Cited by 63Names, Identity, and Discrimination ResearchExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesLabor market dynamics and wage inequality

Are firms that discriminate more likely to go out of business

Open access
Pager, Devah·2016·Sociological Science

Abstract

Economic theory has long maintained that employers pay a price for engaging in racial discrimination. According to Gary Becker’s seminal work on this topic and the rich literature that followed, racial preferences unrelated to productivity are costly and, in a competitive market, should drive discriminatory employers out of business. Though a dominant theoretical proposition in the field of economics, this argument has never before been subjected to direct empirical scrutiny. This research pairs an experimental audit study of racial discrimination in employment with an employer database capturing information on establishment survival, examining the relationship between observed discrimination and firm longevity. Results suggest that employers who engage in hiring discrimination are less likely to remain in business six years later.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.15195/v3.a36

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This underutilisation of talent could result in needless economic costs for firms and society.

    “This underutilisation of talent could result in needless economic costs for firms and society (Baert, 2021;OECD, 2020a;Pager, 2016).”

    From The state of hiring discrimination: A meta-analysis of (almost) all recent correspondence experiments (2023) · cites this paper as Pager, 2016

    The Abstract says racial preferences unrelated to productivity can be costly to employers, and the section ‘What Does the Relationship between Discrimination and Business Failure Represent?’ describes discrimination as prioritizing worker characteristics irrelevant to productivity. These passages support possible costs to firms, but the paper does not establish economic costs to society from underutilised talent. The paper also cautions that its results cannot establish discrimination as the direct cause of firm failure. Page numbers were not provided in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Pager (2016) found employers who discriminated in her field experiment were more likely to subsequently go out of business than those that did not.

    “Second, Pager (2016) finds that employers who discriminated in her field experiment were more likely to subsequently go out of business than those that did not, consistent with economic models of taste discrimination.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Aigner, D. J., and Cain, G. 1977. Statistical Theories of Discrimination in Labor Mar- kets. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 30, 749-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/ 001979397703000204 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Altonji, Joseph, and Rebecca Blank (1999) "Race and Gender in the Labor Market." Handbook of Labor Economics ed. Orley Ashenfelter and David Card, Vol. 3C, pp. 3143-3259.
  3. O. Ashenfelter and A. Rees. Princeton, N.J., Princeton University Press.
  4. Ashenfelter, Orley. 1970. "Changes in Labor Market Discrimination Over Time." Journal of Human Resources, 5: 403-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/144999 · DOI
  5. Bader, Michael D.M., Jennifer A. Ailshire, Jeffrey D. Morenoff, and James S. House. 2009. "Measurement of the Local Food Environment: A Comparison of Existing Data Sources." American Journal of Epidemiology 171(5): 609-617. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aje/ kwp419 · DOI
  6. Becker, Gary. 1957. The Economics of Discrimination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  7. Bertrand, Marianne, and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2004. "Are Emily and Greg more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination." The Ameri- can Economic Review 94:991-1013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/0002828042002561 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Black, Sandra E., and Philip E. Strahan. 2001. "The Division of Spoils: Rent-Sharing and Discrimination in a Regulated Industry." American Economic Review, 91(4): 814-831. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.814 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Caballero, Ricardo J., and Mohamad L. Hammour. 1994. "The Cleansing Effect of Recessions." The American Economic Review 84(5):1350-1368.
  10. Charles, Kerwin Kofi, and Jonathan Guryan. 2008. "Prejudice and Wages: An Empirical Assessment of Becker's The Economics of Discrimination," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 116(5): 73-809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/593073 · DOI
  11. Ederington, Josh, and Jeremy Sandford. 2012. "Employer Discrimination and Market Structure." SSRN Working Paper 2071674. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers. cfm?abstract_id=2071674 sociological science | www.sociologicalscience.com 857 September 2016 | Volume 3
  12. Ehrenberg, Ronald G., and Christopher. L. Smith. 2003. "The Sources and Uses of Annual Giving at Selective Private Research Universities and Liberal Arts Colleges." Economics of Education Review 22(3): 223-235. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(02)00073-0 · DOI
  13. Hanssen, F. Andrew, and Torben Andersen. 1999. "Has Discrimination Lessened over Time? A Test Using Baseball's All-Star Vote." Economic Inquiry 37(2):326-352. http: //dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1465-7295.1999.tb01433.x · DOI
  14. Hellerstein, Judith K., David Neumark, and Kenneth R. Troske. 2002. "Market Forces and Sex Discrimination." The Journal of Human Resources 37(2):353-380. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.2307/3069651 · DOI
  15. Kalev, A., and F. Dobbin. 2006. "Enforcement of Civil Rights Law in Private Workplaces: The Effects of Compliance Reviews and Lawsuits Over Time." Law and Social Inquiry 31: 855-879. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4469.2006.00038.x · DOI
  16. Lang, Kevin. 2007. Poverty and Discrimination. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  17. Neumark, David, Junfu Zhang, and Brandon Wall. 2007. "Employment Dynamics and Busi- ness Relocation: New Evidence from the National Establishment Time Series." Research in Labor Economics 26:39-83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0147-9121(06)26002-3 · DOI
  18. O'Neill, June. 1985. "The Trend in the Male-Female Wage Gap in the United States." Journal of Labor Economics, 3: S91-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/298077 · DOI
  19. Page, Scott E. 2008. The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better Groups, Firms, Schools and Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  20. Pager, Devah, Bruce Western, and Bart Bonikowski. 2009. "Discrimination in Low-Wage Labor Markets." American Sociological Review 74:777-799.
  21. Peoples, James, and Lisa Saunders. 1993. "Trucking Deregulation and the Black/White Wage Gap." Industrial & Labor Relations Review October 1993 47: 23-35. http://dx.doi.org/10. 1177/001979399304700102 · DOI
  22. Phelps, Edmund S. 1972. "The Statistical theory of Racism and Sexism." American Economic Review 62(4), 659-61.
  23. Schuman, Howard, Charlotte Steeh, Lawrence Bobo, and Maria Krysan. 1997. Racial Attitudes in America: Trends and Interpretations. Rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  24. Scott, K. A., Heathcote, J. M., and Gruman, J. A. 2011. "The diverse organization: Finding gold at the end of the rainbow." Hum. Resour. Manage., 50: 735-755. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.1002/hrm.20459 sociological science | www.sociologicalscience.com 858 September 2016 | Volume 3 · DOI
  25. Watson, Warren E., Kamalesh Kumar, and Larry K. Michaelsen. 1993. "Cultural Diversity's Impact on Interaction Process and Performance: Comparing Homogenous and Diverse Task Groups." The Academy of Management Journal 36(3):590-602. http://dx.doi.org/10. 2307/256593 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Wilson, William Julius. 1978. The Declining Significance of Race. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pager, D.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Pager, Devah
Venue
Sociological Science
Published
2016
Volume
3
Pages
849-859
ISSN
2330-6696 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2486370133
Cited by
63
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4
FWCI
13.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Sociological Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (0547810)
  • Harvard University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (K01HD053694)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Names, Identity, and Discrimination Research
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
Keywords
racial discrimination in employment, business survival, firm longevity, hiring discrimination, employer discrimination, racial preferences, labor market discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review