Cited by 256Tactile and Sensory InteractionsIon Channels and ReceptorsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Mechanoreceptor activity from the human face and oral mucosa

Johansson, R. S., Trulsson, M., Olsson, K. Å., Westberg, K. -G.·1988·Experimental Brain Research

Abstract

The feasibility of adopting the microneurography technique (Vallbo and Hagbarth 1968) as a tool to investigate the mechanoreceptive innervation of peri- and intra-oral tissues was explored. Multi-unit activity and impulses in single nerve fibers were recorded from the infraorbital nerve in healthy volunteers. The innervation territories of individual nerve fascicles were mapped. These varied considerably but most fascicle fields comprised the corner of the mouth. Twenty-four single mechanoreceptive units were recorded. Eighteen innervated the skin of the face, and six innervated the mucous membranes of the lips or cheeks. A majority of the mechanoreceptive afferent units were slowly adapting with small and well defined receptive fields. It is suggested that the various slowly adapting responses may originate from two different types of afferent units. No afferents showed response properties similar to typical Pacinian-corpuscle afferents.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/bf00248518

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most receptive fields in facial skin have a circular or oval well-demarcated area of high and relatively uniform sensitivity.

    “Most receptive fields have a circular or oval well-demarcated area of high and relatively uniform sensitivity (Johansson et al. 1988).”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Johansson et al. 1988

  • The highest concentration and smallest size of receptive fields in facial skin are measured around the corner of the mouth and in the upper lip.

    “The highest concentration and smallest size of the receptive fields are measured around the corner of the mouth and in the upper lip.”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Johansson et al. 1988

  • Slowly adapting afferents appear more abundant than fast-adapting ones in facial skin, with around 65% SA resulting in 29,000 fibers and 35% FA resulting in 15,500 fibers.

    “Slowly adapting afferents appear more abundant than fastadapting ones in the facial skin (Bukowska et al. 2010;Johansson et al. 1988), with around 65% SA, resulting in 29,000 fibers, and 35% FA, resulting in 15,500 fibers.”

    From Tactile innervation densities across the whole body (2020) · cites this paper as Johansson et al. 1988

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Johansson, R. S., Trulsson, M., Olsson, K. Å., & Westberg, K. G.
Affiliations
Umeå University (SE)
Venue
Experimental Brain Research
Published
1988-08
Volume
72
Issue
1
Pages
204-208
ISSN
  • 0014-4819 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-1106
OpenAlex
W2064249042
Cited by
256
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 13
FWCI
3.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Experimental Brain Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Ion Channels and Receptors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
mechanoreceptors, oral mucosa, infraorbital nerve, microneurography, multi-unit activity, slowly adapting afferents, receptive fields, Pacinian corpuscles
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Adult, Face, Humans, Male, Maxillary Nerve, Mechanoreceptors, Middle Aged, Mouth Mucosa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review