Cited by 401Human-Automation Interaction and SafetySocial Robot Interaction and HRIUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation

Parasuraman, Raja, Wickens, Christopher D.·2008·Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

DOI 10.1518/001872008x312198

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: The authors discuss empirical studies of human-automation interaction and their implications for automation design. Background: Automation is prevalent in safety-critical systems and increasingly in everyday life. Many studies of human performance in automated systems have been conducted over the past 30 years. Methods: Developments in three areas are examined: levels and stages of automation, reliance on and compliance with automation, and adaptive automation. Results: Automation applied to information analysis or decision-making functions leads to differential system performance benefits and costs that must be considered in choosing appropriate levels and stages of automation. Human user dependence on automated alerts and advisories reflects two components of operator trust, reliance and compliance, which are in turn determined by the threshold designers use to balance automation misses and false alarms. Finally, adaptive automation can provide additional benefits in balancing workload and maintaining the user's situation awareness, although more research is required to identify when adaptation should be user controlled or system driven. Conclusions: The past three decades of empirical research on humans and automation has provided a strong science base that can be used to guide the design of automated systems. Application: This research can be applied to most current and future automated systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1518/001872008x312198

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Orienting of Attention
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 1×
“Whether information is relevant or not can be ambiguous, so a potential performance cost may occur if the cueing of the highest-priority target is imperfect (Posner, 1980; Metzger & Parasuraman, 2005).”
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction
(1993) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(93)90471-k · Cited by 5,592
Designing the user interface strategies for effective human-computer interaction
Shneiderman, B. (1998) · SIGB · doi:10.1145/25065.950626 · Cited by 4,680
Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554
Self-citation
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.844354 · Cited by 4,195 · cited 1×
“Parasuraman, Sheridan, and Wickens (2000) accordingly proposed an extension of the LOA concept to four information-processing stages: (a) information acquisition, (b) information analysis, (c) decision making, and (d) action, with each stage having its own LOA scale (for similar scales, see Endsley & Kaber, 1999; Ends…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Garg, A. X., Adhikari, N. K. J., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M. P., Devereaux, P. J., Beyene, J., Sam, J., & Haynes, R. B. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 · Cited by 2,936
Multiple resources and performance prediction
Wickens, C. D. (2002) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220210123806 · Cited by 2,621 · cited 1×
“…terms, the former are mediated by posterior brain regions (occipito-temporo-parietal cortex) and the latter by anterior areas (frontal cortex), with these brain regions possibly defining different mental resources (Para-suraman & Wilson, 2008 [this issue]; Wickens, 2002, 2008 [this issue]).”
Self-citation
Multiple Resources and Mental Workload
Wickens, C. D. (2008) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x288394 · Cited by 2,164
Self-citation
Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems
LEE, J., & MORAY, N. (1992) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139208967392 · Cited by 1,459

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

Ahlstrom, V., 2005, Human factors design guide (DOT/FAA/CT-02-11)
Bagheri, N., 2004, HPSAA, 54
Billings, C.E. & Woods, D.D. (1994). Concerns about adaptive automation in aviation systems. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 24-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crocoll, W.M., Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting
Dornheim, M., 1999, Aviation Week and Space Technology, 46
Hancock, P., Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
Hilburn, B., Jorna, P.G., Byrne, E.A. & Parasuraman, R. (1997). The effect of adaptive air traffic control (ATC) decision aiding on controller mental workload. In M. Mouloua & J. Koonce (Eds.), Human-automation interaction: Research and practice (pp. 84-91). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO)., 2007, Concept for operations of the next generation air transportation system (Vol. 2)
Lee, J.D., 1992, Ergonomics, 22, 671
10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · DOI · Paper page
Mouloua, M., Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 37th Annual Meeting
Mundra, A., 1989, A new automation aid for air traffic controllers for improving airport capacity (MP-89W00034)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)., 2008, National research announcement #IAFD
Opperman, R., 1994, Adaptive user support
Parasuraman, R., 2007, International Journal of Command and Control, 1, 43
Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M. & Hilburn, B. (1999). Adaptive aiding and adaptive task allocation enhance human-machine interaction. In M. W. Scerbo & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation technology and human performance: Current research and trends (pp. 119-123). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Riley, V.A., Proceedings of the World Aviation Congress and Exposition
Sarter, N., Woods, D. & Billings, C.E. (1997). Automation surprises. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed., pp. 1926-1943). New York: Wiley.
Sorkin, R.D., 1989, Human Factors Bulletin, 32, 3
U.S. Army., 2007, THAAD Theatre High Altitude Area Defense Missile System
Warwick, K., 2004, I, cyborg
Wickens, C.D., 2000, Imperfect and unreliable automation and its implications for attention allocation, information access and situation awareness (Tech. Rep. ARL-00-10/NASA-00-2)
Wickens, C.D., Paper presented at the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology
Wickens, C.D., 2008, Addressing the alert problem in air traffic control (Air Traffic Control Facilities Annual Report, FAA Grant #20070271)
Wickens, C.D., Imperfect reliability in unmanned airvehicle supervision and control

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 399

Months of monotony – moments of mayhem: Planning for the human role in a transitioning world of work
Hancock, P. A. (2020) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2020.1753260 · Cited by 9
From Task Allocation Towards Resource Allocation when Optimising Assembly Systems
Fasth, Å., Provost, J., Fabian, M., Stahre, J., & Lennartson, B. (2012) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2012.07.069 · Cited by 8
Supporting Dynamic Re-Planning In Multiple Uav Control: A Comparison of 3 Levels of Automation
Prinet, J. C., Terhune, A., & Sarter, N. B. (2012) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181312561095 · Cited by 8
Changes in driver glance behavior when using a system that automates steering to perform a low-speed parallel parking maneuver
Kidd, D. G., Reimer, B., Dobres, J., & Mehler, B. L. (2018) · Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.trf.2018.07.002 · Cited by 8
Improving human control of hazards in industry
Hassall, M. E. (2022) · Safety and Health at Work · doi:10.1016/j.shaw.2021.12.806 · Cited by 8
Driverless Dreams: Technological Narratives and the Shape of the Automated Car
Stayton, E. (2015) · Cited by 8
Editorial to the virtual Special Issue: Human-automation interaction in the workplace: A broadened scope of paradigms
Wesche, J. S., Langer, M., Sonderegger, A., & Landers, R. N. (2022) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2022.107335 · Cited by 11
Gaze-informed signatures of trust and collaboration in human-autonomy teams
Ries, A. J., Aroca-Ouellette, S., Roncone, A., & de Visser, E. J. (2025) · Computers in Human Behavior Artificial Humans · doi:10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100171 · Cited by 8
Enhancing Immersive Sensemaking with Gaze-Driven Recommendation Cues
Tahmid, I. A., North, C. L., Davidson, K., Whitley, K. N., & Bowman, D. A. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI) · doi:10.1145/3708359.3712103 · Cited by 7
Human-Automation Manufacturing Industry System: Current Trends and Practice
Mrugalska, B., Wyrwicka, M. K., & Zasada, B. (2016) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41983-1_13 · Cited by 7
Unlocking Trust and Acceptance in Tomorrow’s Ride: How In-Vehicle Intelligent Agents Redefine SAE Level 5 Autonomy
Demir, C., Meschtscherjakov, A., & Gärtner, M. (2024) · Multimodal Technologies and Interaction · doi:10.3390/mti8120111 · Cited by 7
Complex activities in an operations center
Brown, J. M., Greenspan, S. L., & Biddle, R. (2013) · ACM SIGCHI Symposium on Engineering Interactive Computing Systems (EICS) · doi:10.1145/2494603.2480310 · Cited by 7
Towards a Semantic Knowledge Base for Competency-Based Training of Airline Pilots
Dapica, R., & Peinado, F. (2021) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2021.08.124 · Cited by 7
How to Display Vehicle Information to Users of Automated Vehicles When Conducting Non-Driving-Related Activities
Dandekar, A., Mathis, L.-A., Berger, M., & Pfleging, B. (2022) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3546741 · Cited by 7
The Impact of Type and Level of Automation on Situation Awareness and Performance in Human-Robot Interaction
Schuster, D. M., Jentsch, F. G., Fincannon, T. D., & Ososky, S. (2013) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-39360-0_28 · Cited by 7
Air Traffic Control Separation Minima: Part 2 – Transition to a Trajectory-based System
Brooker, P. (2011) · Journal of Navigation · doi:10.1017/s0373463311000221 · Cited by 7
Cognitive and Organizational Challenges of Big Data in Cyber Defense
Gersh, J. R., & Bos, N. (2014) · doi:10.1145/2609876.2609878 · Cited by 7
Risk, Radiation, and Rationality
Wears, R. L. (2011) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.02.026 · Cited by 7
Situation Awareness in Command and Control
Grier, R. A. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511973017.053 · Cited by 8
Automation Reliability and Other Contextual Factors in Multi-UAV Operator Selection
Lin, J., Matthews, G., Wohleber, R. W., Chiu, C.-Y. P., Calhoun, G. L., Funke, G. J., & Ruff, H. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213601193 · Cited by 7
Tactile Spatial Guidance for Collision Avoidance in NextGen Flight Operations
Prinet, J. C., Wan, Y., & Sarter, N. B. (2016) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1541931213601069 · Cited by 7
Keeping the Driver in the Loop: The ‘Other’ Ethics of Automation
Banks, V. A., Shaw, E., & Large, D. R. (2018) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-96074-6_8 · Cited by 7
Describing Human-Automation Interaction in production
Mattsson, S., Fast–Berglund, Å., Berlin, C., & Stahre, J. (2012) · Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology) · Cited by 8
Command and Control of Teams of Autonomous Systems
Lange, D. S., Verbancsics, P., Gutzwiller, R. S., Reeder, J., & Sarles, C. (2012) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-34059-8_4 · Cited by 7
Examining clinicians’ fatigue in a pediatric emergency department
Ozkaynak, M., Smyth, H. L., Sarabia, C., Cook, P. F., Mistry, R. D., & Schmidt, S. K. (2025) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104465 · Cited by 6
Steuern wir oder werden wir gesteuert? Chancen und Risiken von Mensch-Technik-Interaktion
Jipp, M., & Steil, J. J. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-30882-7_3 · Cited by 6
Conflict Resolution Automation and Pilot Situation Awareness
Dao, A.-Q. V., Brandt, S. L., Bacon, L. P., Kraut, J. M., Nguyen, J. H., Minakata, K., Raza, H., & Johnson, W. W. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21669-5_56 · Cited by 6
The many faces of human operators in process control: a framework of analogies
Nachtwei, J. (2010) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639221003728609 · Cited by 6
The Development and Evaluation of Countermeasures to Tactile Change Blindness
Riggs, S. L., & Sarter, N. B. (2016) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720815625739 · Cited by 6
On the Bridges: Insight Into the Current and Future Use of Automated Systems as Seen by Royal Navy Personnel
Barrett-Pink, C., Alison, L., Maskell, S., & Shortland, N. D. (2019) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343419855850 · Cited by 5
How do conversational case-based reasoning systems interact with their users: a literature review
Hillig, S., & Müller, R. (2020) · Behaviour and Information Technology · doi:10.1080/0144929x.2020.1767207 · Cited by 7
Design of an optimal automation system: finding a balance between a human's task engagement and exhaustion
Klein, M. C. A., & van Lambalgen, R. M. (2011) · International Conference Industrial, Engineering & Other Applications Applied Intelligent Systems · doi:10.5555/2025816.2025827 · Cited by 6
Current Concepts and Trends in Human-Automation Interaction
Bustamante, E. A., Madhavan, P., Wickens, C. D., Parasuraman, R., Manzey, D., Bahner, J. E., Meyer, J., Bliss, J. P., Lee, J. D., & Rice, S. C. (2009) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120905300429 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
The “Old” Issues of the “New” Artificial Intelligence Systems in Professional Activities
Gamkrelidze, T., Zouinar, M., & Barcellini, F. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119808343.ch6 · Cited by 7
Single Pilot Commercial Operations A Study of the Technical Hurdles
Faber, A. (2013) · Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) · Cited by 6
A signal detection perspective on error and unfairness detection as a critical aspect of human oversight of AI-based systemsPreprint
Langer, M., Baum, K. L., & Schlicker, N. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/ke256 · Cited by 6
How explainable AI affects human performance: A systematic review of the behavioural consequences of saliency mapsPreprint
Müller, R. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/ms2kv · Cited by 6
Autonomy aweigh: Evaluation metrics and supporting seafarers’ basic psychological needs in energy-efficient route planning DSS
Zoubir, M., Gruner, M., Heidinger, J., Schwarz, B., Jetter, H.-C., & Franke, T. (2025) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104518 · Cited by 4
Artificial intelligence quotient framework for measuring human collaboration with artificial intelligence
Ganuthula, V. R. R., & Balaraman, K. K. (2025) · Discover Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s44163-025-00516-1 · Cited by 5
Assessing the Complex Interaction and Variations in Human Performance Using Nonmetrical Scaling Methods
Sträeter, O., & Arenius, M. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07167-1_22 · Cited by 5
Effects of false alarms and miscues of decision support systems on human–machine system performance: a study with airport security screeners
Huegli, D., Chavaillaz, A., Sauer, J., & Schwaninger, A. (2025) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2025.2453546 · Cited by 5
Stick Must Fall: Using Machine Learning to Predict Human Error in Virtual Balancing Task
Irina, Z., Zgonnikov, A., & Kanemoto, S. (2016) · IEEE ... International Conference on Data Mining workshops · doi:10.1109/icdmw.2016.0032 · Cited by 5
Enabling Human-Autonomy Teaming in Aviation: A Framework to Address Human Factors in Digital Assistants Design
Bjurling, O., Müller, H., Burgén, J., Bouvet, C. J., & Berberian, B. (2024) · Journal of Physics Conference Series · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2716/1/012076 · Cited by 5
Development of a face-to-face meeting capture and indexing process
Piorkowski, B. A., Evans, R. D., & Gao, J. X. (2011) · International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) · doi:10.1109/cscwd.2011.5960047 · Cited by 5
A Testbed for Investigating Task Allocation Strategies between Air Traffic Controllers and Automated Agents
Schurr, N., Good, R. P., Alexander, A. L., Picciano, P. M., Ganberg, G., Therrien, M., Beard, B. L., & Holbrook, J. B. (2010) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v24i2.18822 · Cited by 5
Effectiveness of Human Autonomy Teaming in Cockpit Applications
Strybel, T. Z., Keeler, J. N., Barakezyan, V., Alvarez, A., Mattoon, N., Vu, K. L., & Battiste, V. (2018) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-92046-7_39 · Cited by 5
Development of an Autonomous Manager for Dynamic Human-Machine Task Allocation in Operational Surveillance
Frame, M. E., Boydstun, A. S., & Lopez, J. S. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS) · doi:10.1109/ichms49158.2020.9209414 · Cited by 5
Resilience and Digital Transformation Challenges in Oil and Gas Integrated Operations
Henriqson, É., Rodrigues, F. S., Werle, N. J. B., Lando, F., Trancoso, R. D. S., & Fogaça, L. B. (2022) · Contributions to management science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85954-1_3 · Cited by 5
A Quest of Self-Explainability: When Causal Diagrams meet Autonomous Urban Traffic Manoeuvres
Schwammberger, M. (2021) · IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference Workshops (REW) · doi:10.1109/rew53955.2021.00035 · Cited by 5
Design Possibilities for Vehicle Roll Motions as Feedback for the Driver during Automated Driving
Cramer, S., Lange, A., Bültjes, S., & Klohr, J. (2017) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3131726.3131746 · Cited by 5
Preface to the Special Issue on Human Factors and Advanced Vehicle Automation: Of Benefits, Barriers, and Bridges to Safe and Effective Implementation
Horrey, W. J., & Lee, J. D. (2020) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820901542 · Cited by 5
Human Factors Considerations in Autonomous Lethal Unmanned Aerial Systems
Kiernan, K. M. (2015) · Scholarly Commons (Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University) · Cited by 4
Design a dynamic automation system to adaptively allocate functions between humans and machines
Bernabei, M., & Costantino, F. (2023) · IFAC-PapersOnLine · doi:10.1016/j.ifacol.2023.10.1509 · Cited by 4
How do the levels of automation in flight operations affect pilots’ cognitive workload, reaction time, and EEG brain waves in cruising flights?
Yiu, C. Y., Ng, K. K. H., Li, Q., & Yuan, X. (2024) · IEEE International Conference on Human-Machine Systems (ICHMS) · doi:10.1109/ichms59971.2024.10555620 · Cited by 4
Normative or Confirmative: Effects of Information Quality and Redundancy in Decision Support Systems
Yaakov, Y. B., Denisova, M., Mulugeta, F., & Meyer, J. (2024) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208241302787 · Cited by 4
Crash Countermeasures and Design of Safety
(2017) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-78635-221-720162019 · Cited by 4
From Human Automation Interactions to Social Human Autonomy Machine Teaming in Maritime Transportation
Dominguez-Péry, C., & Vuddaraju, L. N. R. (2020) · TDIT · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-64861-9_5 · Cited by 2
Künstliche Intelligenz in eignungsdiagnostischen Interviews
Langer, M., & Lazar, V. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-38720-4_14 · Cited by 4
Exploring Strategy Use in a Multiple-Task Environment: Effects of Automation Reliability and Task Properties
Chiu, S.-D., Cullen, R. H., Rogers, W., & Fisk, A. (2012) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/1071181312561450 · Cited by 4
Development of production cells with regard to physical and cognitive automation: A decade of evolution
Fasth, A., Mattsson, S., Fässberg, T., Stahre, J., Hoog, S., Sterner, M., & Andersson, T. (2011) · IEEE International Symposium on Assembly and Manufacturing · doi:10.1109/isam.2011.5942316 · Cited by 4
Collaboration and Decision-Making in Context
Filip, F. G., Zamfirescu, C.-B., & Ciurea, C. E. (2016) · Automation, collaboration, and e-services · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47221-8_1 · Cited by 4
Information processing in aviation
Wickens, C. D., Vidulich, M. A., & Tsang, P. S. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-420139-2.00002-2 · Cited by 4
Self-citation
An Integrated Framework for Crew - Centric Flight Operations
McDonald, N., Kay, A., Liston, P. M., Morrison, R., & Ryan, M. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20373-7_42 · Cited by 4
Measuring Interaction Using Levels of Automation over TIme
Mattsson, S., Fässberg, T., Stahre, J., & Fast–Berglund, Å. (2011) · Chalmers Publication Library (Chalmers University of Technology) · Cited by 4
Trust In Unmanned Driving System
Lee, J.-G., Gu, J., & Shin, D. (2015) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1145/2701973.2702023 · Cited by 4
Using Complementary ModelS-Based Approaches for Representing and Analysing ATM Systems' Variability
Martinie, C., Palanque, P. A., Pasquini, A., Ragosta, M., Rigaud, É., & Silvagni, S. (2012) · HAL · Cited by 4
Collision avoidance and semi-automation in electric rope shovel operation
Cloete, S., & Horberry, T. (2013) · Cited by 4
Steering Behavior with Different Levels of Automation Interventions for Avoiding Collisions During Lane Change
Muslim, H., & Itoh, M. (2018) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/smc.2018.00463 · Cited by 4
Towards Evolutionary Emergence
Bremer, J., & Lehnhoff, S. (2021) · Annals of Computer Science and Information Systems · doi:10.15439/2021f111 · Cited by 4
Design of an Optimal Automation System: Finding a Balance between a Human’s Task Engagement and Exhaustion
Klein, M. C. A., & van Lambalgen, R. M. (2011) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-21827-9_11 · Cited by 4
Human‐Agent Teaming on Intelligence Tasks ( HATIT ): A Testbed for Evaluating AI in Intelligence Analysis
Paletz, S. B. F., Kane, A. A., Diep, M. M., Nelson, T. M., Porter, A., & Vahlkamp, S. H. (2025) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.1272 · Cited by 3
Research on the influence and evaluation of manual operation performance of multifunctional operation panel considering interaction effect
Zhang, T.-M., Ren, J.-D., Sun, M., & Zheng, H. (2024) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.21047 · Cited by 3
Alignment in Decision-Making Attributes Predicts Trust and Delegation to AI Systems
Summerville, A. L., de Visser, E. J., McVay, J., Martí, L., Leung, A., & Widmer, C. L. (2025) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/15553434251390012 · Cited by 4
Theoretical Throughput Capacity: Capabilities of Human Information Processing during Multitasking
Camden, A. N. (2015) · CORE Scholar (Wright State University) · Cited by 3
User interface solutions for supporting operators' automation awareness in nuclear power plant control rooms
Laitio, P. (2013) · Cited by 3
Refining Supervisory Control Capability for Target User Populations
Wray, R. E., Jones, R., Newton, C., & Bachelor, B. (2017) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-58077-7_56 · Cited by 3
A Framework for Evaluating Field-Based, High-Throughput Phenotyping Systems: A Meta-Analysis
Young, S. N. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19163582 · Cited by 3
Robot, Take the Joystick: Understanding Space Robotics Experts’ Views on Autonomy
Smith, C., Mott, T., & Williams, T. (2024) · IEEE RO-MAN · doi:10.1109/ro-man60168.2024.10731167 · Cited by 3
The Changing Face of Airmanship and Safety Culture Operating Unmanned Aircraft Systems
Lamb, T. L. (2019) · Advances in logistics, operations, and management science book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7900-7.ch009 · Cited by 3
Artificial Intelligence (AI) in the Workplace: A Study of Stakeholders’ Views on Benefits, Issues and Challenges of AI Systems
Gamkrelidze, T., Zouinar, M., & Barcellini, F. (2021) · Lecture notes in networks and systems · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-74614-8_78 · Cited by 3
A Multi-Objective Optimization Approach for Multi-Vehicle Path Planning Problems Considering Human–Robot Interactions
Chirala, V. S., Venkatachalam, S., Smereka, J. M., & Kassoumeh, S. (2021) · Journal of Autonomous Vehicles and Systems · doi:10.1115/1.4053426 · Cited by 3
AASVMES: An intelligent expert system for realization of Adaptive Autonomy using Support Vector Machine
Hassanpour, N., Zamani, M. A., Fereidunian, A., & Lesani, H. (2011) · International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, and Automation · doi:10.1109/icciautom.2011.6356643 · Cited by 3
AAHPNES: A Hierarchical Petri Net Expert System realization of adaptive autonomy in Smart Grid
Fereidunian, A., Zamani, M., Kolarijani, M. A. S., & Lesani, H. (2011) · doi:10.1109/ptc.2011.6019387 · Cited by 3
What the heck is it doing ? Better understanding Human-Machine conflicts through models.
Pizziol, S., Tessier, C., & Dehais, F. (2012) · HAL · Cited by 3
Confidence-Based State Estimation: A Novel Tool for Test and Evaluation of Human-Systems
Marathe, A. R., McDaniel, J. R., Gordon, S. M., & McDowell, K. (2016) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41959-6_24 · Cited by 3
Development of an Autonomous Manager for Dyadic Human-Machine Teams in an Applied Multitasking Surveillance Environment
Frame, M. E., Boydstun, A. S., Maresca, A. M., & Lopez, J. S. (2019) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-11051-2_107 · Cited by 3
Sepsis surveillance: an examination of parameter sensitivity and alert reliability
Amland, R. C., Burghart, M., & Overhage, J. M. (2019) · JAMIA Open · doi:10.1093/jamiaopen/ooz014 · Cited by 3
Integration of AI for Clinical Decision Support
Visweswaran, S., King, A. J., & Cooper, G. F. (2022) · Cognitive informatics in biomedicine and healthcare · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-09108-7_10 · Cited by 3
Deep Space Human-Systems Research Recommendations for Future Human-Automation/Robotic Integration
Karasinski, J. A., Holder, S., Robinson, S. K., & Márquez, J. J. (2020) · NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA) · Cited by 3
Discovering the Sweet Spot of Human-Computer Configurations: A Case Study in Information ExtractionPreprint
Mackeprang, M., Müller-Birn, C., & Stauss, M. T. (2019) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1909.07065 · Cited by 2
Enhancing Pilot-Autopilot Collaboration in Cruising Operations Through Task Allocation: A Psychophysiological Approach
Yiu, C. Y., Li, Q., Ng, K. K. H., & 中原, 信. (2025) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2025.2608264 · Cited by 3
Efficiency Pitfalls of Explainable AI in Clinical Diagnostic and Treatment Human-AI Workflows
Hunsicker, T., Schulz, A., Leist, R. A., Kiefer, S., Boden, K., Rothaus, K., König, C. J., & Langer, M. (2026) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208261443764 · Cited by 2
Perception of Trust in Automation
Madhavan, P. (2015) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511973017.031 · Cited by 2
Bibliometric Analysis of Human Factors Research: Intellectual Structure and Evolution
Wang, J., & Shan, W. (2017) · Advances in intelligent systems and computing · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60011-6_4 · Cited by 2
AF 447 as a Paradigmatic Accident
Chialastri, A. (2019) · Advances in mechatronics and mechanical engineering (AMME) book series · doi:10.4018/978-1-5225-7709-6.ch006 · Cited by 2
Information automation and reliability: Effects on human behavior
Avril, E. (2022) · Bulletin de psychologie · doi:10.3917/bupsy.575.0067 · Cited by 2
Recognition Assistance Interface for Human-Automation Cooperation in Pedestrian Risk Prediction
Kuribayashi, A., Takeuchi, E., Carballo, A., Ishiguro, Y., & Takeda, K. (2023) · SAE International Journal of Connected and Automated Vehicles · doi:10.4271/12-06-03-0023 · Cited by 2
Pilot attention and perception and spatial cognition
Wickens, C. D. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-420139-2.00009-5 · Cited by 2
Self-citation
A study on trust in alarms in a nuclear power plant microworld simulation
Ragsdale, A., Lew, R., & Boring, R. L. (2015) · Resilience Week (RWS) · doi:10.1109/rweek.2015.7287439 · Cited by 2
The Implications of Mobile Notifications for User Experience of a Social Network Service
Vihavainen, S., & Vä�¤nänen-Vainio-Mattila, K. (2013) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v7i2.2373 · Cited by 2

Authors: Parasuraman, R., & Wickens, C. D.
Affiliations: George Mason University (US)
Alion Science and Technology (United States) (US)
ORCID: Wickens, Christopher D.
Venue: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 2008-06
Volume: 50
Issue: 3
Pages: 511-520
ISSN: 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
1547-8181
DOI: 10.1518/001872008x312198
OpenAlex: W2043515850
Cited by: 401
References: 102
Citations by year: 2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 30
FWCI: 25.87
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords: human-automation interaction, levels of automation, reliance on automation, adaptive automation, operator trust, false alarms, situational awareness, workload, safety-critical systems, automation design
MeSH terms: Automation, Humans, Ergonomics, Man-Machine Systems, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks