Cited by 191Behavioral Health and InterventionsFree Will and AgencyGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Action Control by Implementation Intentions: Effective Cue Detection and Efficient Response Initiation

Parks–Stamm, Elizabeth J., Gollwitzer, Peter M., Oettingen, Gabriele·2007·Social Cognition

Abstract

Past research has demonstrated that implementation intentions (i.e., if–then plans) facilitate goal striving by two processes: increasing the activation of the anticipated situational cue (the if–process) and automating the goal–directed response to that cue (the then–process; Gollwitzer, 1999; Webb & Sheeran, in press). Two studies investigated the implications for the course of goal striving guided by implementation intentions. When implementation intentions achieved their effects by facilitating cue identification (the if–process), alternative cues were disregarded (Study 1). On the contrary, when implementation intentions achieved their effects by the automation of the critical response (the then–process), alternative goal–directed responses were still considered (Study 2). We discuss these results with respect to the functioning of implementation intentions and the use of alternative means in planned goal pursuit.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/soco.2007.25.2.248

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implementation intentions activate the mental representation of the situational cue specified in the if-part, enhancing attention, memory and processing of the cue.

    “First, implementation intentions have been shown to activate the mental representation of the situational cue specified in the if‐part of the plan, thus enhancing attention, memory and processing of the situational cue (e.g. Achtziger et al., 2012; Janczyk et al., 2015; Parks‐Stamm et al., 2007).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.78.1.53 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<971::AID-EJSP963>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
  3. 10.1037/0022-3514.81.5.946 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1111/1467-9280.00385 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/1467-9280.00290 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/0894-4105.15.1.80 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02823.x · DOI
  8. 10.1016/0001-6918(70)90122-8 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1261 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00005-7 · DOI
  11. 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1109 · DOI
  12. 10.1037/0278-6133.19.3.283 · DOI
  13. 10.1348/1359107042304551 · DOI
  14. 10.1002/ejsp.205 · DOI
  15. 10.1037/0033-295X.101.1.34 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Parks–Stamm, E. J., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Oettingen, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Konstanz (DE)
  • Universität Hamburg (DE)
Venue
Social Cognition
Published
2007-04
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
248-266
ISSN
0278-016X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1980540325
Cited by
191
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
18.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • KOPS (University of Konstanz) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Free Will and Agency
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
implementation intentions, action control, goal pursuit, cue detection, response initiation, goal-directed behavior, if-then planning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review