Cited by 41Hormonal Regulation and HypertensionRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Aldosterone receptor blockers spironolactone and canrenone: Two multivalent drugs

Open access
Armanini, Decio, Sabbadin, Chiara, Donà, Gabriella, Clari, Giulio, Bordin, Luciana·2014·Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy

Abstract

Canrenone is a derivative of spironolactone with lower antiandrogen activity. The drug is used only in few countries and can block all the side effects of aldosterone (ALDO). The drug is effective even in the presence of normal concentrations of ALDO. Mineralcorticoid receptor antagonists block the inflammatory activity of ALDO at the level of target tissues as heart, vessels and mononuclear leukocytes. Canrenone reduces the progression of insulin resistance and of microalbuminuria in type 2 diabetes and other related diseases. Both canrenone and hydrochlorothiazide can enhance the effect of treatment with ACE inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers on microalbuminuria, but ALDO receptor blockers are more active. This different action is due to the fact that only canrenone blocks mineralocorticoid receptors. Serum potassium and renal function should be monitored before and during the treatment. ALDO receptor blockers are recommended in addition to polytherapy for resistant hypertension, but there are no studies on the effect of the drug as first-choice therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/14656566.2014.896901

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

This paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Armanini, D., Sabbadin, C., Donà, G., Clari, G., & Bordin, L.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy
Published
2014-03-11
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
909-912
ISSN
  • 1465-6566 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-7666
OpenAlex
W2130500198
Cited by
41
References
17
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
canrenone, spironolactone, aldosterone receptor blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, microalbuminuria, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, resistant hypertension, ACE inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, serum potassium, renal function
MeSH terms
Albuminuria, Aldosterone, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors, Canrenone, Humans, Hypertension, Inflammation, Insulin Resistance, Spironolactone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review