Cited by 16Neurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchIon Channels and Receptors

Nonspiking Interneurons in the Drosophila Antennal Lobe Exhibit Spatially Restricted Activity

Open access
Schenk, Jonathan E., Gaudry, Quentin·2023·eneuro

Abstract

Inhibitory interneurons are important for neuronal circuit function. They regulate sensory inputs and enhance output discriminability (Olsen and Wilson, 2008; Root et al., 2008; Olsen et al., 2010). Often, the identities of interneurons can be determined by location and morphology, which can have implications for their functions (Wachowiak and Shipley, 2006). While most interneurons fire traditional action potentials, many are nonspiking. These can be seen in insect olfaction (Laurent and Davidowitz, 1994; Husch et al., 2009; Tabuchi et al., 2015) and the vertebrate retina (Gleason et al., 1993). Here, we present the novel observation of nonspiking inhibitory interneurons in the antennal lobe (AL) of the adult fruit fly,Drosophila melanogaster. These neurons have a morphology where they innervate a patchwork of glomeruli. We used electrophysiology to determine whether their nonspiking characteristic is because of a lack of sodium current. We then used immunohistochemsitry and in situ hybridization to show this is likely achieved through translational regulation of the voltage-gated sodium channel gene,para. Using in vivo calcium imaging, we explored how these cells respond to odors, finding regional isolation in their responses’ spatial patterns. Further, their response patterns were dependent on both odor identity and concentration. Thus, we surmise these neurons are electrotonically compartmentalized such that activation of the neurites in one region does not propagate across the whole antennal lobe. We propose these neurons may be the source of intraglomerular inhibition in the AL and may contribute to regulation of spontaneous activity within glomeruli.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/eneuro.0109-22.2022

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some NSRNs have been shown to have compartmentalized activity, raising the possibility of local computation.

    “Some have been shown to have compartmentalized activity, raising the possibility of local computation45,46.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 51

  1. Amin H, Apostolopoulou AA, Suárez-Grimalt R, Vrontou E, Lin AC (2020) Localized inhibition in the Drosophila mushroom body. Elife 9: e56954. 10.7554/eLife.56954 32955437 PMC7541083 · DOI
  2. Aungst JL, Heyward PM, Puche AC, Karnup SV, Hayar A, Szabo G, Shipley MT (2003) Centre-surround inhibition among olfactory bulb glomeruli. Nature 426: 623– 629. 10.1038/nature02185 14668854 · DOI
  3. Bargmann CI (2006) Comparative chemosensation from receptors to ecology. Nature 444: 295– 301. 10.1038/nature05402 17108953 · DOI
  4. Becker K, Bluhm A, Casas-Vila N, Dinges N, Dejung M, Sayols S, Kreutz C, Roignant JY, Butter F, Legewie S (2018) Quantifying post-transcriptional regulation in the development of Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Commun 9: 4970. 10.1038/s41467-018-07455-9 30478415 PMC6255845 · DOI
  5. Behnia R, Clark DA, Carter AG, Clandinin TR, Desplan C (2014) Processing properties of on and off pathways for Drosophila motion detection. Nature 512: 427– 430. 10.1038/nature13427 25043016 PMC4243710 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Bhandawat V, Olsen SR, Gouwens NW, Schlief ML, Wilson RI (2007) Sensory processing in the Drosophila antennal lobe increases reliability and separability of ensemble odor representations. Nat Neurosci 10: 1474– 1482. 10.1038/nn1976 17922008 PMC2838615 · DOI
  7. Bloomfield SA (1992) Relationship between receptive and dendritic field size of amacrine cells in the rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol 68: 711– 725. 10.1152/jn.1992.68.3.711 1432044 · DOI
  8. Chou YH, Spletter ML, Yaksi E, Leong JCS, Wilson RI, Luo L (2010) Diversity and wiring variability of olfactory local interneurons in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Nat Neurosci 13: 439– 449. 10.1038/nn.2489 20139975 PMC2847188 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Chou YH, Yang CJ, Huang HW, Liou NF, Panganiban MR, Luginbuhl D, Yin Y, Taisz I, Liang L, Jefferis GSXE, Luo L (2022) Mating-driven variability in olfactory local interneuron wiring. Sci Adv 8: eabm7723. 10.1126/sciadv.abm7723 35179957 PMC8856614 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Couto A, Alenius M, Dickson BJ (2005) Molecular, anatomical, and functional organization of the Drosophila olfactory system. Curr Biol 15: 1535– 1547. 10.1016/j.cub.2005.07.034 16139208 · DOI
  11. Dana H, Sun Y, Mohar B, Hulse BK, Kerlin AM, Hasseman JP, Tsegaye G, Tsang A, Wong A, Patel R, Macklin JJ, Chen Y, Konnerth A, Jayaraman V, Looger LL, Schreiter ER, Svoboda K, Kim DS (2019) High-performance calcium sensors for imaging activity in neuronal populations and microcompartments. Nat Methods 16: 649– 657. 10.1038/s41592-019-0435-6 31209382 · DOI
  12. Davis FP, Nern A, Picard S, Reiser MB, Rubin GM, Eddy SR, Henry GL (2020) A genetic, genomic, and computational resource for exploring neural circuit function. Elife 9: e50901. 10.7554/eLife.50901 31939737 PMC7034979 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Dunn FA, Doan T, Sampath AP, Rieke F (2006) Controlling the gain of rod-mediated signals in the mammalian retina. J Neurosci 26: 3959– 3970. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5148-05.2006 16611812 PMC6673884 · DOI
  14. Fendl S, Vieira RM, Borst A (2020) Conditional protein tagging methods reveal highly specific subcellular distribution of ion channels in motion-sensing neurons. Elife 9: e62953. 10.7554/eLife.62953 33079061 PMC7655108 · DOI
  15. Franks KM (2015) I want it all and I want it now: how a neural circuit encodes odor with speed and accuracy. Neuron 88: 852– 854. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.016 26637793 · DOI
  16. Fusca D, Kloppenburg P (2021) Task-specific roles of local interneurons for inter- and intraglomerular signaling in the insect antennal lobe. Elife 10: e65217. 10.7554/eLife.65217 34554087 PMC8460249 · DOI
  17. Germeraad S, O’Dowd D, Aldrich RW (1992) Functional assay of a putative Drosophila sodium channel gene in homozygous deficiency neurons. J Neurogenet 8: 1– 16. 10.3109/01677069209167268 1313499 · DOI
  18. Gleason E, Borges S, Wilson M (1993) Synaptic transmission between pairs of retinal amacrine cells in culture. J Neurosci 13: 2359– 2370. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.13-06-02359.1993 8099124 PMC6576475 · DOI
  19. Grimes WN, Zhang J, Graydon CW, Kachar B, Diamond JS (2010) Retinal parallel processors: more than 100 independent microcircuits operate within a single interneuron. Neuron 65: 873– 885. 10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.028 20346762 PMC2967021 · DOI
  20. Gruntman E, Reimers P, Romani S, Reiser MB (2021) Non-preferred contrast responses in the Drosophila motion pathways reveal a receptive field structure that explains a common visual illusion. Curr Biol 31: 5286– 5298.e7. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.072 34672960 · DOI
  21. Hallem EA, Carlson JR (2006) Coding of odors by a receptor repertoire. Cell 125: 143– 160. 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.050 16615896 · DOI
  22. Husch A, Paehler M, Fusca D, Paeger L, Kloppenburg P (2009) Distinct electrophysiological properties in subtypes of nonspiking olfactory local interneurons correlate with their cell type–specific Ca2+ current profiles. J Neurophysiol 102: 2834– 2845. 10.1152/jn.00627.2009 19759323 · DOI
  23. Inada K, Tsuchimoto Y, Kazama H (2017) Origins of cell-type-specific olfactory processing in the Drosophila mushroom body circuit. Neuron 95: 357– 367.e4. 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.039 28728024 · DOI
  24. Jeanne JM, Wilson RI (2015) Convergence, divergence, and reconvergence in a feedforward network improves neural speed and accuracy. Neuron 88: 1014– 1026. 10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.018 26586183 PMC5488793 · DOI
  25. Kazama H, Wilson RI (2008) Homeostatic matching and nonlinear amplification at identified central synapses. Neuron 58: 401– 413. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.02.030 18466750 PMC2429849 · DOI
  26. Kohn JR, Portes JP, Christenson MP, Abbott LF, Behnia R (2021) Flexible filtering by neural inputs supports motion computation across states and stimuli. Curr Biol 31: 5249– 5260.e5. 10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.061 34670114 PMC8725177 · DOI
  27. Laurent G, Davidowitz H (1994) Encoding of olfactory information with oscillating neural assemblies. Science 265: 1872– 1875. 10.1126/science.265.5180.1872 17797226 · DOI
  28. Leitch B, Laurent G (1996) GABAergic synapses in the antennal lobe and mushroom body of the locust olfactory system. J Comp Neurol 372: 487– 514. 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(19960902)372:4<487::AID-CNE1>3.0.CO;2-0 8876449 · DOI
  29. Liu WW, Wilson RI (2013) Glutamate is an inhibitory neurotransmitter in the Drosophila olfactory system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 10294– 10299. 10.1073/pnas.1220560110 23729809 PMC3690841 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Molleman A (2002) Patch clamping: an introductory guide to patch clamp electrophysiology. West Sussex: Wiley.
  31. Muraro NI, Weston AJ, Gerber AP, Luschnig S, Moffat KG, Baines RA (2008) Pumilio binds para mRNA and requires nanos and brat to regulate sodium current in Drosophila motoneurons. J Neurosci 28: 2099– 2109. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5092-07.2008 18305244 PMC2323674 · DOI
  32. Murphy GJ, Darcy DP, Isaacson JS (2005) Intraglomerular inhibition: signaling mechanisms of an olfactory microcircuit. Nat Neurosci 8: 354– 364. 10.1038/nn1403 15696160 · DOI
  33. Oizumi M, Satoh R, Kazama H, Okada M (2012) Functional differences between global pre- and postsynaptic inhibition in the Drosophila olfactory circuit. Front Comput Neurosci 6: 14. 10.3389/fncom.2012.00014 22470334 PMC3309306 · DOI
  34. Olsen SR, Wilson RI (2008) Lateral presynaptic inhibition mediates gain control in an olfactory circuit. Nature 452: 956– 960. 10.1038/nature06864 18344978 PMC2824883 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Ravenscroft TA, Janssens J, Lee PT, Tepe B, Marcogliese PC, Makhzami S, Holmes TC, Aerts S, Bellen HJ (2020) Drosophila voltage-gated sodium channels are only expressed in active neurons and are localized to distal axonal initial segment-like domains. J Neurosci 40: 7999– 8024. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0142-20.2020 32928889 PMC7574647 · DOI
  36. Root CM, Masuyama K, Green DS, Enell LE, Nässel DR, Lee CH, Wang JW (2008) A presynaptic gain control mechanism fine-tunes olfactory behavior. Neuron 59: 311– 321. 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.003 18667158 PMC2539065 · DOI
  37. Root CM, Ko KI, Jafari A, Wang JW (2011) Presynaptic facilitation by neuropeptide signaling mediates odor-driven food search. Cell 145: 133– 144. 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.008 21458672 PMC3073827 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Seki Y, Rybak J, Wicher D, Sachse S, Hansson BS (2010) Physiological and morphological characterization of local interneurons in the Drosophila antennal lobe. J Neurophysiol 104: 1007– 1019. 10.1152/jn.00249.2010 20505124 · DOI
  39. Siddiqi O, Benzer S (1976) Neurophysiological defects in temperature-sensitive paralytic mutants of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 73: 3253– 3257. 10.1073/pnas.73.9.3253 184469 PMC430996 · DOI
  40. Silbering AF, Rytz R, Grosjean Y, Abuin L, Ramdya P, Jefferis GSXE, Benton R (2011) Complementary function and integrated wiring of the evolutionarily distinct Drosophila olfactory subsystems. J Neurosci 31: 13357– 13375. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2360-11.2011 21940430 PMC6623294 · DOI
  41. Sizemore TR, Jonaitis J, Dacks AM (2022) A neuropeptidergic signaling pathway for olfactory gain modulation. bioRxiv 489804. 10.1101/2022.04.27.489804. · DOI
  42. Stocker RF, Lienhard MC, Borst A, Fischbach KF (1990) Neuronal architecture of the antennal lobe in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell Tissue Res 262: 9– 34. 10.1007/BF00327741 2124174 · DOI
  43. Suzuki Y, Schenk JE, Tan H, Gaudry Q (2020) A population of interneurons signals changes in the basal concentration of serotonin and mediates gain control in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Curr Biol 30: 1110– 1118.e4. 10.1016/j.cub.2020.01.018 32142699 PMC7133499 · DOI
  44. Tabuchi M, Dong L, Inoue S, Namiki S, Sakurai T, Nakatani K, Kanzaki R (2015) Two types of local interneurons are distinguished by morphology, intrinsic membrane properties, and functional connectivity in the moth antennal lobe. J Neurophysiol 114: 3002– 3013. 10.1152/jn.00050.2015 26378200 PMC4737418 · DOI
  45. Tanaka NK, Tanimoto H, Ito K (2008) Neuronal assemblies of the Drosophila mushroom body. J Comp Neurol 508: 711– 755. 10.1002/cne.21692 18395827 · DOI · Paper page
  46. Vosshall LB, Wong AM, Axel R (2000) An olfactory sensory map in the fly brain. Cell 102: 147– 159. 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00021-0 10943836 · DOI
  47. Wachowiak M, Shipley MT (2006) Coding and synaptic processing of sensory information in the glomerular layer of the olfactory bulb. Semin Cell Dev Biol 17: 411– 423. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2006.04.007 16765614 · DOI
  48. Wachowiak M, McGann JP, Heyward PM, Shao Z, Puche AC, Shipley MT (2005) Inhibition of olfactory receptor neuron input to olfactory bulb glomeruli mediated by suppression of presynaptic calcium influx. J Neurophysiol 94: 2700– 2712. 10.1152/jn.00286.2005 15917320 PMC1282456 · DOI
  49. Warmke JW, Reenan RAG, Wang P, Qian S, Arena JP, Wang J, Wunderler D, Liu K, Kaczorowski GJ, der Ploeg LHTV, Ganetzky B, Cohen CJ (1997) Functional expression of Drosophila para sodium channels. J Gen Physiol 110: 119– 133. 10.1085/jgp.110.2.119 9236205 PMC2233785 · DOI
  50. Wilson RI, Turner GC, Laurent G (2004) Transformation of olfactory representations in the Drosophila antennal lobe. Science 303: 366– 370. 14684826
  51. Zhou ZJ, Fain GL (1996) Starburst amacrine cells change from spiking to nonspiking neurons during retinal development. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 93: 8057– 8062. 10.1073/pnas.93.15.8057 8755602 PMC38874 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schenk, J. E., & Gaudry, Q.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Gaudry, Quentin
Venue
eneuro
Published
2023-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
ENEURO.0109-22.2022
ISSN
2373-2822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4317207918
Cited by
16
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • eNeuro (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (DC016293)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
Keywords
inhibitory interneurons, antennal lobe, Drosophila melanogaster, olfaction, voltage-gated sodium channels, para gene, translational regulation, olfactory response, glomeruli, spontaneous activity
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Animals, Drosophila, Drosophila melanogaster, Interneurons, Neurons, Odorants

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review