor, platelet-derived growth factor, FLT3, CD117, drug toxicity, treatment response biomarkers
MeSH terms
Sorafenib, Adult, Antineoplastic Agents, Benzenesulfonates, Child, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Niacinamide, Phenylurea Compounds, Pyridines, United States, United States Food and Drug Administration, Drug Approval, Protein Kinase Inhibitors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review