The DOI matches its Crossref record; 127 of the 127 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Basal forebrain lesions in monkeys disrupt attention but not learning and memory [published erratum appears in J Neurosci 1995 Mar;15(3): following table of contents]
Open accessAbstract
Cognitive impairments in humans and animals have been linked to dysfunction of neurons in the basal forebrain cholinergic system (BFCS). Degeneration of these cells may be, in part, responsible for some of the cognitive deficits observed in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Although memory deficits are associated with lesions of the BFCS in rats, impairments in memory have been more subtle following similar lesions in monkeys. To evaluate the effects of BFCS lesions on cognitive processes in monkeys, we have systematically investigated the behavioral effects of ibotenic acid injections in the medial septum, nucleus of the diagonal band of Broca, and nucleus basalis of Meynert in cynomolgus monkeys, using a large series of cognitive tasks that examined different mnemonic and attentional abilities. These lesions did not impair accuracy in delayed nonmatching-to-sample, delayed response, simple or concurrent visual discriminations, spatial discriminations, or discrimination reversals. However, these lesions disrupted attentional focusing. Similar impairments in attention have been noted in patients with AD. BFCS lesions increased sensitivity to injections of the cholinergic antagonist scopolamine in a delayed nonmatching-to-sample task, indicating that the central cholinergic system was compromised in these monkeys. In concert, the results of this study suggest that the primate basal forebrain may be more involved in attentional than mnemonic processes, and that degeneration of neurons in the BFCS in cases of AD may contribute to the attention deficits observed in these individuals.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Posner, M. I. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/00335558008248231 · Cited by 9,670 · cited 1×
“Difference in speed of responding to a target at expected (valid trials) and unexpected (invalid trials) locations is a measure of shifting attention (Posner, 1980; Posner and Cohen, 1984; Posner et al., 1984).”
BackgroundThe cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction
Bartus, R. T., Dean, R. L., Beer, B., & Lippa, A. S. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7046051 · Cited by 5,545
Alzheimer's Disease and Senile Dementia: Loss of Neurons in the Basal Forebrain
Whitehouse, P., Price, D., Struble, R., Clark, A., Coyle, J., & DeLong, M. R. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7058341 · Cited by 3,627
Self-citationA "DIRECT-COLORING" THIOCHOLINE METHOD FOR CHOLINESTERASES
KARNOVSKY, M. J., & ROOTS, L. (1964) · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · doi:10.1177/12.3.219 · Cited by 3,367
The Medial Temporal Lobe Memory System
Squire, L. R., & Zola-Morgan, S. (1991) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1896849 · Cited by 3,282
Alzheimer's Disease: A Disorder of Cortical Cholinergic Innervation
Coyle, J. T., Price, D. L., & DeLong, M. R. (1983) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.6338589 · Cited by 3,052
Self-citationEffects of parietal injury on covert orienting of attention
Posner, M., Walker, J., Friedrich, F., & Rafal, R. (1984) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.04-07-01863.1984 · Cited by 2,191
Stuss, D. T., & Benson, D. F. (1986) · Raven Press eBooks · Cited by 2,101
Mesulam, M. ‐., Mufson, E. J., Levey, A. I., & Wainer, B. H. (1983) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902140206 · Cited by 1,962
Arnold, S. E., Hyman, B. T., Flory, J., Damasio, A. R., & Van Hoesen, G. W. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.103 · Cited by 1,380
Cited by
The attention system of the human brain: 20 years after
Petersen, S. E., & Posner, M. I. (2012) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150525 · Cited by 3,439
Uncertainty, Neuromodulation, and Attention
Yu, A. J., & Dayan, P. (2005) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.04.026 · Cited by 1,774
Alzheimer's disease: Targeting the Cholinergic System
H. Ferreira-Vieira, T., M. Guimaraes, I., R. Silva, F., & M. Ribeiro, F. (2016) · Current Neuropharmacology · doi:10.2174/1570159x13666150716165726 · Cited by 1,551
Attention, uncertainty, and free-energy
Feldman, H., & Friston, K. J. (2010) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2010.00215 · Cited by 1,365
CENTRAL CHOLINERGIC SYSTEMS AND COGNITION
Everitt, B. J., & Robbins, T. W. (1997) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.649 · Cited by 1,348
Metadata
- Authors
- Voytko, M., Olton, D., Richardson, R., Gorman, L., Tobin, Jr., & Price, D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1994-01-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 167-186
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1516658808
- Cited by
- 483
- References
- 127
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Basal forebrain lesions in monkeys disrupt attention but not learning and memory [published erratum appears in J Neurosci 1995 Mar;15(3): following table of contents]. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.14-01-00167.1994
- The paper
- Voytko, M., Olton, D., Richardson, R., Gorman, L., Tobin, Jr., & Price, D. (1994). Basal forebrain lesions in monkeys disrupt attention but not learning and memory [published erratum appears in J Neurosci 1995 Mar;15(3): following table of contents]. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.14-01-00167.1994
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.