Cited by 579Behavioral Health and InterventionsDecision-Making and Behavioral EconomicsMedia Influence and Health

Nonconscious processes and health.

Sheeran, Paschal, Gollwitzer, Peter M., Bargh, John A.·2013·Health Psychology

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Health behavior theories focus on the role of conscious, reflective factors (e.g., behavioral intentions, risk perceptions) in predicting and changing behavior. Dual-process models, on the other hand, propose that health actions are guided not only by a conscious, reflective, rule-based system but also by a nonconscious, impulsive, associative system. This article argues that research on health decisions, actions, and outcomes will be enriched by greater consideration of nonconscious processes. METHODS: A narrative review is presented that delineates research on implicit cognition, implicit affect, and implicit motivation. In each case, we describe the key ideas, how they have been taken up in health psychology, and the possibilities for behavior change interventions, before outlining directions that might profitably be taken in future research. RESULTS: Correlational research on implicit cognitive and affective processes (attentional bias and implicit attitudes) has recently been supplemented by intervention studies using implementation intentions and practice-based training that show promising effects. Studies of implicit motivation (health goal priming) have also observed encouraging findings. There is considerable scope for further investigations of implicit affect control, unconscious thought, and the automatization of striving for health goals. CONCLUSION: Research on nonconscious processes holds significant potential that can and should be developed by health psychologists. Consideration of impulsive as well as reflective processes will engender new targets for intervention and should ultimately enhance the effectiveness of behavior change efforts.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0029203

Cites

171 of 171 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research in unconscious processes has ranked habit as possibly the strongest unconscious determinant of behavior.

    “By contrast, research in unconscious processes have ranked habit as possibly the strongest unconscious determinant of behavior (Sheeran et al., 2013).”

    From Exercise habit formation in new gym members: a longitudinal study (2015) · cites this paper as Sheeran et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sheeran, P., Gollwitzer, P. M., & Bargh, J. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
  • New York University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2013
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
460-473
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W1999699043
Cited by
579
References
171
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 1
FWCI
40.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Economic and Social Research Council (000–22-0262 and 060–25-0044)
  • German Research Foundation
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
Keywords
unconscious processes, implicit cognition, implicit affect, implicit motivation, dual-process models, health behavior change, implementation intentions, practice-based training, attentional bias, implicit attitudes, unconscious thought, behaviour change interventions
MeSH terms
Affect, Cognition, Humans, Mental Processes, Models, Psychological, Motivation, Unconscious, Psychology, Health Behavior, Risk Assessment, Intention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review