The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinguishing Hope and Optimism: Two Sides of a Coin, or Two Separate Coins?
Open accessAbstract
Structural equation modeling was used to test hypotheses about (a) the dimensionality of measures of dispositional hope (the Adult Hope Scale, AHS) and dispositional optimism (the Life Orientation Test, LOT), (b) the extent and source of conceptual overlap and divergence between hope and optimism, and (c) patterns of discriminant validity for each trait. Separate two-factor models best fit the hope (Agency and Pathways, r = .68) and optimism (Optimism and Pessimism, r = -.63) data. Analyzing the combined AHS and LOT data, a measurement model with separate, correlated second-order factors of Hope and Optimism ( r = .80) provided a better fit than did a higher-order model with a single second-order factor. Optimism correlated equally with both Agency and Pathways, whereas Pessimism was more strongly correlated with Agency than with Pathways. Confirming hypotheses, second-order Optimism had a stronger influence on the use of positive reappraisal as a coping strategy than did second-order Hope, whereas second-order Hope had a stronger influence on level of general self-efficacy than did second-order Optimism. We suggest that hope focuses more directly on the personal attainment of specific goals, whereas optimism focuses more broadly on the expected quality of future outcomes in general.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Comparative fit indexes in structural models.
Bentler, P. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238 · Cited by 25,266
Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/1082-989x.3.4.424 · Cited by 12,298
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
Positive psychology: An introduction.
Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.5 · Cited by 11,351
Diener, E. (1984) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542 · Cited by 11,023
Scheier, M. F., Carver, C. S., & Bridges, M. W. (1994) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-3514.67.6.1063 · Cited by 7,456
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
Optimism, coping, and health: Assessment and implications of generalized outcome expectancies.
Scheier, M. F., & Carver, C. S. (1985) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/0278-6133.4.3.219 · Cited by 6,690 · cited 6×
“To assess dispositional optimism, Scheier and Carver (1985) constructed the Life Orientation Test (LOT) consisting of four statements designed to reflect optimism (e.g., “In uncertain times, I usually expect the best”; “I’m always optimistic about my future”), four statements designed to reflect…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale
Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037562 · Cited by 5,494
Cited by
POSITIVE PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL: MEASUREMENT AND RELATIONSHIP WITH PERFORMANCE AND SATISFACTION
LUTHANS, F., AVOLIO, B. J., AVEY, J. B., & NORMAN, S. M. (2007) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.2007.00083.x · Cited by 4,809
Experimental analysis of a web-based training intervention to develop positive psychological capital
Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., & Patera, J. L. (2008) · Academy of Management Learning & Education · doi:10.5465/amle.2008.32712618 · Cited by 900
Great expectations: a meta-analytic examination of optimism and hope.
Alarcon, G. M., Bowling, N. A., & Khazon, S. (2013) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.004 · Cited by 531
Feldman, D. B., & Kubota, M. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.022 · Cited by 422
Gallagher, M. W., Long, L. J., & Phillips, C. A. (2020) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.22882 · Cited by 264
Hope and Goal Attainment: Testing a Basic Prediction of Hope Theory
Feldman, D. B., Rand, K. L., & Kahle-Wrobleski, K. (2009) · Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1521/jscp.2009.28.4.479 · Cited by 202
Boehm, J. K., Chen, Y., Koga, H., Mathur, M. B., Vie, L. L., & Kubzansky, L. D. (2018) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.117.310828 · Cited by 194
Associated factors of hope in cancer patients during treatment: A systematic literature review
Nierop‐van Baalen, C., Grypdonck, M., van Hecke, A., & Verhaeghe, S. (2020) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/jan.14344 · Cited by 105
Fish, R. A., Hogan, M. J., Morrison, T. G., Stewart, I., & McGuire, B. E. (2013) · The Journal of Pain · doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2012.11.004 · Cited by 73
Welch, R. D., & Houser, M. E. (2010) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407509349632 · Cited by 71
Becerra, D., Androff, D., Cimino, A., Alex Wagaman, M., & Blanchard, K. N. (2013) · Race and Social Problems · doi:10.1007/s12552-012-9084-4 · Cited by 59
Jovanović (2014) · doi:10.1007/s10902-013-9432-0 · Cited by 50
Metadata
- Authors
- Bryant, F. B., & Cvengros, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2004-04
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-302
- ISSN
- 0736-7236 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044405689
- Cited by
- 413
- References
- 15
- FWCI
- 10.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
