Cited by 91Social and Intergroup PsychologyMemory Processes and InfluencesConsumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification

Liking What's Familiar: The Importance of Unconscious Familiarity in the Mere-Exposure Effect

Open access
Hansen, Jochim, Wänke, Michaela·2009·Social Cognition

Abstract

Although previous research on the mere-exposure effect has shown that unconscious familiarity may play an important role in attitude formation, it is still unclear whether unconscious familiarity is associated with attitudes even when conscious recognition is present. The present research fills this gap. In two experiments, conscious and unconscious memory contributions to recognition were estimated with the process-dissociation procedure. Additionally, both influences were varied independently of each other. In Experiment 1, the level of conscious recognition was manipulated by distracting participants during the presentation of novel brand names. Prior exposure increased attitudes independently of the level of distraction. Moreover, attitudes correlated positively with unconscious familiarity but not with conscious recognition. In Experiment 2, unconscious familiarity was manipulated by contrast intervals in radio advertisements. Enhancing unconscious familiarity also increased liking for the names. The results suggest that repeated exposure affects attitude formation independently of conscious recognition and stress the role of unconscious familiarity in attitude formation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1521/soco.2009.27.2.161

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Hansen & Wänke (2009) experimentally validated the functional independence of the recollection and familiarity estimates provided by the process-dissociation procedure.

    “A noteworthy feature of Hansen &Wänke's study is that the authors experimentally validated the functional independence of the recollection and familiarity estimates provided by the process-dissociation procedure.”

    From Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects (2025) · cites this paper as Hansen & Wänke 2009

  • Hansen & Wänke (2009) found that repeated high-strength exposure to product names increased participants' liking of these names, and this ME effect was associated with feelings of familiarity but not with conscious recollection.

    “They found that repeated high-strength exposure to the product names increased participants' liking of these names, and that this ME effect was associated with feelings of familiarity but not with conscious recollection.”

    From Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects (2025) · cites this paper as Hansen & Wänke 2009

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hansen, J., & Wänke, M.
Affiliations
University of Basel (CH)
Venue
Social Cognition
Published
2009-04
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
161-182
ISSN
0278-016X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166672669
Cited by
91
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
11.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
Keywords
mere exposure effect, attitude formation, repeated exposure, brand names, radio advertising, process dissociation, consumer liking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review