Cited by 401Human-Automation Interaction and SafetySocial Robot Interaction and HRIUsability and User Interface Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 102 of the 102 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation

Parasuraman, Raja, Wickens, Christopher D.·2008·Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

DOI 10.1518/001872008x312198

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Objective: The authors discuss empirical studies of human-automation interaction and their implications for automation design. Background: Automation is prevalent in safety-critical systems and increasingly in everyday life. Many studies of human performance in automated systems have been conducted over the past 30 years. Methods: Developments in three areas are examined: levels and stages of automation, reliance on and compliance with automation, and adaptive automation. Results: Automation applied to information analysis or decision-making functions leads to differential system performance benefits and costs that must be considered in choosing appropriate levels and stages of automation. Human user dependence on automated alerts and advisories reflects two components of operator trust, reliance and compliance, which are in turn determined by the threshold designers use to balance automation misses and false alarms. Finally, adaptive automation can provide additional benefits in balancing workload and maintaining the user's situation awareness, although more research is required to identify when adaptation should be user controlled or system driven. Conclusions: The past three decades of empirical research on humans and automation has provided a strong science base that can be used to guide the design of automated systems. Application: This research can be applied to most current and future automated systems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1518/001872008x312198

Cites

102 of 102 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Orienting of Attention
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 1×
“Whether information is relevant or not can be ambiguous, so a potential performance cost may occur if the cueing of the highest-priority target is imperfect (Posner, 1980; Metzger & Parasuraman, 2005).”
Trust in Automation: Designing for Appropriate Reliance
Lee, J. D., & See, K. A. (2004) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392 · Cited by 6,605
Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction
(1993) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/0003-6870(93)90471-k · Cited by 5,592
Designing the user interface strategies for effective human-computer interaction
Shneiderman, B. (1998) · SIGB · doi:10.1145/25065.950626 · Cited by 4,680
Humans and automation: Use, misuse, disuse, abuse
Parasuraman, R., & Riley, V. (1997) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872097778543886 · Cited by 4,554
Self-citation
A model for types and levels of human interaction with automation
Parasuraman, R., Sheridan, T. B., & Wickens, C. D. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans · doi:10.1109/3468.844354 · Cited by 4,195 · cited 1×
“Parasuraman, Sheridan, and Wickens (2000) accordingly proposed an extension of the LOA concept to four information-processing stages: (a) information acquisition, (b) information analysis, (c) decision making, and (d) action, with each stage having its own LOA scale (for similar scales, see Endsley & Kaber, 1999; Ends…”
BackgroundSelf-citation
Effects of Computerized Clinical Decision Support Systems on Practitioner Performance and Patient Outcomes: A Systematic Review
Garg, A. X., Adhikari, N. K. J., McDonald, H., Rosas-Arellano, M. P., Devereaux, P. J., Beyene, J., Sam, J., & Haynes, R. B. (2005) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.293.10.1223 · Cited by 2,936
Multiple resources and performance prediction
Wickens, C. D. (2002) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/14639220210123806 · Cited by 2,621 · cited 1×
“…terms, the former are mediated by posterior brain regions (occipito-temporo-parietal cortex) and the latter by anterior areas (frontal cortex), with these brain regions possibly defining different mental resources (Para-suraman & Wilson, 2008 [this issue]; Wickens, 2002, 2008 [this issue]).”
Self-citation
Multiple Resources and Mental Workload
Wickens, C. D. (2008) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x288394 · Cited by 2,164
Self-citation
Trust, control strategies and allocation of function in human-machine systems
LEE, J., & MORAY, N. (1992) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139208967392 · Cited by 1,459

Show all 102 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

Ahlstrom, V., 2005, Human factors design guide (DOT/FAA/CT-02-11)
Bagheri, N., 2004, HPSAA, 54
Billings, C.E. & Woods, D.D. (1994). Concerns about adaptive automation in aviation systems. In M. Mouloua & R. Parasuraman (Eds.), Human performance in automated systems: Current research and trends (pp. 24-29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Crocoll, W.M., Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 34th Annual Meeting
Dornheim, M., 1999, Aviation Week and Space Technology, 46
Hancock, P., Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics
Hilburn, B., Jorna, P.G., Byrne, E.A. & Parasuraman, R. (1997). The effect of adaptive air traffic control (ATC) decision aiding on controller mental workload. In M. Mouloua & J. Koonce (Eds.), Human-automation interaction: Research and practice (pp. 84-91). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
Joint Planning and Development Office (JPDO)., 2007, Concept for operations of the next generation air transportation system (Vol. 2)
Lee, J.D., 1992, Ergonomics, 22, 671
10.1518/hfes.46.1.50.30392 · DOI · Paper page
Mouloua, M., Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 37th Annual Meeting
Mundra, A., 1989, A new automation aid for air traffic controllers for improving airport capacity (MP-89W00034)
National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)., 2008, National research announcement #IAFD
Opperman, R., 1994, Adaptive user support
Parasuraman, R., 2007, International Journal of Command and Control, 1, 43
Parasuraman, R., Mouloua, M. & Hilburn, B. (1999). Adaptive aiding and adaptive task allocation enhance human-machine interaction. In M. W. Scerbo & M. Mouloua (Eds.), Automation technology and human performance: Current research and trends (pp. 119-123). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Riley, V.A., Proceedings of the World Aviation Congress and Exposition
Sarter, N., Woods, D. & Billings, C.E. (1997). Automation surprises. In G. Salvendy (Ed.), Handbook of human factors and ergonomics (2nd ed., pp. 1926-1943). New York: Wiley.
Sorkin, R.D., 1989, Human Factors Bulletin, 32, 3
U.S. Army., 2007, THAAD Theatre High Altitude Area Defense Missile System
Warwick, K., 2004, I, cyborg
Wickens, C.D., 2000, Imperfect and unreliable automation and its implications for attention allocation, information access and situation awareness (Tech. Rep. ARL-00-10/NASA-00-2)
Wickens, C.D., Paper presented at the 13th International Symposium on Aviation Psychology
Wickens, C.D., 2008, Addressing the alert problem in air traffic control (Air Traffic Control Facilities Annual Report, FAA Grant #20070271)
Wickens, C.D., Imperfect reliability in unmanned airvehicle supervision and control

Sorted by citations

Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy
Dwivedi, Y. K., Hughes, L., Ismagilova, E., Aarts, G., Coombs, C., Crick, T., Duan, Y., Dwivedi, R., Edwards, J., Eirug, A., et al. (2021) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.08.002 · Cited by 4,611
“For example, information processing tasks comprise of (1) information acquisition; (2) information analysis; (3) decision and action selection; and (4) action implementation (Parasuraman & Wickens, 2008).”
Background
Complacency and Bias in Human Use of Automation: An Attentional Integration
Parasuraman, R., & Manzey, D. H. (2010) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720810376055 · Cited by 1,710
Self-citation
Toward a Framework for Levels of Robot Autonomy in Human-Robot Interaction
Beer, J. M., Fisk, A. D., & Rogers, W. A. (2014) · Journal of Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.5898/jhri.3.2.beer · Cited by 636
Human–Autonomy Teaming: A Review and Analysis of the Empirical Literature
O’Neill, T., McNeese, N. J., Barron, A. H., & Schelble, B. G. (2020) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720820960865 · Cited by 681
Haptic shared control: smoothly shifting control authority?
Abbink, D. A., Mulder, M., & Boer, E. R. (2011) · Cognition Technology & Work · doi:10.1007/s10111-011-0192-5 · Cited by 525
Enhancing user experience with conversational agent for movie recommendation: Effects of self-disclosure and reciprocity
Lee, S., & Choi, J. (2017) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2017.02.005 · Cited by 388
Situation Awareness: Review of Mica Endsley's 1995 Articles on Situation Awareness Theory and Measurement
Wickens, C. D. (2008) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1518/001872008x288420 · Cited by 338
Self-citation
A Topology of Shared Control Systems—Finding Common Ground in Diversity
Abbink, D. A., Carlson, T., Mulder, M., de Winter, J., Aminravan, F., Gibo, T. L., & Boer, E. R. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2018.2791570 · Cited by 323
Affective Processes in Human–Automation Interactions
Merritt, S. M. (2011) · Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811411912 · Cited by 260
Alterations in cognitive performance during passive hyperthermia are task dependent
Gaoua, N., Racinais, S., Grantham, J., & El Massioui, F. (2011) · International Journal of Hyperthermia · doi:10.3109/02656736.2010.516305 · Cited by 234
Automated driving: Safety blind spots
Noy, I. Y., Shinar, D., & Horrey, W. J. (2017) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2017.07.018 · Cited by 230
Student perceptions of ChatGPT use in a college essay assignment: Implications for learning, grading, and trust in artificial intelligence
Tossell, C. C., Tenhundfeld, N. L., Momen, A., Cooley, K., & de Visser, E. J. (2024) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2024.3355015 · Cited by 218
Complexity-based task allocation in human-robot collaborative assembly
Malik, A. A., & Bilberg, A. (2019) · Industrial Robot the international journal of robotics research and application · doi:10.1108/ir-11-2018-0231 · Cited by 182
Keep the driver in control: Automating automobiles of the future
Banks, V. A., & Stanton, N. A. (2015) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.06.020 · Cited by 147
Effects of movement speed and predictability in human–robot collaboration
Koppenborg, M., Nickel, P., Naber, B., Lungfiel, A., & Huelke, M. (2017) · Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries · doi:10.1002/hfm.20703 · Cited by 143
Ironies of Automation: Still Unresolved After All These Years
Strauch, B. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems · doi:10.1109/thms.2017.2732506 · Cited by 139
Work design in future industrial production: Transforming towards cyber-physical systems
Waschull, S., Bokhorst, J. A. C., Molleman, E., & Wortmann, J. C. (2020) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2019.01.053 · Cited by 124
Human Reliance on Machine Learning Models When Performance Feedback is Limited: Heuristics and Risks
Lu, Z., & Yin, M. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3411764.3445562 · Cited by 131
Evolution and revolution: Personality research for the coming world of robots, artificial intelligence, and autonomous systems
Matthews, G., Hancock, P. A., Lin, J., Panganiban, A. R., Reinerman-Jones, L., Szalma, J. L., & Wohleber, R. W. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2020.109969 · Cited by 131
System reliability, performance and trust in adaptable automation.
Chavaillaz, A., Wastell, D., & Sauer, J. S. (2016) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2015.07.012 · Cited by 102
Cognition, Technology, and Organizational Limits: Lessons from the Air France 447 Disaster
Oliver, N., Calvard, T. S., & Potočnik, K. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1138 · Cited by 109
Evaluating Cobots for Final Assembly
Fast–Berglund, Å., Palmkvist, F., Nyqvist, P., Ekered, S., & Åkerman, M. (2016) · Procedia CIRP · doi:10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.114 · Cited by 103
Cognitive conflict in human-automation interactions: a psychophysiological study.
Dehais, F., Causse, M., Vachon, F., & Tremblay, S. (2012) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.09.004 · Cited by 91
Impact of automation: Measurement of performance, workload and behaviour in a complex control environment
Balfe, N., Sharples, S., & Wilson, J. R. (2014) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.08.002 · Cited by 87
ARTFul
Szafir, D. J., & Mutlu, B. (2013) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2470654.2466128 · Cited by 82
Understanding human management of automation errors
McBride, S. E., Rogers, W. A., & Fisk, A. D. (2014) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2013.817625 · Cited by 82
A survey on hybrid human-artificial intelligence for autonomous driving
Ning, H., Yin, R., Ullah, A., & Shi, F. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3074695 · Cited by 84
Reconfiguring and ramping-up ventilator production in the face of COVID-19: Can robots help?
Malik, A. A., Masood, T., & Kousar, R. (2020) · Journal of Manufacturing Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jmsy.2020.09.008 · Cited by 79
Adaptable (Not Adaptive) Automation: Forefront of Human–Automation Teaming
Calhoun, G. L. (2021) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/00187208211037457 · Cited by 79
Cognitive automation strategy for reconfigurable and sustainable assembly systems
Fast–Berglund, Å., & Stahre, J. (2013) · Assembly Automation · doi:10.1108/aa-12-2013-036 · Cited by 75
Understanding the impact of control levels over emotion-aware chatbots
Benke, I., Gnewuch, U., & Maedche, A. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2021.107122 · Cited by 76
Human Trust-Based Feedback Control: Dynamically Varying Automation Transparency to Optimize Human-Machine Interactions
Kumar, A., McMahon, G., Reid, T., & Jain, N. (2020) · IEEE Control Systems · doi:10.1109/mcs.2020.3019151 · Cited by 58
How different types of users develop trust in technology: A qualitative analysis of the antecedents of active and passive user trust in a shared technology
Xu, J., Kim, L., Deitermann, A. M., & Montague, E. N. H. (2014) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.04.012 · Cited by 83
Mitigation of Conflicts with Automation
Dehais, F., Causse, M., & Tremblay, S. (2011) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1177/0018720811418635 · Cited by 51
MENTAL WORKLOAD
Hancock, G. M., Longo, L., Young, M. S., & Hancock, P. A. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119636113.ch7 · Cited by 70
Designing automation for complex work environments under different levels of stress
Sauer, J., Nickel, P., & Wastell, D. G. (2012) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2012.05.008 · Cited by 66
Should it be automatic or manual—The occupant's perspective on the design of domestic control systems
Karjalainen, S. (2013) · Energy and Buildings · doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.043 · Cited by 62
From reading to driving
Borojeni, S. S., Weber, L., Heuten, W., & Boll, S. (2018) · International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services (MobileHCI) · doi:10.1145/3229434.3229464 · Cited by 62
The Role of Trust as a Mediator Between System Characteristics and Response Behaviors
Chancey, E. T., Bliss, J. P., Proaps, A. B., & Madhavan, P. (2015) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1177/0018720815582261 · Cited by 61
Trust in vehicle technology
Walker, G. H., Stanton, N. A., & Salmon, P. M. (2016) · International Journal of Vehicle Design · doi:10.1504/ijvd.2016.074419 · Cited by 70
Automation in airport security X-ray screening of cabin baggage: Examining benefits and possible implementations of automated explosives detection.
Hattenschwiler, N., Sterchi, Y., Mendes, M., & Schwaninger, A. (2018) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2018.05.003 · Cited by 54
Industry 4.0: defining the research agenda
Erro‐Garcés, A. (2019) · Benchmarking An International Journal · doi:10.1108/bij-12-2018-0444 · Cited by 65
Transitioning to Future Air Traffic Management: Effects of Imperfect Automation on Controller Attention and Performance
Rovira, E., & Parasuraman, R. (2010) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1177/0018720810375692 · Cited by 59
Self-citation
Autopilot, Mind Wandering, and the Out of the Loop Performance Problem
Gouraud, J., Arnaud Delorme, A., & Berberian, B. (2017) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2017.00541 · Cited by 79
Task-model based assessment of automation levels: Application to space ground segments
Martinie, C., Palanque, P. A., Barboni, É., & Ragosta, M. (2011) · Conference proceedings/Conference proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/icsmc.2011.6084173 · Cited by 58
Designing for Human-Centered Systems: Situational Risk as a Factor of Trust in Automation
Perkins, L., Miller, J. E., Hashemi, A., & Burns, G. N. (2010) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193121005402502 · Cited by 58
Human–automation teams and adaptable control for future air traffic management
Langan‐Fox, J., Canty, J. M., & Sankey, M. J. (2009) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2009.04.002 · Cited by 57
Looking for Age Differences in Self-Driving Vehicles: Examining the Effects of Automation Reliability, Driving Risk, and Physical Impairment on Trust
Rovira, E. M., McLaughlin, A. C., Pak, R., & High, L. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00800 · Cited by 57
A risk model for autonomous marine systems and operation focusing on human–autonomy collaboration
Thieme, C. A., & Utne, I. B. (2017) · Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part O Journal of Risk and Reliability · doi:10.1177/1748006x17709377 · Cited by 55
What factors predict the type of person who is willing to fly in an autonomous commercial airplane?
Rice, S. C., Winter, S. R., Mehta, R., & Ragbir, N. K. (2019) · Journal of Air Transport Management · doi:10.1016/j.jairtraman.2018.12.008 · Cited by 61
How Can Physiological Computing Benefit Human-Robot Interaction?
Roy, R. N., Drougard, N., Gateau, T., Dehais, F., & Chanel, C. P. C. (2020) · Robotics · doi:10.3390/robotics9040100 · Cited by 58
Cumulative Knowledge and Progress in Human Factors
Proctor, R. W., & Vu, K. L. (2009) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100325 · Cited by 53
Human factors engineering in aircraft maintenance: a review
Shanmugam, A., & Robert, T. P. (2015) · Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering · doi:10.1108/jqme-05-2013-0030 · Cited by 50
A comparison of adaptive and adaptable automation under different levels of environmental stress
Sauer, J., Kao, C.-S., & Wastell, D. G. (2012) · Ergonomics · doi:10.1080/00140139.2012.676673 · Cited by 50
An extension of the theory of technology dominance: Capturing the underlying causal complexity
Sutton, S., Arnold, V., & Holt, M. (2023) · International Journal of Accounting Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.accinf.2023.100626 · Cited by 32
Stages and Levels of Automation in Support of Space Teleoperations
Li, H., Wickens, C. D., Sarter, N. B., & Sebok, A. L. (2014) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720814522830 · Cited by 47
Self-citation
The out-of-the-loop Brain: A neuroergonomic approach of the human automation interaction
Berberian, B., Somon, B., Sahaï, A., & Gouraud, J. (2017) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2017.09.010 · Cited by 52
Quantifying the effectiveness of an alarm management system through human factors studies
Adhitya, A., Cheng, S. F., Lee, Z., & Srinivasan, R. (2014) · Computers & Chemical Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.compchemeng.2014.03.013 · Cited by 46
Vigilance and Automation Dependence in Operation of Multiple Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS): A Simulation Study
Wohleber, R. W., Matthews, G., Lin, J., Szalma, J., Calhoun, G., Funke, G., Chiu, C., & Ruff, H. (2018) · Hum. Factors · doi:10.1177/0018720818799468 · Cited by 42
Intuitive Cognition and Models of Human–Automation Interaction
Patterson, R. (2017) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720816659796 · Cited by 55
Toward Adaptive Trust Calibration for Level 2 Driving Automation
Akash, K., Jain, N., & Misu, T. (2020) · INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MULTIMODAL INTERACTION · doi:10.1145/3382507.3418885 · Cited by 54
Automation in aviation
Chialastri, A. (2012) · InTech eBooks · doi:10.5772/49949 · Cited by 44
Automation reliability, human-machine system performance, and operator compliance: A study with airport security screeners supported by automated explosives detection systems for cabin baggage screening.
Huegli, D., Merks, S., & Schwaninger, A. (2020) · Applied Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2020.103094 · Cited by 38
Using Engagement to Negate Vigilance Decrements in the NextGen Environment
Pop, V. L., Stearman, E. J., Kazi, S., & Durso, F. T. (2012) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.634759 · Cited by 42
Discovering the Sweet Spot of Human-Computer Configurations
Mackeprang, M., Müller-Birn, C., & Stauss, M. T. (2019) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3359297 · Cited by 41
Toward Adaptive Driving Styles for Automated Driving with Users' Trust and Preferences
Natarajan, M., Akash, K., & Misu, T. (2022) · ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI) · doi:10.1109/hri53351.2022.9889313 · Cited by 42
Automated UAV tasks for search and surveillance
Kingston, D. B., Rasmussen, S., & Humphrey, L. R. (2016) · The proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Control Applications/The proceedings of the ... IEEE Conference on Control Applications · doi:10.1109/cca.2016.7587813 · Cited by 41
Adaptive automation: Status of research and future challenges
Bernabei, M., & Costantino, F. (2024) · Robotics Comput. Integr. Manuf. · doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2024.102724 · Cited by 39
Prospective memory in an air traffic control simulation: External aids that signal when to act.
Loft, S., Smith, R. E., & Bhaskara, A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0022845 · Cited by 40
Does the domain of technology impact user trust? Investigating trust in automation across different consumer-oriented domains in young adults, military, and older adults
Pak, R., Rovira, E. M., McLaughlin, A. C., & Baldwin, N. K. (2016) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2016.1175523 · Cited by 46
Industrial Robot Ethics: The Challenges of Closer Human Collaboration in Future Manufacturing Systems
Fletcher, S., & Webb, P. (2017) · International series on intelligent systems, control and automation: science and engineering · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46667-5_12 · Cited by 40
When the Going Gets Tough: Exploring Agent-based Models of Human Performance under Demanding Conditions
van Lambalgen, R. M. (2012) · Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) · Cited by 40
Design Guidelines for Reliability Communication in Autonomous Vehicles
Faltaous, S., Baumann, M. R. K., Schneegaß, S., & Chuang, L. L. (2018) · International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications (AutomotiveUI) · doi:10.1145/3239060.3239072 · Cited by 44
Optimizing the balance between task automation and human manual control in simulated submarine track management.
Michailovs, S., Visser, T. A. W., Huf, S., & Loft, S. D. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied · doi:10.1037/xap0000126 · Cited by 37
The role of automation in reducing stress and negative affect while driving
Cottrell, N., & Barton, B. K. (2011) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1464536x.2011.573011 · Cited by 37
Where’s the Emotion? How Sport Psychology Can Inform Research on Emotion in Human Factors
Eccles, D. W., Ward, P., Woodman, T., Janelle, C. M., Scanff, C. L., Ehrlinger, J. M., Castanier, C., & Coombes, S. A. (2011) · Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · doi:10.1177/0018720811403731 · Cited by 42
How Explainable AI Affects Human Performance: A Systematic Review of the Behavioural Consequences of Saliency Maps
Müller, R. (2024) · International journal of human computer interactions · doi:10.1080/10447318.2024.2381929 · Cited by 39
A function-to-task process model for adaptive automation system design
Bindewald, J. M., Miller, M. E., & Peterson, G. L. (2014) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.07.004 · Cited by 37
Trust in Management Information Systems (MIS)
Meeßen, S. M., Thielsch, M. T., & Hertel, G. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O · doi:10.1026/0932-4089/a000306 · Cited by 44
Tipping point: The narrow path between automation acceptance and rejection in air traffic management
Bekier, M., Molesworth, B., & Williamson, A. (2012) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2011.08.059 · Cited by 43
Human–machine interaction theories and lane departure warnings
Navarro, J. (2016) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2016.1243274 · Cited by 34
Cognitive engineering
Wilson, K., Helton, W. S., & Wiggins, M. W. (2012) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science · doi:10.1002/wcs.1204 · Cited by 34
Systemic Oversimplification Limits the Potential for Human-AI Partnership
Metcalfe, J. S., Perelman, B. S., Boothe, D. L., & McDowell, K. (2021) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3078298 · Cited by 37
What factors may influence decision-making in the operation of Maritime autonomous surface ships? A systematic review
Lynch, K. M., Banks, V. A., Roberts, A. P. J., Radcliffe, S., & Plant, K. L. (2022) · Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science · doi:10.1080/1463922x.2022.2152900 · Cited by 38
Specifying autonomy in the Internet of Things: the autonomy model and notation
Janiesch, C., Fischer, M., Winkelmann, A., & Nentwich, V. (2018) · Information Systems and e-Business Management · doi:10.1007/s10257-018-0379-x · Cited by 33
Keeping the driver in the loop through semi-automated or manual lane changes in conditionally automated driving
Dillmann, J., Hartigh, R. J. R. D., Kurpiers, C., Pelzer, J., Raisch, F., Cox, R. F. A., & de Waard, D. (2021) · Accident Analysis & Prevention · doi:10.1016/j.aap.2021.106397 · Cited by 34
Human performance metrics for the nuclear domain: A tool for evaluating measures of workload, situation awareness and teamwork
Reinerman-Jones, L., Hughes, N., D’Agostino, A., & Matthews, G. (2018) · International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics · doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2018.12.001 · Cited by 30
Towards Mixed-Initiative Human–Robot Interaction: Assessment of Discriminative Physiological and Behavioral Features for Performance Prediction
Chanel, C. P. C., Roy, R. N., Dehais, F., & Drougard, N. (2020) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s20010296 · Cited by 32
Multiscale approach to the security of hardware supply chains for energy systems
Lambert, J. H., Keisler, J. M., Wheeler, W. E., Collier, Z. A., & Linkov, I. (2013) · Environment Systems & Decisions · doi:10.1007/s10669-013-9465-2 · Cited by 30
Digital Technologies Enabling Component Reuse in Circular Value Chains: Using Digital Twin, Internet of Things and Robots in Construction and Manufacturing Sectors
Thakuri, P. K., Alkki, L., & Aarikka‐Stenroos, L. (2024) · R and D Management · doi:10.1111/radm.12744 · Cited by 44
The impact of controller support tools in enroute air traffic control on cognitive error modes: A comparative analysis in two operational environments
Corver, S., & Aneziris, O. N. (2014) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2014.07.018 · Cited by 29
Pilot Performance in Trajectory-Based Operations Under Concepts of Operation That Vary Separation Responsibility Across Pilots, Air Traffic Controllers, and Automation
Vu, K. L., Strybel, T. Z., Battiste, V., Lachter, J., Dao, A.-Q. V., Brandt, S. L., Ligda, S. V., & Johnson, W. W. (2012) · International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1080/10447318.2012.634761 · Cited by 28
Inappropriate trust in technology: implications for critical care nurses
Browne, M., & Cook, P. A. (2011) · Nursing in Critical Care · doi:10.1111/j.1478-5153.2010.00407.x · Cited by 27
Automation-Level Transference Effects in Simulated Multiple Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Control
Calhoun, G. L., Ruff, H. A., Draper, M. H., & Wright, E. J. (2011) · Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making · doi:10.1177/1555343411399069 · Cited by 27
The Influence of Automation Support on Performance, Workload, and Situation Awareness of Air Traffic Controllers
van de Merwe, K., Oprins, E. A. P. B., Eriksson, F., & van der Plaat, A. (2012) · International Journal of Aviation Psychology · doi:10.1080/10508414.2012.663241 · Cited by 27
Adaptable automation for a more human-centered work design? Effects on human perception and behavior
Rieth, M., Onnasch, L., & Hagemann, V. (2024) · International Journal of Human-Computer Studies · doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2024.103246 · Cited by 29
The Impact of Automation Assisted Aircraft Separation on Situation Awareness
Dao, A.-Q. V., Brandt, S. L., Battiste, V., Vu, K. L., Strybel, T. Z., & Johnson, W. W. (2009) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-02559-4_80 · Cited by 26
Workload Is Multidimensional, Not Unitary: What Now?
Matthews, G., Reinerman-Jones, L., Wohleber, R. W., Lin, J., Mercado, J., & Abich, J. (2015) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-20816-9_5 · Cited by 27
Transparent Automation for Assessing and Designing better Interactions between Operators and Partly-Autonomous Interactive Systems
Bernhaupt, R., Cronel, M., Manciet, F., Martinie, C., & Palanque, P. A. (2015) · International Conference on Application and Theory of Automation in Command and Control Systems (ATACCS) · doi:10.1145/2899361.2899375 · Cited by 26
Considering human's non-deterministic behavior and his availability state when designing a collaborative human-robots system
Gateau, T., Chanel, C. P. C., Le, M.-H., & Dehais, F. (2016) · IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS) · doi:10.1109/iros.2016.7759646 · Cited by 26

Authors: Parasuraman, R., & Wickens, C. D.
Affiliations: George Mason University (US)
Alion Science and Technology (United States) (US)
ORCID: Wickens, Christopher D.
Venue: Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Publisher: SAGE Publications
Published: 2008-06
Volume: 50
Issue: 3
Pages: 511-520
ISSN: 0018-7208 (ISSN-L)
1547-8181
DOI: 10.1518/001872008x312198
OpenAlex: W2043515850
Cited by: 401
References: 102
Citations by year: 2026: 18 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 30
FWCI: 25.87
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society (publishedVersion)
PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Usability and User Interface Design
Keywords: human-automation interaction, levels of automation, reliance on automation, adaptive automation, operator trust, false alarms, situational awareness, workload, safety-critical systems, automation design
MeSH terms: Automation, Humans, Ergonomics, Man-Machine Systems, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Humans: Still Vital After All These Years of Automation

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks