Liking What's Familiar: The Importance of Unconscious Familiarity in the Mere-Exposure Effect
Open accessAbstract
Although previous research on the mere-exposure effect has shown that unconscious familiarity may play an important role in attitude formation, it is still unclear whether unconscious familiarity is associated with attitudes even when conscious recognition is present. The present research fills this gap. In two experiments, conscious and unconscious memory contributions to recognition were estimated with the process-dissociation procedure. Additionally, both influences were varied independently of each other. In Experiment 1, the level of conscious recognition was manipulated by distracting participants during the presentation of novel brand names. Prior exposure increased attitudes independently of the level of distraction. Moreover, attitudes correlated positively with unconscious familiarity but not with conscious recognition. In Experiment 2, unconscious familiarity was manipulated by contrast intervals in radio advertisements. Enhancing unconscious familiarity also increased liking for the names. The results suggest that repeated exposure affects attitude formation independently of conscious recognition and stress the role of unconscious familiarity in attitude formation.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hansen & Wänke (2009) experimentally validated the functional independence of the recollection and familiarity estimates provided by the process-dissociation procedure.
“A noteworthy feature of Hansen &Wänke's study is that the authors experimentally validated the functional independence of the recollection and familiarity estimates provided by the process-dissociation procedure.”
From Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects (2025) · cites this paper as Hansen & Wänke 2009
Hansen & Wänke (2009) found that repeated high-strength exposure to product names increased participants' liking of these names, and this ME effect was associated with feelings of familiarity but not with conscious recollection.
“They found that repeated high-strength exposure to the product names increased participants' liking of these names, and that this ME effect was associated with feelings of familiarity but not with conscious recollection.”
From Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects (2025) · cites this paper as Hansen & Wänke 2009
Cites
Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987.
Bornstein, R. F. (1989) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265 · Cited by 1,970 · cited 4× · see citing works
“147, replicating the well-established MEE (Bornstein, 1989; Zajonc, 1968).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialEffects of message repetition and position on cognitive response, recall, and persuasion.
Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1979) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.97 · Cited by 813 · see citing works
Preattentive Mere Exposure Effects
Janiszewski, C. (1993) · Journal of Consumer Research · doi:10.1086/209356 · Cited by 455 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Walter, N., & Tukachinsky, R. (2020) · Communication Research · doi:10.1177/0093650219854600 · Cited by 522 · see citing works
Unawareness of Attitudes, Their Environmental Causes, and Their Behavioral Effects
Gawronski, B., & Corneille, O. (2025) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-051324-031037 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hansen, J., & Wänke, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- Venue
- Social Cognition
- Publisher
- Guilford Publications
- Published
- 2009-04
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-182
- ISSN
- 0278-016X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2166672669
- Cited by
- 91
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 11.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- Social Cognition (publishedVersion)
- edoc (University of Basel) (acceptedVersion)
- edoc (University of Basel)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
- Keywords
- mere exposure effect, attitude formation, repeated exposure, brand names, radio advertising, process dissociation, consumer liking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review