Cited by 61Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesParticipatory Visual Research Methods

I don't know how to find my way in the world": contributions of user-led research to transforming mental health practice

Davidson, Larry, Shaw, Judith, Welborn, Selina, Mahon, Brian, Sirota, Margaret, Gilbo, Paul, McDermid, Michael, Fazio, James +3 more·2010·Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of forces have converged to promote participatory research in mental health. AIM: To present the findings of a user-led project in which eight people in recovery conducted narrative interviews with 80 peers. METHOD: Interviews focused on what participants' lives were like, what they would like their lives to be like, the role of mental health services, and how they would choose to spend their mental health dollars. Researchers used qualitative analysis to identify key themes from the first 30 interviews. RESULTS: Participants described multiple, profound losses and feeling that they were existing day-to-day, with their symptoms under control but not knowing how to make their way in the world. They suggested it would be useful to have a "map" to guide them back to a normal life, and reported that mental health care was most useful when it attended both to controlling illness and enabling them to rebuild an ordinary life. If they had the choice, they would spend their mental health dollars at this point primarily on having other people act as guides in pursuit of normal activities that interest them. CONCLUSION: Mental health care can be more effective in helping people join in to normal activities.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/psyc.2010.73.2.101

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Opportunities to engage in personally and socially meaningful activities have consistently been identified by people living with severe mental illness as an important element of personal recovery.

    “Furthermore, opportunities to engage in personally and socially meaningful activities have consistently been identified by people living with severe mental illness as an important element of personal recovery, a process that differs individually but broadly involves creating a life of well-being and meaning with or without the continuing presence of illness (23–26).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Davidson, L., Shaw, J., Welborn, S., Mahon, B., Sirota, M., Gilbo, P., McDermid, M., Fazio, J., Gilbert, C., Breetz, S., & Pelletier, J.-F.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes
Published
2010-06
Volume
73
Issue
2
Pages
101-113
ISSN
0033-2747 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2103539670
Cited by
61
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
Keywords
user-led research, participatory research, mental health recovery, peer support, lived experience, mental health services, mental health funding, social reintegration, narrative interviews
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Communication, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Mental Health, Mental Health Services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review