The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Resting-State Functional Connectivity Emerges from Structurally and Dynamically Shaped Slow Linear Fluctuations
Open accessAbstract
Brain fluctuations at rest are not random but are structured in spatial patterns of correlated activity across different brain areas. The question of how resting-state functional connectivity (FC) emerges from the brain's anatomical connections has motivated several experimental and computational studies to understand structure-function relationships. However, the mechanistic origin of resting state is obscured by large-scale models' complexity, and a close structure-function relation is still an open problem. Thus, a realistic but simple enough description of relevant brain dynamics is needed. Here, we derived a dynamic mean field model that consistently summarizes the realistic dynamics of a detailed spiking and conductance-based synaptic large-scale network, in which connectivity is constrained by diffusion imaging data from human subjects. The dynamic mean field approximates the ensemble dynamics, whose temporal evolution is dominated by the longest time scale of the system. With this reduction, we demonstrated that FC emerges as structured linear fluctuations around a stable low firing activity state close to destabilization. Moreover, the model can be further and crucially simplified into a set of motion equations for statistical moments, providing a direct analytical link between anatomical structure, neural network dynamics, and FC. Our study suggests that FC arises from noise propagation and dynamical slowing down of fluctuations in an anatomically constrained dynamical system. Altogether, the reduction from spiking models to statistical moments presented here provides a new framework to explicitly understand the building up of FC through neuronal dynamics underpinned by anatomical connections and to drive hypotheses in task-evoked studies and for clinical applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Present BNMs only allow for a very limited number of parameters to be estimated, e.g., a single global scaling factor of connection strength (Deco et al., 2013).”
From Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression (2016) · cites this paper as Deco et al., 2013
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190
Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems
Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2575 · Cited by 11,820
Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri
Biswal, B., Zerrin Yetkin, F., Haughton, V. M., & Hyde, J. S. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910340409 · Cited by 9,812
The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., & Raichle, M. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0504136102 · Cited by 8,553
Self-citationSpontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging
Fox, M. D., & Raichle, M. E. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2201 · Cited by 6,700
Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis
Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., & Menon, V. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0135058100 · Cited by 6,358
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., & Penny, W. (2003) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/s1053-8119(03)00202-7 · Cited by 4,583
Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex
Hagmann, P., Cammoun, L., Gigandet, X., Meuli, R., Honey, C. J., Wedeen, V. J., & Sporns, O. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060159 · Cited by 4,173
Self-citationFunctional and Effective Connectivity: A Review
Friston, K. J. (2011) · Brain Connectivity · doi:10.1089/brain.2011.0008 · Cited by 3,415
Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity
Honey, C. J., Sporns, O., Cammoun, L., Gigandet, X., Thiran, J. P., Meuli, R., & Hagmann, P. (2009) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0811168106 · Cited by 3,307
Self-citation
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI
Schaefer, A., Kong, R., Gordon, E. M., Laumann, T. O., Zuo, X.-N., Holmes, A. J., Eickhoff, S. B., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2018) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx179 · Cited by 3,657
Damaraju, E., Allen, E. A., Belger, A., Ford, J. M., McEwen, S. C., Mathalon, D. H., Mueller, B. A., Pearlson, G. D., Potkin, S. G., Preda, A., et al. (2014) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.003 · Cited by 1,088
Can sliding-window correlations reveal dynamic functional connectivity in resting-state fMRI?
Hindriks, R., Adhikari, M. H., Murayama, Y., Ganzetti, M., Mantini, D., Logothetis, N. K., & Deco, G. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.11.055 · Cited by 632
Self-citationZuo, X., & Xing, X.-X. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.05.009 · Cited by 678
Rethinking segregation and integration: contributions of whole-brain modelling
Deco, G., Tononi, G., Boly, M., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2015) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn3963 · Cited by 658
Self-citationA Large-Scale Circuit Mechanism for Hierarchical Dynamical Processing in the Primate Cortex
Chaudhuri, R., Knoblauch, K., Gariel, M.-A., Kennedy, H., & Wang, X. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.09.008 · Cited by 618
Reconceptualizing functional brain connectivity in autism from a developmental perspective
Uddin, L. Q., Supekar, K., & Menon, V. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00458 · Cited by 606
Resting-brain functional connectivity predicted by analytic measures of network communication
Goñi, J., van den Heuvel, M. P., Avena‐Koenigsberger, A., de Mendizábal, N. V., Betzel, R. F., Griffa, A., Hagmann, P., Corominas‐Murtra, B., Thiran, J., & Sporns, O. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1315529111 · Cited by 570
Self-citationThe dynamics of resting fluctuations in the brain: metastability and its dynamical cortical core
Deco, G., Kringelbach, M. L., Jirsa, V., & Ritter, P. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-03073-5 · Cited by 552
Self-citationColloquium : Criticality and dynamical scaling in living systems
Muñoz, M. A. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.031001 · Cited by 556
Functional connectivity dynamics: modeling the switching behavior of the resting state
Hansen, E. C. A., Battaglia, D., Spiegler, A., Deco, G., & Jirsa, V. K. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.001 · Cited by 528
Self-citationBrain Networks in Schizophrenia
van den Heuvel, M. P., & Fornito, A. (2014) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-014-9248-7 · Cited by 531
Activity flow over resting-state networks shapes cognitive task activations
Cole, M. W., Ito, T., Bassett, D. S., & Schultz, D. H. (2016) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4406 · Cited by 511
Allostatic Self-efficacy: A Metacognitive Theory of Dyshomeostasis-Induced Fatigue and Depression
Stephan, K. E., Manjaly, Z. M., Mathys, C. D., Weber, L. A. E., Paliwal, S., Gard, T., Tittgemeyer, M., Fleming, S. M., Haker, H., Seth, A. K., et al. (2016) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2016.00550 · Cited by 437
“Present BNMs only allow for a very limited number of parameters to be estimated, e.g., a single global scaling factor of Frontiers in Human Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.org 19 November 2016 | Volume 10 | Article 550 connection strength (Deco et al., 2013).”
BackgroundDeco, G., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2014) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.034 · Cited by 416
Self-citationHow Local Excitation-Inhibition Ratio Impacts the Whole Brain Dynamics
Deco, G., Ponce‐Alvarez, A., Hagmann, P., Romani, G. L., Mantini, D., & Corbetta, M. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.5068-13.2014 · Cited by 393
Self-citationAltered global brain signal in schizophrenia
Yang, G., Murray, J. D., Repovš, G., Cole, M. W., Savić, A., Glasser, M. F., Pittenger, C., Krystal, J. H., Wang, X., Pearlson, G. D., et al. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1405289111 · Cited by 372
Krienen, F. M., Yeo, B. T. T., & Buckner, R. L. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0526 · Cited by 372
Cabral, J., Kringelbach, M. L., & Deco, G. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.03.045 · Cited by 364
Self-citationHierarchical Heterogeneity across Human Cortex Shapes Large-Scale Neural Dynamics
Demirtaş, M., Burt, J. B., Helmer, M., Ji, J. L., Adkinson, B. D., Glasser, M. F., Essen, D. C. V., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Anticevic, A., & Murray, J. D. (2019) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2019.01.017 · Cited by 343
Mathematical framework for large-scale brain network modeling in The Virtual Brain
Sanz-Leon, P., Knock, S. A., Spiegler, A., & Jirsa, V. K. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.002 · Cited by 356
Exploring the network dynamics underlying brain activity during rest
Cabral, J., Kringelbach, M. L., & Deco, G. (2014) · Progress in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.pneurobio.2013.12.005 · Cited by 351
Self-citationCabral, J., Luckhoo, H., Woolrich, M. W., Joensson, M., Mohseni, H., Baker, A. P., Kringelbach, M. L., & Deco, G. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.047 · Cited by 320
Self-citationBrain network communication: concepts, models and applications
Seguin, C., Sporns, O., & Zalesky, A. (2023) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-023-00718-5 · Cited by 329
Dynamic coupling of whole-brain neuronal and neurotransmitter systems
Kringelbach, M. L., Cruzat, J., Cabral, J., Knudsen, G. M., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Whybrow, P. C., Logothetis, N. K., & Deco, G. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1921475117 · Cited by 284
Self-citationRoberts, J. A., Gollo, L. L., Abeysuriya, R. G., Roberts, G., Mitchell, P. B., Woolrich, M. W., & Breakspear, M. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08999-0 · Cited by 264
Cheng, W., Rolls, E. T., Gu, H., Zhang, J., & Feng, J. (2015) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awv051 · Cited by 270
Wang, P., Kong, R., Kong, X., Liégeois, R., Orbán, C., Deco, G., van den Heuvel, M. P., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aat7854 · Cited by 231
Self-citationDeco, G., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2016) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2016.01.001 · Cited by 242
Self-citationResting-State Temporal Synchronization Networks Emerge from Connectivity Topology and Heterogeneity
Ponce‐Alvarez, A., Deco, G., Hagmann, P., Romani, G. L., Mantini, D., & Corbetta, M. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004100 · Cited by 244
Self-citationThe contribution of TMS–EEG coregistration in the exploration of the human cortical connectome
Bortoletto, M., Veniero, D., Thut, G., & Miniussi, C. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.014 · Cited by 235
Wang, J., Yang, Y., Fan, L., Xu, J., Li, C., Liu, Y., Fox, P. T., Eickhoff, S. B., Yu, C., & Jiang, T. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22626 · Cited by 233
Understanding Structural-Functional Relationships in the Human Brain
Wang, Z., Dai, Z., Gong, G., Zhou, C., & Yong He, A. (2014) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858414537560 · Cited by 232
Explosive phenomena in complex networks
D’Souza, R. M., Gómez‐Gardeñes, J., Nagler, J., & Arenas, A. (2019) · Advances In Physics · doi:10.1080/00018732.2019.1650450 · Cited by 206
Taghia, J., Cai, W., Ryali, S., Kochalka, J., Nicholas, J., Chen, T., & Menon, V. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04723-6 · Cited by 200
Inferring multi-scale neural mechanisms with brain network modelling
Schirner, M., McIntosh, A. R., Jirsa, V., Deco, G., & Ritter, P. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.28927 · Cited by 204
Self-citationInference in the age of big data: Future perspectives on neuroscience
Bzdok, D., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.061 · Cited by 195
Riedl, V., Kurcyus, K., Strobel, C., Tahmasian, M., Grimmer, T., Förster, S., Friston, K. J., Sorg, C., & Drzezga, A. E. (2014) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0492-14.2014 · Cited by 193
Translational perspectives for computational neuroimaging
Stephan, K. E., Iglesias, S., Heinzle, J., & Diaconescu, A. O. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.07.008 · Cited by 169
Anticevic, A., Hu, X., Xiao, Y., Hu, J., Li, F., Bi, F., Cole, M. W., Savic, A., Yang, G. J., Repovs, G., et al. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2310-14.2015 · Cited by 178
Gilson, M., Moreno‐Bote, R., Ponce‐Alvarez, A., Ritter, P., & Deco, G. (2016) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004762 · Cited by 163
Self-citationFrässle, S., Lomakina, E. I., Razi, A., Friston, K. J., Buhmann, J. M., & Stephan, K. E. (2017) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.02.090 · Cited by 163
Dynamical consequences of regional heterogeneity in the brain’s transcriptional landscape
Deco, G., Aquino, K. M., Arnatkevičiūtė, A., Oldham, S., Sabaroedin, K., Rogasch, N. C., Kringelbach, M. L., & Fornito, A. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf4752 · Cited by 170
Self-citationComputational neuroimaging strategies for single patient predictions
Stephan, K. E., Schlagenhauf, F., Huys, Q. J. M., Raman, S., Aponte, E. A., Brodersen, K. H., Rigoux, L., Moran, R., Jean Daunizeau, A., Dolan, R. J., et al. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.038 · Cited by 174
The secret life of predictive brains: what’s spontaneous activity for?
Pezzulo, G., Zorzi, M., & Corbetta, M. (2021) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2021.05.007 · Cited by 173
Self-citationThe Rediscovery of Slowness: Exploring the Timing of Cognition
Kringelbach, M. L., McIntosh, A. R., Ritter, P., Jirsa, V., & Deco, G. (2015) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.07.011 · Cited by 159
Self-citationThe relation between structural and functional connectivity patterns in complex brain networks
Stam, C. J., van Straaten, E. C. W., van Dellen, E., Tewarie, P. K. B., Gong, G., Hillebrand, A., Meier, J. M., & Mieghem, P. V. (2015) · International Journal of Psychophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.02.011 · Cited by 154
Complex network theory and the brain
Papo, D., Buldú, J. M., Boccaletti, S., & Bullmore, E. T. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0520 · Cited by 156
Functional hierarchy underlies preferential connectivity disturbances in schizophrenia
Yang, G. J., Murray, J. D., Wang, X.-J., Glahn, D. C., Pearlson, G. D., Repovs, G., Krystal, J. H., & Anticevic, A. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1508436113 · Cited by 153
Pagani, M., Barsotti, N., Bertero, A., Trakoshis, S., Ulysse, L., Locarno, A., Misevičiūtė, I., Felice, A. D., Canella, C., Supekar, K., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26131-z · Cited by 156
Self-citationPerry, A., Roberts, G. M. P., Mitchell, P. B., & Breakspear, M. J. (2018) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-018-0267-2 · Cited by 152
Schmidt, M., Bakker, R., Shen, K., Bezgin, G., Diesmann, M., & van Albada, S. J. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006359 · Cited by 157
Disruption of structure–function coupling in the schizophrenia connectome
Cocchi, L., Harding, I. H., Lord, A., Pantelis, C., Yücel, M., & Zalesky, A. (2014) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2014.05.004 · Cited by 138
Functional brain connectivity is predictable from anatomic network's Laplacian eigen-structure
Abdelnour, F., Dayan, M., Devinsky, O., Thesen, T., & Raj, A. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.016 · Cited by 137
What We Know About the Brain Structure–Function Relationship
García-Ramó, K. B., & Fernández, C. I. (2018) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs8040039 · Cited by 152
Chen, B., Xu, T., Zhou, C., Wang, L., Yang, N., Wang, Z., Dong, H.-M., Yang, Z., Zang, Y., Zuo, X., et al. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0144963 · Cited by 136
Structure-function coupling in the human connectome: A machine learning approach
Sarwar, T., Tian, Y., Yeo, B. T. T., Ramamohanarao, K., & Zalesky, A. (2020) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117609 · Cited by 143
Symmetry Breaking in Space-Time Hierarchies Shapes Brain Dynamics and Behavior
Pillai, A. S., & Jirsa, V. (2017) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.05.013 · Cited by 132
Vohryzek, J., Deco, G., Cessac, B., Kringelbach, M. L., & Cabral, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2020.00020 · Cited by 117
Self-citationResting state functional connectivity in the human spinal cord
Barry, R. L., Smith, S. A., Dula, A. N., & Gore, J. C. (2014) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.02812 · Cited by 119
Tewarie, P. K. B., Hillebrand, A., van Dijk, B. W., Stam, C. J., O’Neill, G. C., Mieghem, P. V., Meier, J. M., Woolrich, M. W., Morris, P. G., & Brookes, M. J. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.07.057 · Cited by 123
Distributed harmonic patterns of structure-function dependence orchestrate human consciousness
Luppi, A. I., Vohryzek, J., Kringelbach, M. L., Mediano, P. A. M., Craig, M. M., Adapa, R., Carhart-Harris, R. L., Roseman, L., Pappas, I., Peattie, A. R. D., et al. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04474-1 · Cited by 114
van Hartevelt, T. J., Cabral, J., Deco, G., Møller, A., Green, A. L., Aziz, T. Z., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086496 · Cited by 114
Self-citationTewarie, P. K. B., Hillebrand, A., van Dellen, E., Schoonheim, M. M., Barkhof, F., Polman, C. H., Beaulieu, C., Gong, G., van Dijk, B. W., & Stam, C. J. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.038 · Cited by 115
A generative model of whole-brain effective connectivity
Frässle, S., Lomakina, E. I., Kasper, L., Manjaly, Z. M., Leff, A. P., Pruessmann, K. P., Buhmann, J. M., & Stephan, K. E. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.05.058 · Cited by 104
Controversies and progress on standardization of large-scale brain network nomenclature
Uddin, L. Q., Betzel, R. F., Cohen, J. R., Damoiseaux, J. S., Brigard, F. D., Eickhoff, S. B., Fornito, A., Gratton, C., Gordon, E. M., Laird, A. R., et al. (2023) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00323 · Cited by 125
Diversity of meso-scale architecture in human and non-human connectomes
Betzel, R. F., Medaglia, J. D., & Bassett, D. S. (2018) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 122
Sensory-motor cortices shape functional connectivity dynamics in the human brain
Kong, X., Kong, R., Orbán, C., Wang, P., Zhang, S., Anderson, K. M., Holmes, A. J., Murray, J. D., Deco, G., van den Heuvel, M. P., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26704-y · Cited by 115
Self-citationHarlalka, V., Bapi, R. S., Vinod, P. K., & Roy, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00006 · Cited by 110
Park, B., Hong, S., Valk, S. L., Paquola, C., Benkarim, O. M., Bethlehem, R. A. I., Martino, A. D., Milham, M. P., Gozzi, A., Yeo, B. T. T., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21732-0 · Cited by 107
Adhikari, M. H., Hacker, C. D., Siegel, J. S., Griffa, A., Hagmann, P., Deco, G., & Corbetta, M. (2017) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awx021 · Cited by 103
Self-citationAbeysuriya, R., Hadida, J., Sotiropoulos, S. N., Jbabdi, S., Becker, R., Hunt, B. A. E., Brookes, M. J., & Woolrich, M. W. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006007 · Cited by 96
Spectral mapping of brain functional connectivity from diffusion imaging
Becker, C. O., Pequito, S., Pappas, G. J., Miller, M. B., Grafton, S. T., Bassett, D. S., & Preciado, V. M. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-18769-x · Cited by 104
Task-evoked activity quenches neural correlations and variability across cortical areas
Ito, T., Brincat, S. L., Siegel, M., Mill, R. D., He, B. J., Miller, E. K., Rotstein, H. G., & Cole, M. W. (2020) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007983 · Cited by 103
Rare long-range cortical connections enhance human information processing
Deco, G., Perl, Y. S., Vuust, P., Tagliazucchi, E., Kennedy, H., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2021) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2021.07.064 · Cited by 95
Self-citationHuang, Z., Zhang, J., Jinsong, W., Qin, P., Wu, X., Wang, Z., 戴睿, Li, Y., 梁伟民, Mao, Y., et al. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.062 · Cited by 98
Functional brain networks: great expectations, hard times and the big leap forward
Papo, D., Zanin, M., Pineda‐Pardo, J. A., Boccaletti, S., & Buldú, J. M. (2014) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2013.0525 · Cited by 87
Toward a standardized structural–functional group connectome in MNI space
Horn, A., & Blankenburg, F. (2015) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.08.048 · Cited by 94
Ponce‐Alvarez, A., He, B. J., Hagmann, P., & Deco, G. (2015) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004445 · Cited by 86
Self-citationNaik, S., Banerjee, A., Bapi, R. S., Deco, G., & Roy, D. (2017) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.007 · Cited by 89
Self-citationIndividual structural features constrain the mouse functional connectome
Melozzi, F., Bergmann, E., Harris, J. A., Kahn, I., Jirsa, V., & Bernard, C. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1906694116 · Cited by 89
The promise of a model-based psychiatry: building computational models of mental ill health
Hauser, T. U., Skvortsova, V., Choudhury, M. D., & Koutsouleris, N. (2022) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(22)00152-2 · Cited by 97
Jeganathan, J., Perry, A., Bassett, D. S., Roberts, G. M. P., Mitchell, P. B., & Breakspear, M. J. (2018) · NeuroImage Clinical · doi:10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.032 · Cited by 87
Larsen, B., Sydnor, V. J., Keller, A. S., Yeo, B. T. T., & Satterthwaite, T. D. (2023) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/j.tins.2023.07.007 · Cited by 93
Optimal control based seizure abatement using patient derived connectivity
Taylor, P. N., Thomas, J., Sinha, N., Dauwels, J., Kaiser, M., Thesen, T., & Ruths, J. (2015) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00202 · Cited by 88
Jann, K., Hernandez, L. M., Beck‐Pancer, D., McCarron, R., Smith, R. X., Dapretto, M., & Wang, D. J. J. (2015) · Brain and Behavior · doi:10.1002/brb3.358 · Cited by 89
Modeling Brain Dynamics in Brain Tumor Patients Using the Virtual Brain
Aerts, H., Schirner, M., Jeurissen, B., Roost, D. V., Achten, E., Ritter, P., & Marinazzo, D. (2018) · eNeuro · doi:10.1523/eneuro.0083-18.2018 · Cited by 86
Disruption of structural and functional networks in long-standing multiple sclerosis
Tewarie, P. K. B., Steenwijk, M. D., Tijms, B. M., Daams, M., Balk, L. J., Stam, C. J., Uitdehaag, B. M. J., Polman, C. H., Geurts, J. J. G., Barkhof, F., et al. (2014) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22596 · Cited by 86
Dynamical Mechanisms of Interictal Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Epilepsy
Courtiol, J., Guye, M., Bartoloméi, F., Petkoski, S., & Jirsa, V. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0905-19.2020 · Cited by 85
Clinical Concepts Emerging from fMRI Functional Connectomics
Matthews, P. M., & Hampshire, A. (2016) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.07.031 · Cited by 83
Yan, X., Kong, R., Xue, A., Yang, Q., Orbán, C., An, L., Holmes, A. J., Qian, X., Chen, J., Zuo, X., et al. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120010 · Cited by 86
Nakagawa, T., Jirsa, V., Spiegler, A., McIntosh, A. R., & Deco, G. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.055 · Cited by 87
Self-citationProix, T., Spiegler, A., Schirner, M., Rothmeier, S., Ritter, P., & Jirsa, V. (2016) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.06.016 · Cited by 86
Batallé, D., Edwards, A. D., & O’Muircheartaigh, J. (2017) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/jcpp.12838 · Cited by 92
Petkoski, S., Palva, J. M., & Jirsa, V. (2018) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006160 · Cited by 88
The future of human behaviour research
Box‐Steffensmeier, J. M., Burgess, J., Corbetta, M., Crawford, K., Duflo, E., Fogarty, L., Alison Gopnik, C., Ḥanafī, S., Herrero, M., Hong, Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01275-6 · Cited by 89
Self-citationBrainstem Modulation of Large-Scale Intrinsic Cortical Activity Correlations
van den Brink, R. L., Pfeffer, T. A., & Donner, T. H. (2019) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2019.00340 · Cited by 85
Catecholaminergic Neuromodulation Shapes Intrinsic MRI Functional Connectivity in the Human Brain
van den Brink, R. L., Pfeffer, T. A., Warren, C. M., Murphy, P. R., Tona, K., van der Wee, N. J. A., Giltay, E. J., van Noorden, M. S., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Donner, T. H., et al. (2016) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0744-16.2016 · Cited by 82
Spontaneous Beta Band Rhythms in the Predictive Coding of Natural Stimuli
Betti, V., Penna, S. D., de Pasquale, F., & Corbetta, M. (2020) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858420928988 · Cited by 97
Self-citationAnticevic, A., Cole, M. W., Repovš, G., Savić, A., Driesen, N. R., Yang, G., Cho, Y., Murray, J. D., Glahn, D. C., Wang, X., et al. (2013) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2013.00169 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Deco, G., Ponce-Alvarez, A., Mantini, D., Romani, G. L., Hagmann, P., & Corbetta, M.
- Affiliations
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats (ES)
- ETH Zurich (CH)
- University of Chieti-Pescara (IT)
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CH)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2013-07-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 27
- Pages
- 11239-11252
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC3718368
- OpenAlex
- W2127186958
- Cited by
- 576
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 43 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 58 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 8
- FWCI
- 21.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- IRIS (submittedVersion)
- Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
- Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- UPCommons institutional repository (Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion)
- ETH Zürich Research Collection
- Funders
- James S. McDonnell Foundation
- Fondation Leenaards
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH096482)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD061117)
- FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (295129)
- FP7 Information and Communication Technologies
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- resting-state functional connectivity, structure-function relationship, noise propagation, statistical moments, neural dynamics, brain network dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Action Potentials, Adult, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Nerve Net, Rest, Linear Models, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
