Cited by 65Social and Intergroup PsychologyRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Black and White: The Role of Color Bias in Implicit Race Bias

Smith–McLallen, Aaron, Johnson, Blair T., Dovidio, John F., Pearson, Adam R.·2006·Social Cognition

Abstract

Research using the Implicit Association Test (IAT) has consistently shown that White participants demonstrate an implicit preference for White, race–related stimuli over similar Black stimuli. Scholars in many domains have also documented that people generally have more positive associations with the color white and more negative associations with the color black. The present research, consisting of three studies, examined the potential contribution of general implicit evaluative associations with the colors white and black to implicit race preferences as measured by the IAT. Across three studies, evaluative associations with the colors white and black were significantly related to evaluative racial associations. Nevertheless, implicit preferences for Whites relative to Blacks remained significant after controlling for the effect of implicit color preferences. Results support the position that racial IAT responses substantially reflect racial evaluative associations. Theoretical and methodological issues related to the assessment of implicit racial biases are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/soco.2006.24.1.46

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The basis of differential associations between white and black stems from early tribal fears of the night, dark, unknown, and unseen, dispelled by light of fire, moon, or sun.

    “Additionally, it is argued that the basis of these differential associations between these colors stem from early tribal fears of the night, the dark, the unknown, and the unseen, all of which are dispelled by the light of fire, the moon, or the sun (Smith-McLallen et al., 2006).”

    From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Smith-McLallen et al., 2006

  • In Western culture, the color words 'white' and 'black' have often symbolically been in opposition, with 'white' carrying more positive connotations than 'black'.

    “In Western culture the etymology of the color words 'white' and 'black' has often symbolically been in opposition (Curta, 2004;Cirlot, 2006;Hunt, 2006;Selnick, 2012), with 'white' carrying more positive connotations than the color 'black' (Smith-McLallen et al., 2006).”

    From Of Rarity and Symbolism: Understanding Human Perceptions of Charismatic Color Morphs (2024) · cites this paper as Smith-McLallen et al., 2006

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smith–McLallen, A., Johnson, B. T., Dovidio, J. F., & Pearson, A. R.
Affiliations
University of Connecticut (US)
Venue
Social Cognition
Published
2006-02
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
46-73
ISSN
0278-016X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2011289823
Cited by
65
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Social Cognition (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
color bias, Implicit Association Test, evaluative associations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review