The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Age Estimation from the Rib by Phase Analysis: White Females
Abstract
Metamorphosis at the sternal extremity of the rib has already been established as a reliable indicator of age at death. Using a sample of white males, it was shown that an accurate estimation of age can be made by direct examination of the bone itself. However, because of sexual differences in hormonal production and dimorphism in the skeleton, the present study was carried out to develop an appropriate standard for age determination from the sternal rib in white females. The sample consisted of 86 ribs of known age, sex, and race. Observations were made at the costochondral junction with special attention to pit formation (its shape and depth), changes in the walls and rim surrounding it, and overall bone density and texture. Based on changes in these areas, the ribs were separated into nine phases (0 through 8). The most rapid metamorphosis occurred in Phases 1 through 4 (mean ages 14–28) with changes noticeable at 3 to 4 year intervals. After mean age 28, this process slowed, considerably expanding the interval between phases to 10 to 15 years. The female ribs showed both earlier initial pit formation and a different morphologic pattern of aging as compared with males. Statistical analysis revealed that the features chosen to delineate the phases are valid predictors of age. This study has shown that the sternal rib can provide an accurate estimation of age in females spanning a mean age of 14 to 76 years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Age changes in the pubic bone. I. The male white pubis
Todd, T. W. (1920) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.1330030301 · Cited by 733
Cited by
The problem of aging human remains and living individuals: A review
Cunha, E., Baccino, E., Martrille, L., Ramsthaler, F., Prieto, J., Schuliar, Y., Lynnerup, N., & Cattaneo, C. (2009) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.09.008 · Cited by 545
Inter-group violence among early Holocene hunter-gatherers of West Turkana, Kenya
Lahr, M. M., Rivera, F., Power, R. K., Mounier, A., Copsey, B., Crivellaro, F., Edung, J. E., Fernandez, J. M. M., Kiarie, C., Lawrence, J., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16477 · Cited by 328
Application of osteology to forensic medicine
Scheuer, L. (2002) · Clinical Anatomy · doi:10.1002/ca.10028 · Cited by 326
Reconsidering the auricular surface as an indicator of age at death
Osborne, D., Simmons, T., & Nawrocki, S. (2004) · Journal of Forensic and Sciences · doi:10.1520/jfs2003348 · Cited by 194
Contribution of the study of acetabulum for the estimation of adult subjects
Rougé-Maillart, C., Jousset, N., Vielle, B., Gaudin, A., & Telmon, N. (2007) · Forensic Science International · doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.10.007 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Yaşar İşcan, M., Loth, Sr., & Wright, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Forensic Sciences
- Publisher
- ASTM International
- Published
- 1985-07-01
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 853-863
- ISSN
- 0022-1198 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4292168071
- Cited by
- 489
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Age Estimation from the Rib by Phase Analysis: White Females. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1520/jfs11018j
- The paper
- Yaşar İşcan, M., Loth, Sr., & Wright, R. (1985). Age Estimation from the Rib by Phase Analysis: White Females. Journal of Forensic Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1520/jfs11018j
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.