Cited by 117Tactile and Sensory InteractionsIon Channels and ReceptorsMotor Control and Adaptation

Receptor encoding of moving tactile stimuli in humans. I. Temporal pattern of discharge of individual low-threshold mechanoreceptors

Open access
Edin, BB, Essick, GK, Trulsson, M, Olsson, KA·1995·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The response of 70 cutaneous, low-threshold mechanoreceptors in the human median, radial and inferior alveolar nerves to well controlled brush stimuli moving across the receptive field was quantitatively studied. Microneurography was used to obtain the response of each to multiple velocities from 0.5 to 32 cm/sec in at least two opposing directions. A high degree of response consistency was observed from the slowly adapting receptors to replication of the same stimulus and to a lesser, but significant degree from the fast adapting receptors. The evoked discharge reflected up to three partially overlapping phases of the moving stimulus: skin compression, indentation, and stretch. Although the overall discharge rate increased with both stimulus velocity and force, the spatial discharge pattern was preserved to a high degrees. In contrast, the discharge patterns differed for opposing and orthogonal directions. Reducing the area of skin surrounding the receptive field that was contacted by the moving stimuli had little effect on the evoked response. Individual mechanoreceptors display highly reliable differences to brush stimuli moving at different velocities. to brush stimuli moving at different velocities. Moreover, different directions of movement evoke differences in the discharge that are consistently observed upon replication of the same stimuli. Despite the richness and consistency in the spatial discharge pattern displayed by individual receptors, it is argued that the details of the patterns are not likely used by the CNS to infer information about direction and velocity of movement across the skin. Rather, the intensity of discharge is proposed as a plausible information-bearing attribute of the stimulus-evoked response.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.15-01-00830.1995

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • For the hand dorsum and arm, we found a total of 267 reported afferents in the literature, 61% of which were slowly adapting.

    “For the hand dorsum and arm, we found a total of 267 reported afferents in the literature, 61% of which were slowly adapting (Ackerley et al. 2014;Edin and Abbs 1991;Edin et al. 1995;Kakuda 1992;Lo ¨ken et al. 2009;Nagi et al. 2019;Vallbo et al. 1995).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Edin et al. 1995

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Edin, B., Essick, G., Trulsson, M., & Olsson, K.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1995-01-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
830-847
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2171386063
Cited by
117
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Medical Research Council
  • Office of Naval Research
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (DE 07509)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
low-threshold mechanoreceptors, stimulus velocity, direction selectivity, slowly adapting receptors, receptive fields
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Male, Mechanoreceptors, Middle Aged, Motion Perception, Physical Stimulation, Sensory Receptor Cells, Sensory Thresholds, Skin, Time Factors, Touch

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review