The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Framework for Integrating Dimensional and Categorical Classifications of Personality Disorder
Abstract
Although empirical evidence strongly supports a dimensional representation of personality disorder, there is strong resistance to dimensional classification due in part to concerns about clinical utility. Acceptance of an evidence-based dimensional classification would be facilitated by information on how such a system would map onto existing diagnoses. With this objective in mind, an integrated framework is proposed that combines categorical and dimensional diagnoses. A two-component classification is adopted that distinguishes between the diagnosis of general personality disorder and the assessment of individual differences in the form the disorder takes. Then, the DSM definition of personality disorders is extended by defining individual disorders as categories of trait dimensions. This makes it possible to develop an integrated classification organized around a set of empirically derived primary traits. Assessments of these traits may then be combined to generate categorical and dimensional diagnoses. It is argued that this approach would introduce an etiological perspective into the classification of personality disorder and improve categorical classification by providing an explicit definition of each diagnosis. The clinical utility of incorporating a dimensional classification is discussed in terms of convenience and acceptability, value in predicting outcomes and treatment planning, and usefulness in organizing and selecting interventions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Heritability of borderline personality disorder features is similar across three countries
Distel, M. A., Trull, T. J., Derom, C. A., Thiery, E. W., Grimmer, M. A., Martin, N. G., Willemsen, G., & Boomsma, D. I. (2008) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291707002024 · Cited by 203
Charting the Future of Axis II
Oldham, J. M., & Skodol, A. E. (2000) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2000.14.1.17 · Cited by 112
Cited by
Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5
Krueger, R. F., Derringer, J., Markon, K. E., Watson, D., & Skodol, A. E. (2012) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291711002674 · Cited by 1,908
Psychopathy as a Clinical and Empirical Construct
Hare, R. D., & Neumann, C. S. (2008) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.3.022806.091452 · Cited by 1,431
Pathological narcissism and narcissistic personality disorder
Pincus, A. L., & Lukowitsky, M. R. (2010) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.121208.131215 · Cited by 1,082
Deriving an Empirical Structure of Personality Pathology for DSM-5
Krueger, R. F., Eaton, N. R., Clark, L. A., Watson, D., Markon, K. E., Derringer, J., Skodol, A., & Livesley, W. J. (2011) · Journal of Personality Disorders · doi:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.170 · Cited by 294
Self-citationBeauchaine, T. P., Klein, D. N., Crowell, S. E., Derbidge, C., & Gatzke-Kopp, L. (2009) · Development and Psychopathology · doi:10.1017/s0954579409000418 · Cited by 264
Metadata
- Authors
- Livesley, W. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Personality Disorders
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2007-04
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 199-224
- ISSN
- 0885-579X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2155487923
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 18.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Framework for Integrating Dimensional and Categorical Classifications of Personality Disorder. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.199
- The paper
- Livesley, W. J. (2007). A Framework for Integrating Dimensional and Categorical Classifications of Personality Disorder. Journal of Personality Disorders. https://doi.org/10.1521/pedi.2007.21.2.199
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.