The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Enhancement of Planning Ability by Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
Open accessAbstract
The functional neuroanatomy of executive function critically involves the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been established as a noninvasive tool for transient modulation of cortical function. Here, we examined the effects of tDCS of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on planning function by using the Tower of London task to evaluate performance during and after anodal, cathodal (1 mA, 15 min), and sham tDCS in 24 healthy volunteers. The key finding was a double dissociation of polarity and training phase: improved performance was found with cathodal tDCS applied during acquisition and early consolidation, when preceding anodal tDCS, but not in the later training session. In contrast, anodal tDCS enhanced performance when applied in the later sessions following cathodal tDCS. Our results indicate that both anodal and cathodal tDCS can improve planning performance as quantified by the Tower of London test. Most importantly, these data demonstrate training-phase-specific effects of tDCS. We propose that excitability decreasing cathodal tDCS mediates its early beneficial effect through noise reduction of neuronal activity, whereas a further adaptive configuration of specific neuronal connections is supported by excitability enhancing anodal tDCS in the later training phase by enhanced efficacy of active connections. This gain of function was sustained in a follow-up 6 and 12 months after training. In conclusion, the specific coupling of stimulation and training phase interventions may support the treatment of cognitive disorders involving frontal lobe functions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is another promising, low-risk, noninvasive neuromodulation technique that has effects on inhibitory control, planning, delay discounting, and risk taking in healthy individuals (289-291).”
From A brain-centric model of suicidal behavior (2020) · cites this paper as [289]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ten-twenty electrode system of the international federation
Jasper, H. H. (1958) · Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology · Cited by 6,567
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2000) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7793.2000.t01-1-00633.x · Cited by 5,656
Specific impairments of planning
Shallice, T. (1982) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1982.0082 · Cited by 3,741
Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.57.10.1899 · Cited by 2,617
Klem, G. H., Lüders, H. O., Jasper, H. H., & Elger, C. E. (1999) · PubMed · Cited by 2,361
Nitsche, M. A., Fricke, K., Henschke, U., Schlitterlau, A., Liebetanz, D., Lang, N., Henning, S. J., Tergau, F., & Paulus, W. (2003) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2003.049916 · Cited by 1,587
Liebetanz, D. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf238 · Cited by 1,383
Increased prefrontal and parietal activity after training of working memory
Olesen, P. J., Westerberg, H., & Klingberg, T. (2004) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1165 · Cited by 1,317
Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of prefrontal cortex enhances working memory
Fregni, F., Boggio, P. S., Nitsche, M., Bermpohl, F., Antal, A., Feredoes, E., Marcolin, M. A., Rigonatti, S. P., Silva, M. T. A., Paulus, W., et al. (2005) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-005-2334-6 · Cited by 1,159
Safety aspects of transcranial direct current stimulation concerning healthy subjects and patients
Poreisz, C., Boros, K., Antal, A., & Paulus, W. (2007) · Brain Research Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2007.01.004 · Cited by 1,153
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Role of the Prefrontal Cortex in Pain Processing
Ong, W., Stohler, C. S., & Herr, D. R. (2018) · Molecular Neurobiology · doi:10.1007/s12035-018-1130-9 · Cited by 824
Keeser, D., Meindl, T., Bor, J., Palm, U., Pogarell, O. M., Mulert, C., Brunelin, J., Möller, H., Reiser, M. F., & Padberg, F. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0542-11.2011 · Cited by 615
Huang, Y., Liu, A. A., Lafon, B., Friedman, D. J., Dayan, M., Wang, X. H., Bikson, M., Doyle, W., Devinsky, O., & Parra, L. C. (2017) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.18834 · Cited by 567
Modelling non-invasive brain stimulation in cognitive neuroscience
Miniussi, C., Harris, J. A., & Ruzzoli, M. (2013) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.06.014 · Cited by 536
Transcranial direct current stimulation – update 2011
Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W. (2011) · Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience · doi:10.3233/rnn-2011-0618 · Cited by 544
Metadata
- Authors
- Dockery, C. A., Hueckel-Weng, R., Birbaumer, N., & Plewnia, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Tübingen (DE)
- IRCCS San Camillo Hospital (IT)
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2009-06-03
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 7271-7277
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC6666475
- OpenAlex
- W2138140054
- Cited by
- 380
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 25 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 12.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SFB 550)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- transcranial direct current stimulation, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, executive function, planning, Tower of London task, anodal stimulation, cathodal stimulation, polarity effect, training stages, cognitive training
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Analysis of Variance, Electric Stimulation, Female, Humans, Functional Laterality, Learning, Male, Mental Processes, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychomotor Performance, Reaction Time, Time Factors, Prefrontal Cortex, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
