Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 504

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel classes of responsive and unresponsive C nociceptors in human skin

Open access
Schmidt, R, Schmelz, M, Forster, C, Ringkamp, M, Torebjork, E, Handwerker, H·1995·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

One hundred ninety-four cutaneous C-fibers were recorded from the human peroneal nerve; 118 units were found by mechanical stimuli and 76 units were detected by electrical stimulation through a surface electrode. Needle electrodes were then inserted for electrical intradermal stimulation in the innervation territory of the units. Afferent and efferent sympathetic C-fibers were identified by slowing of conduction velocity after activation either by physical or chemical skin stimuli, or by arousal maneuvers eliciting sympathetic reflexes. In addition to mechano-heat-responsive C units (CMH) also found in previous studies, we here report on novel classes of C nociceptors in human skin, namely, units responding only to mechanical stimuli (CM), units responding only to heating (CH), and units that were insensitive to mechanical and heating stimuli and also to sympathetic provocation tests (CMiHi). With the electrical search technique we found 45% CMH, 13% CM, 6% CH, 24% CMiHi, and 12% sympathetic units. Excitation by topically applied mustard oil occurred in 58% of CMH units, and in one-third of CM and CMiHi units, respectively. Some CM, CH, and CMiHi units were sensitized to heating and/or to mechanical stimuli after topical application of mustard oil or capsaicin. These units then acquired responsiveness to a stimulus modality to which they previously were insensitive. Such recruitment of previously silent nociceptors implies spatial summation to the nociceptive barrage at central levels, and may contribute both to primary hyperalgesia to heat and pressure after chemical irritation, and to secondary hyperalgesia as a consequence of central sensitization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.15-01-00333.1995

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 504

Metadata

Authors
Schmidt, R., Schmelz, M., Forster, C., Ringkamp, M., Torebjork, E., & Handwerker, H.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1995-01-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
333-341
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1845054049
Cited by
504
References
2
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Novel classes of responsive and unresponsive C nociceptors in human skin. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.15-01-00333.1995
The paper
Schmidt, R., Schmelz, M., Forster, C., Ringkamp, M., Torebjork, E., & Handwerker, H. (1995). Novel classes of responsive and unresponsive C nociceptors in human skin. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.15-01-00333.1995

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.