Cited by 30Medication Adherence and ComplianceBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPharmacy and Medical Practices

The Effect of Group Psychoeducation Program on Medication Adherence in Patients with Bipolar Mood Disorders: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Rahmani, Farnaz, Ebrahimi, Hossein, Ranjbar, Fatemeh, Razavi, Seyed Sajjad, Asghari, Elnaz·2016·Journal of Caring Sciences

Abstract

Introduction: Medication nonadherence is highly prevalent in patients with bipolar disorders and often results in worsening disease prognosis. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of group psychoeducation on medication adherence in female patients with bipolar mood disorder type I. Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 76 patients with bipolar mood disorder admitted in female psychiatric wards of Razi teaching hospital, Tabriz, Iran. The participants were selected by convenience sampling method and were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. Patients in experimental group received 10 continuous 90 minutes sessions of psychoeducation, two times a week. Medication adherence was measured using the medicine check list and medication adherence rating scale (MARS) before and after intervention. Data analysis was performed with SPSS ver.13. Results: There was no significant difference between two groups regarding medication adherence before the intervention. After the study intervention, the mean scores of medication adherence check list and medication adherence rating scale in the experimental group were significantly higher than the control group. Conclusion: Since group psychoeducation was effective in improving patients' medication adherence, it could be recommended for psychiatric nurses to apply this intervention in the clinical setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15171/jcs.2016.030

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Psychoeducation has been shown to be helpful in teaching people about the important role the face plays in communication and social interaction.

    “However, psychoeducation has shown to be helpful in teaching people about the important role the face plays in communication and social interaction (Rahmani et al., 2016).”

    From A Novel Psychological Group Intervention Targeting Appearance-Related Distress Among People With a Visible Disfigurement (Inside Out): A Case Study (2023) · cites this paper as Rahmani et al., 2016

    The Materials and methods section describes psychoeducation sessions about bipolar disorder, treatment, and medication adherence. The Introduction and Discussion discuss treatment collaboration and social support, but neither addresses teaching people about the face’s role in communication or social interaction. Searches for that claim and for facial expressions found no supporting passage; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Fontaine KL Mental health nursing 6th ed 2008 UK Pearson
  2. [11]Buckley PF Foster AE Adherence to mental health treatment 1st ed 2009 New York Oxford University Press
  3. [35]Ebrahimi H Ranjbar F Namdar H Mosaffa F The effect of therapeutic relationship in schizopherenic pateints Journal of Urmia Nursing And Midwifery Faculty 2014 12 6 491 498 (Persian)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahmani, F., Ebrahimi, H., Ranjbar, F., Razavi, S. S., & Asghari, E.
Affiliations
Tabriz University of Medical Sciences (IR)
Corresponding author
Asghari, Elnaz
Venue
Journal of Caring Sciences
Published
2016-12-01
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
287-297
ISSN
2251-9920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2558351638
Cited by
30
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Caring Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Tabriz University of Medical Sciences
  • University of Tabriz
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmacology › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
Keywords
group psychoeducation, medication adherence, bipolar disorder, female patients, psychiatric nursing intervention, medication non-adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review