Cited by 1,200Memory and Neural MechanismsNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior

The amygdala and reward

Baxter, Mark G., Murray, Elisabeth A.·2002·Nature Reviews Neuroscience

Abstract

The amygdala -- an almond-shaped group of nuclei at the heart of the telencephalon -- has been associated with a range of cognitive functions, including emotion, learning, memory, attention and perception. Most current views of amygdala function emphasize its role in negative emotions, such as fear, and in linking negative emotions with other aspects of cognition, such as learning and memory. However, recent evidence supports a role for the amygdala in processing positive emotions as well as negative ones, including learning about the beneficial biological value of stimuli. Indeed, the amygdala's role in stimulus-reward learning might be just as important as its role in processing negative affect and fear conditioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrn875

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amygdala and striatum have well-documented anatomic connectivity and show tight functional coupling in stimulus-reward association and stimulus-cue devaluation.

    “Amygdala and striatum have a well-documented anatomic connectivity (29) and show a tight functional coupling in stimulus–reward association and stimulus–cue devaluation (30).”

    From Amygdala damage eliminates monetary loss aversion (2010) · cites this paper as [30]

  • Both the amygdala and hippocampus are known to mediate attentional and learning aspects of emotion.

    “Both the amygdala and hippocampus are known to mediate attentional and learning aspects of emotion (Baxter and Murray, 2002, Calder et al., 2001; Phelps, 2004; Phelps and LeDoux, 2005).”

    From Adolescent neurobiological susceptibility to social context (2016) · cites this paper as Baxter and Murray, 2002

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baxter, M. G., & Murray, E. A.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Nature Reviews Neuroscience
Published
2002-07-01
Volume
3
Issue
7
Pages
563-573
ISSN
  • 1471-003X (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-0048
OpenAlex
W2085971650
Cited by
1,200
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 80 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 58
FWCI
3.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature reviews. Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
Keywords
amygdala, reward, positive emotions, fear conditioning, emotional learning, memory, emotion and cognition
MeSH terms
Amygdala, Animals, Haplorhini, Association, Behavior, Animal, Choice Behavior, Discrimination Learning, Photic Stimulation, Reward, Smell, Prefrontal Cortex, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review