Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 31 of the 31 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lesions in nucleus basalis magnocellularis and medial septal area of rats produce qualitatively similar memory impairments

Open access
Hepler, DJ, Olton, DS, Wenk, GL, Coyle, JT·1985·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The functional contribution of nucleus basalis magnocellularis (NBM) and the medial septal area (MSA) to memory was evaluated in two different spatial discriminations. Preoperatively, rats were trained to a criterion level of performance in a simultaneous left/right discrimination on the stem of a T-maze (a trial-independent memory) and a discrete-trial, rewarded alternation discrimination on the arms of the T-maze (a trial-dependent memory). Bilateral lesions were made by injecting ibotenic acid (IBO) into the NBM, MSA, both NBM and MSA, or dorsal globus pallidus (DGP), and by radiofrequency current (RF) in the NBM and MSA. Control rats received operations in which either no current was passed or no neurotoxin was injected. Lesions in the NBM, MSA, or both the NBM and MSA produced a similar pattern of behavioral changes relative to the performance of controls; postoperative reacquisition of the arm discrimination was initially impaired but showed recovery to normal levels, whereas postoperative reacquisition and reversal of the stem discrimination was not impaired (except following the combined NBM and MSA lesion). Lesions of the DGP had no effect on choice accuracy in any discrimination. When the discrimination on the arms was made more difficult by increasing the delay interval during which the information had to be remembered, rats with combined NBM and MSA lesions were again impaired relative to controls and showed no signs of recovery of function. These results provide information about the behavioral functions of the basal forebrain cholinergic system and suggest that pathological changes in certain components of this system can cause disorders of memory.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.05-04-00866.1985

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 31 references

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Hepler, D., Olton, D., Wenk, G., & Coyle, J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1985-04-01
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
866-873
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1765689631
Cited by
381
References
31
FWCI
21.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lesions in nucleus basalis magnocellularis and medial septal area of rats produce qualitatively similar memory impairments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.05-04-00866.1985
The paper
Hepler, D., Olton, D., Wenk, G., & Coyle, J. (1985). Lesions in nucleus basalis magnocellularis and medial septal area of rats produce qualitatively similar memory impairments. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.05-04-00866.1985

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.