Cited by 60Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsSports Performance and TrainingPhysical Activity and Health

Affective Responses to Acute Resistance Exercise Performed at Self-Selected and Imposed Loads in Trained Women

Focht, Brian C., Garver, Matthew J., Cotter, Joshua A., Devor, Steven T., Lucas, Alexander R., Fairman, Ciaran M.·2015·Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the affective responses to acute resistance exercise (RE) performed at self-selected (SS) and imposed loads in recreationally trained women. Secondary purposes were to (a) examine differences in correlates of motivation for future participation in RE and (b) determine whether affective responses to RE were related to these select motivational correlates of RE participation. Twenty recreationally trained young women (mean age = 23 years) completed 3 RE sessions involving 3 sets of 10 repetitions using loads of 40% of 1 repetition maximum (1RM), 70% 1RM, and an SS load. Affective responses were assessed before, during, and after each RE session using the Feeling Scale. Self-efficacy and intention for using the imposed and SS loads for their regular RE participation during the next month were also assessed postexercise. Results revealed that although the SS and imposed load RE sessions yielded different trajectories of change in affect during exercise (p < 0.01), comparable improvements in affect emerged after RE. Additionally, the SS condition was associated with the highest ratings of self-efficacy and intention for future RE participation (p < 0.01), but affective responses to acute RE were unrelated to self-efficacy or intention. It is concluded that acute bouts of SS and imposed load RE resulted in comparable improvements in affect; recreationally trained women reported the highest self-efficacy and intention to use the load chosen in SS condition in their own resistance training; and affective responses were unrelated to motivational correlates of resistance training.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1519/jsc.0000000000000985

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Focht, B. C., Garver, M. J., Cotter, J. A., Devor, S. T., Lucas, A. R., & Fairman, C. M.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University (US)
  • Abilene Christian University (US)
  • California State University, Long Beach (US)
Corresponding author
Focht, Brian C.
Venue
Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research
Published
2015-11
Volume
29
Issue
11
Pages
3067-3074
ISSN
1064-8011 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1820008272
Cited by
60
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
emotional responses, resistance training, live load, self-efficacy, exercise motivation, exercise intention, acute exercise, Feeling Scale
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Affect, Female, Humans, Self Efficacy, Resistance Training, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review