Cited by 126Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyReliability and Agreement in MeasurementPersonality Traits and Psychology

Short-Interval Test-Retest Interrater Reliability of the Dutch Version of the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II)

Weertman, Anoek, ArntZ, Arnoud, Dreessen, Laura, Velzen, Carol van, Vertommen, Stefaan·2003·Journal of Personality Disorders

Abstract

This study examined the short-interval test-retest reliability of the Structured Clinical Interview (SCID-II: First, Spitzer, Gibbon, & Williams, 1995) for DSM-IV personality disorders (PDs). The SCID-II was administered to 69 in- and outpatients on two occasions separated by 1 to 6 weeks. The interviews were conducted at three sites by ten raters. Each rater acted as first and as second rater and equal number of times. The test-retest interrater reliability for the presence or absence of any PD was fair to good (kappa = .63) and was higher than values found in previous short-interval test-retest studies with the SCID-II for DSM-III-R. Test-retest reliability coefficients for trait and sumscores were sufficient, except for dependent PD. Values for single criteria were variable, ranging from poor to good agreement. Further large-scale test-retest research is needed to test the interrater reliability of more categorical diagnoses and single traits.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/pedi.17.6.562.25359

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weertman, A., ArntZ, A., Dreessen, L., Velzen, C. V., & Vertommen, S.
Affiliations
Maastricht University (NL)
Venue
Journal of Personality Disorders
Published
2003-12
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
562-567
ISSN
0885-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142845236
Cited by
126
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
Keywords
SCID-II, personality disorders, test-retest reliability, inter-rater reliability, DSM-IV, Dutch version, dependent personality disorder, diagnostic agreement, personality traits
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Female, Humans, Interview, Psychological, Male, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Personality Disorders, Reproducibility of Results, Observer Variation, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review