The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Auditory and visual maps of space in the optic tectum of the owl
Open accessAbstract
The receptive field properties and functional organization of visual and auditory responses were studied in the optic tectum of the barn owl (Tyto alba). Most units throughout the depth of the tectum responded to both visual and auditory stimuli. The entire visual field of each eye was represented topographically in the contralateral tectum. In the portion of the tectal map representing the zone of binocular vision, 50% of the superficial layer units and 100% of the deep; layer units were driven binocularly. The representation of the frontal binocular region of space was greatly expanded in the map; the average magnification factor was 3 times greater for the frontal binocular zone than for the monocular zone. The responses of the superficial and deep tectal units to auditory stimuli were space specific; they responded only when a sound source was located in a particular region of space, or receptive field, regardless of the intensity or type of sound used. Most auditory receptive fields contained a distinct “best area” where a sound source was most effective in driving the unit. Auditory space, as defined by receptive fields and best areas, was represented topographically in the tectum. The auditory and visual maps of space had the same orientations, positions, magnification factors, and termination coordinates at the anterior and dorsal edges of the tectum. Yet the maps lost their registry near the posterior and ventral margins where the most peripheral regions of space were represented. These characteristics suggest that the spatiotopic organization in the tectum is a compromise between a tendency for the space representations of different modalities to align and for the representation of each modality to fill the entire tectum.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Meredith, M. A., & Stein, B. E. (1986) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.1986.56.3.640 · Cited by 1,183
SENSE AND THE SINGLE NEURON: Probing the Physiology of Perception
Parker, A. J., & Newsome, W. T. (1998) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.227 · Cited by 801
Instructed learning in the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl
Knudsen, E. I. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/417322a · Cited by 320
Self-citationDevelopmental mechanisms of topographic map formation and alignment
Cang, J., & Feldheim, D. A. (2013) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062012-170341 · Cited by 275
Merker, B. (2005) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/s1053-8100(03)00002-3 · Cited by 251
Visual Instruction of the Neural Map of Auditory Space in the Developing Optic Tectum
Knudsen, E. I., & Brainard, M. S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2063209 · Cited by 231
Self-citationNeural tuning and representational geometry
Kriegeskorte, N., & Wei, X.-X. (2021) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-021-00502-3 · Cited by 187
The tectum/superior colliculus as the vertebrate solution for spatial sensory integration and action
Isa, T., Marquez-Legorreta, E., Grillner, S., & Scott, E. K. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.04.001 · Cited by 206
Sensitive periods for visual calibration of the auditory space map in the barn owl optic tectum
Brainard, M. S., & Knudsen, E. I. (1998) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.18-10-03929.1998 · Cited by 176
Self-citationControl from below: the role of a midbrain network in spatial attention
Knudsen, E. I. (2011) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07696.x · Cited by 148
Self-citationOwl’s behavior and neural representation predicted by Bayesian inference
Fischer, B. J., & Peña, J. L. (2011) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.2872 · Cited by 139
Visually guided gradation of prey capture movements in larval zebrafish
Patterson, B. W., Abraham, A. O., MacIver, M. A., & McLean, D. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Biology · doi:10.1242/jeb.087742 · Cited by 122
Retinotectal mapping: new insights from molecular genetics
Lemke, G., & Reber, M. (2005) · Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.1146/annurev.cellbio.20.022403.093702 · Cited by 108
Dynamic representation of 3D auditory space in the midbrain of the free-flying echolocating bat
Kothari, N. B., Wohlgemuth, M. J., & Moss, C. F. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.29053 · Cited by 54
Directional Hearing in Owls: Neurobiology, Behaviour and Evolution
Volman, S. F. (1994) · Perception and Motor Control in Birds · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-75869-0_17 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Knudsen, E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1982-09-01
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1177-1194
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1963026571
- Cited by
- 512
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.