CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 360Personality Disorders and PsychopathologyPersonality Traits and PsychologyMental Health and Psychiatry

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 118 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Personality Disorders in DSM-5

Skodol, Andrew E.·2012·Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
DOI 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143131
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

A substantive revision of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) last occurred in 1994; therefore, the mental health field should anticipate significant changes to the classification of mental disorders in the fifth edition. Since DSM-5 Work Groups have recently proposed revisions for the major diagnostic classes of mental disorders, an article on the current status of the personality disorders (PDs) is timely. This article reviews scientific principles that have influenced the development of proposed changes for the assessment and diagnosis of personality psychopathology in DSM-5, presents the proposed model as of the summer of 2011, summarizes rationales for the changes, and discusses critiques of the model. Scientific principles were articulated for DSM-5 more than a decade ago; their application to the process has not been straightforward, however. Work Group members have labored to improve the DSM-5 approach to personality and PDs to make the classification more valid and more clinically useful. The current model continues to be a work in progress.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143131

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The chair of the work group said NPD was reinstated due, in part, to comments posted on the official website bemoaning its deletion as a specific PD.

    “The chair of the work group said that it was reinstated due, in part, to the comments posted on the official website “bemoaning its deletion as a specific PD” (Skodol 2012, p. 331).”

    From Controversies in Narcissism (2017) · cites this paper as Skodol 2012

  • Both the DSM-5 (Section III) and the ICD-11 recommend using a hybrid model of diagnosis, which combines the categorical and dimensional models, because this combination has the strongest predictive validity.

    “Both the DSM-5 (Section III) (1) and the ICD-11 (13) recommend using a hybrid model of diagnosis, which combines the categorical and dimensional models, because this combination has the strongest predictive validity (9, 14).”

    From Narcissistic Personality Disorder: Progress in Understanding and Treatment (2022) · cites this paper as [14]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Costa PT, 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual
  2. First MB, 1997, Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (SCID-II)
  3. Livesley WJ, 2000, Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology
  4. Rounsaville BJ, 2002, A Research Agenda for DSM-V, 1
  5. Skodol AE, 2009, Essentials of Personality Disorders, 381
  6. Tellegen A, 1994, Personality Measures: Development and Evaluation, 1, 133
  7. Torgersen S, 2009, Essentials of Personality Disorders, 83

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Skodol, A. E.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Skodol, Andrew E.
Venue
Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
Publisher
Annual Reviews
Published
2012-04-27
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
317-344
ISSN
  • 1548-5943 (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-5951
DOI
10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032511-143131
OpenAlex
W2124226322
Cited by
360
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 38 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annual Review of Clinical Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
personality disorders, DSM-5, diagnostic classification, personality pathology, diagnostic criteria, classification validity, psychiatric diagnosis, personality disorder assessment
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Psychological, Personality Disorders, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review