Cited by 69Computational Drug Discovery MethodsAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesProtein Structure and Dynamics

Approaches to efficiently estimate solvation and explicit water energetics in ligand binding: the use of WaterMap.

Yang, Yue, Lightstone, Felice C, Wong, Sergio E·2013·Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Water displacement plays critical role in several phases of drug discovery. Proper treatment of displacing water could improve enrichment in virtual screening and could lead to more successes in lead optimization. WaterMap has recently emerged as a promising approach in this regard; recent implementations of this protocol successfully explained various binding activity that were poorly understood previously, including the well-known super affinity associated with biotin binding to streptavidin. AREAS COVERED: The review briefly discusses implicit and explicit solvent models and focuses on an application of inhomogeneous solvation theory - WaterMap. Furthermore, the review discusses various successful cases where the use of WaterMap explained selectivity in protein-ligand binding and provides discussion of the fundamentals and recently successful implementations of WaterMap. The authors also discuss the limitations of this protocol and list a few approaches that could extend its implementation to more cases. EXPERT OPINION: WaterMap is a powerful tool for calculating the cost of desolvation for structural waters. In some cases, it proved useful in predicting relative binding free energy differences for congeneric ligands. The practical utility of WaterMap hinges in adequate application of the results in the context of all the thermodynamic contributions to binding. Potential improvements as well as integration into methods such like MM-GB/SA could extend its success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1517/17460441.2013.749853

Cites

96 of 96 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A water-mapping protocol based on post-trajectory analysis of explicit solvent MD uses inhomogeneous solvation theory and tries to predict the free energy cost of moving a water molecule from a protein hydration site into the bulk solvent.

    “An interesting approach is the use of a water-mapping protocol based on the post trajectory analysis of explicit solvent MD. This analysis is based on the inhomogeneous solvation theory and tries to predict the free energy cost of moving a water molecule from a protein hydration site into the bulk solvent (Yang et al., 2013).”

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, Y., Lightstone, F. C., & Wong, S. E.
Affiliations
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US)
Venue
Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery
Published
2013-01-04
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
277-287
ISSN
  • 1746-0441 (ISSN-L)
  • 1746-045X
OpenAlex
W2008870093
Cited by
65
References
96
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
0.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Opinion on Drug Discovery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
Keywords
solvation energy, structural water, protein-ligand binding, desolvation, binding free energy, virtual screening, biotin-streptavidin binding, binding selectivity, MM-GBSA, implicit solvent
MeSH terms
Ligands, Models, Molecular, Protein Binding, Solvents, Water

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review