PreprintCited by 39Memory and Neural MechanismsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchCognitive Abilities and Testing

Extensive Lesions of Cholinergic Basal Forebrain Neurons Do Not Impair Spatial Working Memory

Open access
Vuckovich, Joseph A., Semel, Mara E., Baxter, Mark G.·2004·Learning & Memory

Abstract

A recent studysuggests that lesions to all major areas of the cholinergic basal forebrain in the rat (medial septum, horizontal limb of the diagonal band of Broca, and nucleus basalis magnocellularis) impair a spatial working memory task. However, this experiment used a surgical technique that mayhave damaged cerebellar Purkinje cells. The present studytested rats with highlyselective lesions of cholinergic neurons in all major areas of the basal forebrain on a spatial working memorytask in the radial arm maze. In postoperative testing, there were no significant differences between lesion and control groups in working memory, even with a delayperiod of 8 h, with the exception of a transient impairment during the first 2 d of postoperative testing at shorter delays (0 or 2 h). This finding corroborates other results that indicate that the cholinergic basal forebrain does not playa significant role in spatial working memory. Furthermore, it underscores the presence of intact memoryfunctions after cholinergic basal forebrain damage, despite attentional impairments that follow these lesions, demonstrated in other task paradigms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/lm.63504

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Removal of forebrain cholinergic neurons does not have strong effects on the performance of animals in tasks that do not explicitly tax attentional processes.

    “The robustness and the selectivity of the cognitive impairments produced by such lesions is further supported, albeit indirectly, by a substantial number of experiments which concluded that removal of forebrain cholinergic neurons does not have strong effects on the performance of animals in tasks that do not explicitly tax attentional processes (Vuckovich et al, 2004; Frick et al, 2004).”

    From Modes and models of forebrain cholinergic neuromodulation of cognition (2011) · cites this paper as Vuckovich et al, 2004

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Baxter, M.G. and Gallagher, M. 1997. Cognitive effects of selective loss of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons: Implications for cholinergic therapies of Alzheimer's disease. In Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease: Molecular and neurobiological foundations (eds. J.D. Brioni and M.W. Decker), pp. 87-103. Wiley, New York.
  2. Baxter, M.G. and Murg, S.L. 2002. The basal forebrain cholinergic system and memory: Beware of dogma. In Neuropsychology of memory, 3rd ed. (eds. L.R. Squire and D.L. Schacter), pp. 425-436. Guilford Press, New York.
  3. Sarter, M., Bruno, J.P., and Himmelheber, A.M. 1997. Cortical acetylcholine and attention: Neuropharmacological and cognitive principles directing treatment strategies for cognitive disorders. In Pharmacological treatment of Alzheimer's disease: Molecular and neurobiological foundations (eds. J.D. Brioni and M.W. Decker), pp. 105-128. Wiley, New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vuckovich, J. A., Semel, M. E., & Baxter, M. G.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Baxter, Mark G.
Venue
Learning & Memory
Published
2004-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
87-94
ISSN
  • 1072-0502 (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-5485
OpenAlex
W2162431663
Cited by
39
References
44
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 4
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning & Memory (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
basal forebrain cholinergic system, spatial working memory, medial septum, diagonal band of Broca, nucleus basalis magnocellularis, radial maze, attentional impairment
MeSH terms
Acetylcholine, Animals, Cholinergic Fibers, Male, Memory, Short-Term, Neurons, Space Perception, Prosencephalon, Rats, Long-Evans, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review