Cited by 190Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorBehavioral Health and InterventionsWorkplace Health and Well-being

Industrial and Organisation Research on Self‐Regulation: From Constructs to Applications

Vancouver, Jeffrey B., Day, David V.·2005·Applied Psychology

Abstract

L’autorégulation rencontre actuellement du succès en psychologie industrielle et organisationnelle. Les travaux théoriques et empiriques englobent des processus allant de l’entrée dans l’organisation à la sortie et à la réembauche. Les interventions et les concepts clés de l’autorégulation dans le monde du travail sont recensés en insistant sur la validité interne et de construction. Quelques concepts comme l’efficacité personnelle et l’implication ont bénéficié d’un grand intérêt de la part des psychométriciens et semblent constituer des cibles de premier ordre lors des interventions. Néanmoins, ces concepts restent entachés d’hypothèses dont la validité n’est pas garantie. D’autres concepts, en particulier la rétroaction et la divergence, souffrent de significations sensiblement différentes dans la littérature sur l’autorégulation, ce qui nuit à la compréhension et à la communication entre les universitaires et les praticiens. On a lancé des interventions relevant des principes de l’autorégulation; celles‐ei ont ensuite étéévaluées avec sérieux: il est apparu qu’elles avaient un impact sur un ensemble de variables pertinentes du point de vue organisationnel comme l’amélioration des performances et la réduction de l’absentéisme. Malheureusement, les interventions sont rarement étudiées de façon détaúllée et systématique, ce qui ne permet pas de tirer des conclusions sur les aspects de l’intervention qui sont pertinents du point de vue de la causalité. La discussion insiste s…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00202.x

Cites

89 of 89 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Procrastination can also be caused by exaggerated optimism.

    “However, procrastination can also be caused by exaggerated optimism (Vancouver & Day, 2005), warranting cognitive restructuring and behavioral experiments that target cognitions resulting in ineffective time management and difficulties related to self-control (Vancouver, More, & Yoder, 2008)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 92 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vancouver, J. B., & Day, D. V.
Affiliations
  • Ohio University (US)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Vancouver, Jeffrey B.
Venue
Applied Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-03-21
Volume
54
Issue
2
Pages
155-185
ISSN
  • 0269-994X (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0597
OpenAlex
W2145442968
Cited by
190
References
92
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 17
FWCI
15.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Applied Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
self-regulation, self-regulation interventions, self-efficacy, goal commitment, feedback, discrepancy, personal effectiveness, work engagement, employee performance, absenteeism, construct validity, internal validity, theory-practice gap, employee turnover, employee well-being, employee motivation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review