Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 508

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dual somatotopical representations in the primate subthalamic nucleus: evidence for ordered but reversed body-map transformations from the primary motor cortex and the supplementary motor area

Open access
Nambu, A, Takada, M, Inase, M, Tokuno, H·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

The subthalamic nucleus (STN) is a key structure for somatic motor control via the basal ganglia. In the present study, we demonstrate that the STN of the macaque monkey has dual sets of body part representations. Each of the two separate portions of the STN is characterized with somatotopically arranged direct cortical inputs that are derived from the primary motor cortex (MI) and the supplementary motor area (SMA). The first set of body part representations is transformed from the MI to the lateral STN, whereas the second set is transformed from the SMA to the medial STN. Intracortical microstimulation mapping was carried out to guide paired injections of anterograde tracers into somatotopically corresponding regions of the MI and the SMA. We found that direct inputs from the MI were allocated mostly within the lateral half of the STN, whereas those from the SMA were distributed predominantly within its medial half. Of particular interest was that the arrangement of somatotopical representations from the SMA to the medial STN was reversed against the ordering of those from the MI to the lateral STN; the orofacial, forelimb, and hindlimb parts were represented from medial to lateral within the medial STN, whereas these body parts were represented, in the inverse order, mediolaterally within the lateral STN. Moreover, inputs from homotopical MI and SMA regions were found to converge only partially into the STN. The present findings could account for somatotopically specific involuntary movements manifested in hemiballism that is caused by destruction of the STN.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-08-02671.1996

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 508

Metadata

Authors
Nambu, A., Takada, M., Inase, M., & Tokuno, H.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-04-15
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
2671-2683
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1586994437
Cited by
508
References
3
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dual somatotopical representations in the primate subthalamic nucleus: evidence for ordered but reversed body-map transformations from the primary motor cortex and the supplementary motor area. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.16-08-02671.1996
The paper
Nambu, A., Takada, M., Inase, M., & Tokuno, H. (1996). Dual somatotopical representations in the primate subthalamic nucleus: evidence for ordered but reversed body-map transformations from the primary motor cortex and the supplementary motor area. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.16-08-02671.1996

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.