Noradrenergic Responsiveness Supports Selective Attention across the Adult Lifespan
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Selectively attending to relevant information while blocking out distractors is crucial for goal-directed behavior, yet with advancing age, deficits emerge in attentional selectivity. Decrements in attention have been associated with altered noradrenergic activity in animals. However, research linking noradrenergic functioning to attention in aging humans is scarce, likely reflecting long-standing methodological challenges in noninvasive assessments. We studied whether age-related differences in the noradrenergic system predict differences in attention. We measured pupil dilation, a noninvasive marker of arousal-related norepinephrine (NE) release, while concurrently recording the EEG of male younger ( N = 39; 25.2 ± 3.2 years) and older adults ( N = 38; 70.6 ± 2.7 years). Arousal was modulated on a trial-by-trial basis using fear-conditioned (CS + ) stimuli. During conditioning, pupil and EEG markers related to heightened arousal were identified. Afterward, in a dichotic listening task, participants were cued to direct attention to either the left or right ear while highly similar syllable pairs were presented simultaneously to both ears. During the dichotic listening task, presentation of fear-conditioned stimuli reinstated the acquired arousal response, as reflected in pupil and EEG α-β band responses. Critically, pupil dilation to CS + was correlated with stronger EEG α-β desynchronization, suggesting a common dependence on NE release. On a behavioral level, stronger arousal reactions were associated with better attention. In particular, structural equation modeling revealed that the responsiveness of the NE system is associated with attention on a latent construct level, measured by several indicator tasks. Overall, our results suggest that the responsiveness of the NE system supports attention across the lifespan. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT In old age, the ability to selectively process relevant aspects of the environment fades. Animal research suggests that the neuromodulator norepinephrine helps to maintain selective attention. We tested younger and older adults across a variety of attention tasks. In addition, we used arousing stimuli to experimentally activate participants' noradrenergic system while recording pupillometry and EEG to infer its functional capacity. Older adults showed compromised attention and reduced noradrenergic responsiveness as indicated by interrelated pupil and EEG markers. Crucially, in both age groups, a more responsive noradrenergic system was strongly associated with attention. Our findings link animal and human studies on the neural underpinning of attention in aging and underscore the importance of the noradrenergic system in late-life cognition.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
NE is involved in regulating attention, in particular those related to emotional and neutral emotions, and this signalling network has been found altered in different brain areas in patients with ADHD.
“NE is also involved in regulating attention [86], in particular those related to emotional and neutral emotions [87], and this signalling network has been found altered in different brain areas in patients with ADHD [88].”
From Molecular Characterisation of the Mechanism of Action of Stimulant Drugs Lisdexamfetamine and Methylphenidate on ADHD Neurobiology: A Review (2022) · cites this paper as [86]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Kok, J. S., Berg, I. J., & Scherder, E. J. A. (2013) · Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders Extra · doi:10.1159/000353441 · Cited by 20,589 · see citing works
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 · Cited by 8,496 · see citing works
The Neuropsychopharmacology of Fronto-Executive Function: Monoaminergic Modulation
Robbins, T. W., & Arnsten, A. F. T. (2009) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.051508.135535 · Cited by 957 · see citing works
Neurobiology of Executive Functions: Catecholamine Influences on Prefrontal Cortical Functions
Arnsten, A. F. T., & Li, B.-M. (2005) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.biopsych.2004.08.019 · Cited by 948 · see citing works
Pupil fluctuations track rapid changes in adrenergic and cholinergic activity in cortex
Reimer, J., McGinley, M. J., Liu, Y., Rodenkirch, C., Wang, Q., McCormick, D. A., & Tolias, A. S. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms13289 · Cited by 926 · see citing works
Cortical membrane potential signature of optimal states for sensory signal detection
McGinley, M. J., David, S. V., & McCormick, D. A. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.038 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Pupil fluctuations track fast switching of cortical states during quiet wakefulness
Reimer, J., Froudarakis, E., Cadwell, C. R., Yatsenko, D., Denfield, G. H., & Tolias, A. S. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.09.033 · Cited by 717 · see citing works
Arnsten, A. F. T., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1985) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.2999977 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Thiele, A., & Bellgrove, M. A. (2018) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.01.008 · Cited by 350 · see citing works
Benarroch, E. E. (2009) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.0b013e3181c2937c · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Memory load and the cognitive pupillary response in aging
Van Gerven, P. W. M., Paas, F., Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Schmidt, H. G. (2004) · Psychophysiology · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2003.00148.x · Cited by 292 · see citing works
McCormick, D. A., Pape, H.-C., & Williamson, A. (1991) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(08)63817-0 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Noradrenaline Modulates Visual Perception and Late Visually Evoked Activity
Gelbard-Sagiv, H., Magidov, E., Sharon, H., Hendler, T., & Nir, Y. (2018) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.05.051 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Brown TA (2006) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Press.
- Deitcher Y, Leibner Y, Kutzkel S, Zylbermann N, London M (2019) Nonlinear relationship between multimodal adrenergic responses and local dendritic activity in primary sensory cortices. bioRxiv:814657.
- Dimigen O, Sommer W, Hohlfeld A, Jacobs AM, Kliegl R (2011) Coregistration of eye movements and EEG in natural reading: Analyses and review. J Exp Psychol Gen 140:552-572.
- Herrmann CS, Grigutsch M, Busch NA (2005) EEG oscillations and wavelet analysis. In: Event-related potentials: A methods handbook (Handy TC, ed), pp 229-259. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Quintero, J., Gutiérrez-Casares, J. R., & Álamo, C. (2022) · Neurology and Therapy · doi:10.1007/s40120-022-00392-2 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dahl, M. J., Mather, M., Sander, M. C., & Werkle-Bergner, M.
- Affiliations
- Max Planck Institute for Human Development (DE)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Corresponding author
- Dahl, Martin J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2020-04-21
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 4372-4390
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC7252473
- OpenAlex
- W3016492427
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 13
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 6.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (WE 4269/5–1)
- Jacobs Foundation
- Max-Planck-Gesellschaft
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG025340)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Keywords
- norepinephrine, noradrenergic system, selective attention, aging, pupil dilation, pupillometry, arousal, fear conditioning, dichotic listening, older adults, late-life cognition, neuromodulation
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Aging, Attention, Cortical Synchronization, Humans, Male, Norepinephrine, Reflex, Pupillary, Brain Waves
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review