Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 277

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Functional reorganization in somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 of adult monkeys after median nerve repair: possible relationships to sensory recovery in humans

Open access
Wall, JT, Kaas, JH, Sur, M, Nelson, RJ, Felleman, DJ, Merzenich, MM·1986·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that the primary somatosensory cortex of adult mammals undergoes somatotopic reorganization in response to peripheral nerve transection. The present study assesses how cortical organization is affected when a transected nerve subsequently regenerates. The median nerve to one hand of adult owl monkeys was transected and repaired. Following nerve regeneration, the representations of the hand in cortical areas 3b and 1 were studied with neurophysiological mapping methods. The major results were as follows: Peripherally, median nerve transection, repair, and regeneration resulted in reinnervation of the median nerve skin territory. Centrally, both the initial loss and subsequent regeneration of median nerve inputs caused reorganizational changes in cortex. Reorganizational changes were specifically restricted to regions of the hand cortex where inputs from the median nerve were normally represented. The functional features of cortical regions that recovered tactile responsiveness from reinnervated skin regions were abnormal in several respects. Most notably, these regions contained recording sites with abnormally located or multiple cutaneous receptive fields, and contained major topographical changes, such as reestablishment of palmar pad or digit representations in small, discontinuous patches of cortex. Normal organizational features were reestablished to a more limited extent. These features included recovery of delimited, discrete receptive fields and reestablishment of topographic representations for localized skin areas. Different transformations in topographical organization were seen in areas 3b and 1 of the same monkey. These results suggest that nerve regeneration reestablishes the cortical capacity to process tactile information from reinnervated skin via a prolonged reorganizational process that appears dependent on peripheral and central factors. Cortical recovery mechanisms clearly appear to have limitations, since preinjury patterns of cortical organization are not widely recovered even almost 1 year after repair. We suggest possible relationships between cortical reorganizational changes in these primates, and postrepair sensory changes in humans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.06-01-00218.1986

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 277

Metadata

Authors
Wall, J., Kaas, J., Sur, M., Nelson, R., Felleman, D., & Merzenich, M.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1986-01-01
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
218-233
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1854283880
Cited by
277
References
28
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional reorganization in somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 of adult monkeys after median nerve repair: possible relationships to sensory recovery in humans. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.06-01-00218.1986
The paper
Wall, J., Kaas, J., Sur, M., Nelson, R., Felleman, D., & Merzenich, M. (1986). Functional reorganization in somatosensory cortical areas 3b and 1 of adult monkeys after median nerve repair: possible relationships to sensory recovery in humans. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.06-01-00218.1986

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.