The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corticostriatal and Thalamostriatal Synapses Have Distinctive Properties
Open accessAbstract
The two principal excitatory glutamatergic inputs to striatal medium spiny neurons (MSNs) arise from neurons in the cerebral cortex and thalamus. Although there have been many electrophysiological studies of MSN glutamatergic synapses, little is known about how corticostriatal and thalamostriatal synapses differ. Using mouse brain slices that allowed each type of synapse to be selectively activated, electrophysiological approaches were used to characterize their properties in identified striatopallidal and striatonigral MSNs. At corticostriatal synapses, a single afferent volley increased the glutamate released by a subsequent volley, leading to enhanced postsynaptic depolarization with repetitive stimulation. This was true for both striatonigral and striatopallidal MSNs. In contrast, at thalamostriatal synapses, a single afferent volley decreased glutamate released by a subsequent volley, leading to a depressed postsynaptic depolarization with repetitive stimulation. Again, this response pattern was the same in striatonigral and striatopallidal MSNs. These differences in release probability and short-term synaptic plasticity suggest that corticostriatal and thalamostriatal projection systems code information in temporally distinct ways, constraining how they regulate striatal circuitry.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Malenka, R. C., & Bear, M. F. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.09.012 · Cited by 3,968
Day, M., Wang, Z., Ding, J., An, X., Ingham, C. A., Shering, A. F., Wokosin, D., Ilijic, E., Sun, Z., Sampson, A. R., et al. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1632 · Cited by 745 · cited 8×
“which D1 or D2 receptor-expressing MSNs were labeled with GFP (Heintz, 2001; Day et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationEndocannabinoid-mediated rescue of striatal LTD and motor deficits in Parkinson's disease models
Kreitzer, A. C., & Malenka, R. C. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05506 · Cited by 735
Differential regulation of neocortical synapses by neuromodulators and activity
Gil, Z., Connors, B. W., & Amitai, Y. (1997) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80380-3 · Cited by 553
Cited by
Surmeier, D. J., Ding, J., Day, M., Wang, Z., & Shen, W. (2007) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2007.03.008 · Cited by 1,203
Self-citationHaber, S. N. (2016) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2016.18.1/shaber · Cited by 922
A comprehensive excitatory input map of the striatum reveals novel functional organization
Hunnicutt, B. J., Jongbloets, B. C., Birdsong, W. T., Gertz, K. J., Zhong, H., & Mao, T. (2016) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.19103 · Cited by 536
Neuroligin-1 Deletion Results in Impaired Spatial Memory and Increased Repetitive Behavior
Blundell, J., Blaiss, C. A., Etherton, M. R., Espinosa, F., Tabuchi, K., Walz, C., Bolliger, M. F., Südhof, T. C., & Powell, C. M. (2010) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.4517-09.2010 · Cited by 450
What, If, and When to Move: Basal Ganglia Circuits and Self-Paced Action Initiation
Klaus, A., Alves da Silva, J., & Costa, R. M. (2019) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-072116-031033 · Cited by 284
Metadata
- Authors
- Ding, J., Peterson, J. D., & Surmeier, D. J.
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2008-06-18
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 6483-6492
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2011154084
- Cited by
- 291
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.