The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Double Dissociation between the Effects of Peri-Postrhinal Cortex and Hippocampal Lesions on Tests of Object Recognition and Spatial Memory: Heterogeneity of Function within the Temporal Lobe
Open accessAbstract
It is widely believed that declarative memory is mediated by a medial temporal lobe memory system consisting of several distinct structures, including the hippocampus and perirhinal cortex. The strong version of this view assumes a high degree of functional homogeneity and serial organization within the medial temporal lobe, such that double dissociations between individual structures should not be possible. In the present study, we tested for a functional double dissociation between the hippocampus and peri-postrhinal cortex in a single experiment. Rats with bilateral excitotoxic lesions of either the hippocampus or peri-postrhinal cortex were assessed in tests of spatial memory (radial maze) and object recognition memory. For the latter, the spontaneous object recognition task was conducted in a modified apparatus designed to minimize the potentially confounding influence of spatial and contextual factors. A clear functional double dissociation was observed: rats with hippocampal lesions were impaired relative to controls and those with peripostrhinal cortex lesions on the spatial memory task, whereas rats with peri-postrhinal lesions were impaired relative to the hippocampal and control groups in object recognition. These results provide strong evidence in favor of heterogeneity and independence of function within the temporal lobe.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Rat Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates
(1982) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-63235-9 · Cited by 51,963
(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010
AChE-stained horizontal sections of the rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates
Paxinos, G., Watson, C. R. R., & Emson, P. C. (1980) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/0165-0270(80)90021-7 · Cited by 4,497
Paxinos, G. (1985) · Cited by 3,715
The Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System
Squire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1896849 · Cited by 3,282
A new one-trial test for neurobiological studies of memory in rats. 1: behavioral data
Ennaceur, A., & Delacour, J. (1988) · Behavioural Brain Research · doi:10.1016/0166-4328(88)90157-x · Cited by 3,223
Episodic memory, amnesia, and the hippocampal–anterior thalamic axis
Aggleton, J. P., & Brown, M. W. (1999) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x99002034 · Cited by 1,879
Recognition memory: What are the roles of the perirhinal cortex and hippocampus?
Brown, M. W., & Aggleton, J. P. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35049064 · Cited by 1,580
Two functional components of the hippocampal memory system
Eichenbaum, H., Otto, T., & Cohen, N. J. (1994) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00035391 · Cited by 1,102
From Conditioning to Conscious Recollection
Eichenbaum, H., & Cohen, N. J. (2004) · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195178043.001.0001 · Cited by 1,026
Cited by
The Medial Temporal Lobe and Recognition Memory
Eichenbaum, H., Yonelinas, A. P., & Ranganath, C. (2007) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.30.051606.094328 · Cited by 2,580
Spatial memory, recognition memory, and the hippocampus
Broadbent, N. J., Squire, L. R., & Clark, R. E. (2004) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0406344101 · Cited by 985
The pharmacology, neuroanatomy and neurogenetics of one-trial object recognition in rodents
Dere, E., Huston, J. P., & De Souza Silva, M. A. (2007) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2007.01.005 · Cited by 675
Object recognition memory and the rodent hippocampus
Broadbent, N. J., Gaskin, S., Squire, L. R., & Clark, R. E. (2010) · Learning & Memory · doi:10.1101/lm.1650110 · Cited by 568
Object recognition memory: Neurobiological mechanisms of encoding, consolidation and retrieval
Winters, B. D., Saksida, L. M., & Bussey, T. J. (2008) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.04.004 · Cited by 572
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Winters, B. D., Forwood, S. E., Cowell, R. A., Saksida, L. M., & Bussey, T. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2004-06-30
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 26
- Pages
- 5901-5908
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W2160212383
- Cited by
- 586
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 10.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Double Dissociation between the Effects of Peri-Postrhinal Cortex and Hippocampal Lesions on Tests of Object Recognition and Spatial Memory: Heterogeneity of Function within the Temporal Lobe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.1346-04.2004
- The paper
- Winters, B. D., Forwood, S. E., Cowell, R. A., Saksida, L. M., & Bussey, T. J. (2004). Double Dissociation between the Effects of Peri-Postrhinal Cortex and Hippocampal Lesions on Tests of Object Recognition and Spatial Memory: Heterogeneity of Function within the Temporal Lobe. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1346-04.2004
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.