The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Severe tactual as well as visual memory deficits follow combined removal of the amygdala and hippocampus in monkeys
Open accessAbstract
To determine whether medial temporal limbic structures are essential for memory in more than one modality, we trained monkeys preoperatively on both visual and tactual versions of a sensory memory task and then retested them after they had been given bilateral ablations of either the amygdaloid complex, the hippocampal formation, or both. Monkeys with the combined ablations were severely impaired in both modalities. By contrast, the amygdalectomized monkeys were only moderately impaired in the two modalities, while the hippocampectomized monkeys were impaired in neither. Further examination revealed that the source of the impairment in the monkeys with amygdalectomy alone, unlike that in the animals with combined lesions, was the small size of the pool from which the test objects were drawn. The latter result suggests that, whereas the sensory memory impairment following the combined lesions is basically a recognition loss, the more selective impairment following amygdalectomy alone reflects special difficulty in determining whether a recognized object was presented recently. By demonstrating that the profound sensory memory impairment that follows combined ablation of the amygdala and hippocampus extends beyond a single modality, the present results strengthen the proposals that these two structures are important for sensory memory in all modalities and the multimodal or global amnesia observed in patients with medial temporal lobe damage is likewise due to combined amygdaloid and hippocampal lesions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
THE NEUROANATOMY OF AMNESIA: A CRITIQUE OF THE HIPPOCAMPAL MEMORY HYPOTHESIS
HOREL, J. A. (1978) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/101.3.403 · Cited by 493
Hippocampo-Hypothalamic Connections: Origin in Subicular Cortex, Not Ammon's Horn
Swanson, L. W., & Cowan, W. M. (1975) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.49928 · Cited by 305
Cited by
The Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System
Squire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1896849 · Cited by 3,282
Squire, L. R., Stark, C. E. L., & Clark, R. E. (2004) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.27.070203.144130 · Cited by 2,680
Squire, L. R. (1986) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3086978 · Cited by 1,278
Baxter, M. G., & Murray, E. A. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn875 · Cited by 1,200
Self-citationThe ageing cortical synapse: hallmarks and implications for cognitive decline
Morrison, J. H., & Baxter, M. G. (2012) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3200 · Cited by 965
Metadata
- Authors
- Murray, E., & Mishkin, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1984-10-01
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 2565-2580
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1524678942
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Severe tactual as well as visual memory deficits follow combined removal of the amygdala and hippocampus in monkeys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.04-10-02565.1984
- The paper
- Murray, E., & Mishkin, M. (1984). Severe tactual as well as visual memory deficits follow combined removal of the amygdala and hippocampus in monkeys. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.04-10-02565.1984
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.