Global transcriptome analysis of genetically identified neurons in the adult cortex
Abstract
The enormous cellular complexity of the brain is a major obstacle for gene expression profiling of neurological disease models, because physiologically relevant changes of transcription in a specific neuronal subset are likely to be lost in the presence of other neurons and glia. We solved this problem in transgenic mice by labeling genetically defined cells with a nuclear variant of GFP. When combined with laser-directed microdissection, intact RNA from unfixed, freeze-dried sections can be isolated, which is a prerequisite for high-quality global transcriptome analysis. Here, we compared gene expression profiles between pyramidal motor neurons and pyramidal somatosensory neurons captured from layer V of the adult neocortex. One striking feature of motor neurons is the elevated expression of ribosomal genes and genes involved in ATP synthesis. This suggests a molecular adaptation of the upper motor neurons to longer axonal projections and higher electrical activity. These molecular signatures were not detected when cortical layers and microareas were analyzed in toto. Additionally, we used microarrays to determine the global mRNA expression profiles of microdissected Purkinje cells and cellularly complex cerebellar cortex microregions. In summary, our analysis shows that cellularly complex targets lead to averaged gene expression profiles that lack substantial amounts of cell type-specific information. Thus, cell type-restricted sampling strategies are mandatory in the CNS. The combined use of a genetic label with laser-microdissection offers an unbiased approach to map patterns of gene expression onto practically any cell type of the brain.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Until recently, cell type based expression profiling in the brain mainly relied on physical enrichment of target cell populations such as laser capture microdissection, fluorescence-activated cell sorting, or manual sorting.
“Until recently, cell type based expression profiling in the brain has mainly relied on physical enrichment of target cell population such as laser capture microdissection (Meguro et al., 2004, Rossner et al., 2006), fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Tomomura et al., 2001, Lobo et al., 2006), or manual sorting (Sugino et al., 2006).”
From Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain (2012) · cites this paper as Rossner et al., 2006
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Pellerin, L., & Magistretti, P. J. (1994) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.91.22.10625 · Cited by 2,927 · cited 4× · see citing works
“These in vivo observations support the existence of an astrocyte-neuron “lactate shuttle” that has recently been postulated based on cell culture data (Pellerin and Magistretti, 1994, 2004).”
BackgroundInfluentialA gene expression atlas of the central nervous system based on bacterial artificial chromosomes
Gong, S., Zheng, C., Doughty, M. L., Losos, K., Didkovsky, N., Schambra, U. B., Nowak, N. J., Joyner, A., Leblanc, G., Hatten, M. E., et al. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02033 · Cited by 2,108 · see citing works
Extensive and divergent effects of sleep and wakefulness on brain gene expression
Cirelli, C., Gutierrez, C. M., & Tononi, G. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00814-6 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Molecular taxonomy of major neuronal classes in the adult mouse forebrain
Sugino, K., Hempel, C. M., Miller, M. N., Hattox, A. M., Shapiro, P., Wu, C., Huang, Z. J., & Nelson, S. B. (2006) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn1618 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Single-Cell Transcriptional Analysis of Neuronal Progenitors
Tietjen, I., Rihel, J. M., Cao, Y., Koentges, G., Zakhary, L., & Dulac, C. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00229-0 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Zhang, Y., Chen, K., Sloan, S. A., Bennett, M. L., Scholze, A. R., O'Keeffe, S., Phatnani, H. P., Guarnieri, P., Caneda, C., Ruderisch, N., et al. (2014) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1860-14.2014 · Cited by 4,875 · see citing works
“Previous groups have performed transcriptome studies of one or more purified cell types in the brain (Dugas et al., 2006; Rossner et al., 2006; Lovatt et al., 2007; Cahoy et al., 2008; Doyle et al., 2008; Lau et al., 2008; Daneman et al., 2010; Wylie et al., 2010; Bracko et al., 2012; Friedrich et…”
BackgroundMethodMeasurement of Immediate‐Early Gene Activation‐ <i>c‐fos</i> and Beyond
Kovács, K. J. (2008) · Journal of Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2826.2008.01734.x · Cited by 493 · see citing works
Cell-Type-Based Analysis of MicroRNA Profiles in the Mouse Brain
He, M., Liu, Y., Wang, X., Zhang, M. Q., Hannon, G. J., & Huang, Z. J. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2011.11.010 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Molecular neuroanatomy: a generation of progress
Pollock, J. D., Wu, D.-Y., & Satterlee, J. S. (2014) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2013.11.001 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Shifting the paradigm: new approaches for characterizing and classifying neurons
Bernard, A., Sorensen, S. A., & Lein, E. S. (2009) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2009.09.010 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Hemonnot-Girard, A.-L., Meersseman, C., Pastore, M., Garcia, V., Linck, N., Rey, C., Chebbi, A., Jeanneteau, F., Ginsberg, S. D., Lachuer, J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Neuroinflammation · doi:10.1186/s12974-022-02581-0 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
MicroRNA-92a–CPEB3 axis protects neurons against inflammatory neurodegeneration
Winkler, I., Engler, J. B., Vieira, V., Bauer, S., Liu, Y.-H., Di Liberto, G., Grochowska, K. M., Wagner, I., Bier, J., Bal, L. C., et al. (2023) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adi6855 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rossner, M. J., Hirrlinger, J., Wichert, S. P., Boehm, C., Newrzella, D., Hiemisch, H., Eisenhardt, G., Stuenkel, C., von Ahsen, O., & Nave, K.-A.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2006-09-27
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 39
- Pages
- 9956-9966
- ISSN
- 0270-6474
- 1529-2401
- Cited by
- 80
- References
- 5
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review