Cited by 112Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyMental Health Research Topics

Charting the Future of Axis II

Oldham, John M., Skodol, Andrew E.·2000·Journal of Personality Disorders

Abstract

Although there is general agreement that personality disorders are best conceptualized dimensionally, reflecting continuity with normal personality types, personality disorder traits, and personality disorders themselves, categorical systems continue to be utilized for clinical diagnostic purposes. The arguments for and against each approach are reviewed, and a proposal is presented for DSM-V that involves elements of both.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/pedi.2000.14.1.17

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Dimensional representations of personality disorders outperform categorical diagnoses in predicting external variables.

    “Dimensional representations of PDs have been shown to outperform categorical diagnoses in predicting external variables [28, 33]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oldham, J. M., & Skodol, A. E.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University Irving Medical Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality Disorders
Published
2000-03
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
17-29
ISSN
0885-579X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977597648
Cited by
112
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
personality disorders, Axis II, DSM-V, dimensional models, categorical classification, personality disorder traits, personality disorder diagnosis
MeSH terms
Humans, Personality Disorders, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review