Cited by 176Coffee research and impactsSports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The Acute Effects of a Caffeine-Containing Supplement on Strength, Muscular Endurance, and Anaerobic Capabilities

Beck, Travis W., Housh, Terry J., Schmidt, Richard J., Johnson, Glen O., Housh, Dona J., Coburn, Jared W., Malek, Moh H.·2006·The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the acute effects of a caffeine-containing supplement on upper- and lower-body strength and muscular endurance as well as anaerobic capabilities. Thirty-seven resistance-trained men (mean +/- SD, age: 21 +/- 2 years) volunteered to participate in this study. On the first laboratory visit, the subjects performed 2 Wingate Anaerobic Tests (WAnTs) to determine peak power (PP) and mean power (MP), as well as tests for 1 repetition maximum (1RM), dynamic constant external resistance strength, and muscular endurance (TOTV; total volume of weight lifted during an endurance test with 80% of the 1RM) on the bilateral leg extension (LE) and free-weight bench press (BP) exercises. Following a minimum of 48 hours of rest, the subjects returned to the laboratory for the second testing session and were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 groups: a supplement group (SUPP; n = 17), which ingested a caffeine-containing supplement, or a placebo group (PLAC; n = 20), which ingested a cellulose placebo. One hour after ingesting either the caffeine-containing supplement or the placebo, the subjects performed 2 WAnTs and were tested for 1RM strength and muscular endurance on the LE and BP exercises. The results indicated that there was a significant (p < 0.05) increase in BP 1RM for the SUPP group, but not for the PLAC group. The caffeine-containing supplement had no effect, however, on LE 1RM, LE TOTV, BP TOTV, PP, and MP. Thus, the caffeine-containing supplement…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/18285.1

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beck, T. W., Housh, T. J., Schmidt, R. J., Johnson, G. O., Housh, D. J., Coburn, J. W., & Malek, M. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Nebraska–Lincoln (US)
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center (US)
Venue
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2006
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
506
ISSN
  • 1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4287
OpenAlex
W1967446125
Cited by
176
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 9
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Coffee research and impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
caffeine, acute supplementation, resistance-trained men, muscle strength, muscular endurance, anaerobic capacity, Wingate test, one-repetition maximum, bench press, leg extension, peak power, average power
MeSH terms
Adult, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Caffeine, Double-Blind Method, Exercise Test, Humans, Male, Physical Endurance, Weight Lifting, Anaerobic Threshold, Muscle, Skeletal, Dietary Supplements, Muscle Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review