The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Team Training in the Skies: Does Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training Work?
Open accessAbstract
The aviation community has invested great amounts of money and effort into crew resource management (CRM) training. Using D. L. Kirkpatrick's (1976) framework for evaluating training, we reviewed 58 published accounts of CRM training to determine its effectiveness within aviation. Results indicated that CRM training generally produced positive reactions, enhanced learning, and promoted desired behavioral changes. However, we cannot ascertain whether CRM has an effect on an organization's bottom line (i.e., safety). We discuss the state of the literature with regard to evaluation of CRM training programs and, as a result, call for the need to conduct systematic, multilevel evaluation efforts that will show the true effectiveness of CRM training. As many evaluations do not collect data across levels (as suggested by D. L. Kirkpatrick, 1976, and by G. M. Alliger, S. I. Tannenbaum, W. Bennett, Jr., & H. Traver, 1997), the impact of CRM cannot be truly determined; thus more and better evaluations are needed and should be demanded.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.311 · Cited by 1,831 · cited 3×
“For example, Kraiger et al. (1993) expanded Kirkpatrick’s typology by arguing that learning is multidimensional and results in cognitive, affective, and skill-based learning outcomes.”
Background
Cited by
The Science of Training and Development in Organizations: What Matters in Practice
Salas, E., Tannenbaum, S. I., Kraiger, K., & Smith-Jentsch, K. A. (2012) · Psychological Science in the Public Interest · doi:10.1177/1529100612436661 · Cited by 1,104
Self-citationCommunicating scientific uncertainty
Fischhoff, B., & Davis, A. L. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1317504111 · Cited by 312
Industrial and Organisation Research on Self‐Regulation: From Constructs to Applications
Vancouver, J. B., & Day, D. V. (2005) · Applied Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00202.x · Cited by 190
The science of teams in the military: Contributions from over 60 years of research.
Goodwin, G. F., Blacksmith, N., & Coats, M. R. (2018) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/amp0000259 · Cited by 115
Metadata
- Authors
- Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Bowers, C. A., & Wilson, K. A.
- Venue
- Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 641-674
- ISSN
- 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
- 1547-8181
- OpenAlex
- W1971066463
- Cited by
- 371
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Team Training in the Skies: Does Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training Work? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1518/001872001775870386
- The paper
- Salas, E., Burke, C. S., Bowers, C. A., & Wilson, K. A. (2001). Team Training in the Skies: Does Crew Resource Management (CRM) Training Work? Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. https://doi.org/10.1518/001872001775870386
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
