Cited by 13Mental Health and Patient InvolvementParticipatory Visual Research MethodsPsychiatric care and mental health services

A journey of living well: a participatory photovoice study exploring recovery and everyday activities with people experiencing mental illness

Doroud, Nastaran, Fossey, Ellie, Fortune, Tracy, Brophy, Lisa, Mountford, Louise·2022·Journal of Mental Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Engagement in everyday activities has been identified as an important element in personal recovery from the experience of mental illness and a key priority for service-users. This study explored the role of everyday activities in recovery. METHOD: This study used a photovoice participatory research. Twenty-one participants experiencing mental illness were recruited from a community-managed mental health service in Melbourne, Australia. Data collection included individual interviews and photovoice courses. The courses included group discussions and required participants to take photographs about their everyday activities that support recovery. A lived experience co-facilitator contributed to development and delivery of the course. The interviews and group discussions were transcribed verbatim and analysed using constant comparative methods. RESULTS: Recovery as a "journey of living well" was identified as the central theme that encompasses three interlinked categories: (1) living a life on hold; (2) choosing to recover; and (3) learning and navigating strategies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that recovery involves a range of experiences embedded in people's everyday lives. Recovery-oriented practice should provide opportunities for engagement in meaningful activities, to help consumers identify their potential and strategies to live well, and to adopt co-production at all levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09638237.2021.1952950

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The potential of engagement in self-chosen activities to support personal recovery lies in their capacity to create conditions for building hope, meaning and purpose in life, developing social connections in communities of choice and ways of self-managing one's health in everyday life.

    “The potential of engagement in self-chosen activities to support personal recovery lies in their capacity to create conditions for building hope, meaning and purpose in life, developing social connections in communities of choice and ways of self-managing one’s health in everyday life (27–29).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Doroud, N., Fossey, E., Fortune, T., Brophy, L., & Mountford, L.
Affiliations
  • La Trobe University (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Doroud, Nastaran
Venue
Journal of Mental Health
Published
2021-07-16
Volume
31
Issue
2
Pages
246-254
ISSN
  • 0963-8237 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0567
OpenAlex
W3177855899
Cited by
13
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2
FWCI
2.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Mental Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Participatory Visual Research Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
mental illness, personal recovery, everyday activities, living well, photovoice, recovery-oriented care, meaningful activities, co-production, service user engagement
MeSH terms
Australia, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review