The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Restoration of Normal Conduction Properties in Demyelinated Spinal Cord Axons in the Adult Rat by Transplantation of Exogenous Schwann Cells
Open accessAbstract
Although remyelination of demyelinated CNS axons is known to occur after transplantation of exogenous glial cells, previous studies have not determined whether cell transplantation can restore the conduction properties of demyelinated axons in the adult CNS. To examine this issue, the dorsal columns of the adult rat spinal cord were demyelinated by x-irradiation and intraspinal injections of ethidium bromide. Cell suspensions of cultured astrocytes and Schwann cells derived from neonatal rats transfected with the (β-galactosidase) reporter gene were injected into the glial-free lesion site. After 3–4 weeks nearly all of the demyelinated axons were remyelinated by the transplanted Schwann cells. The dorsal columns were removed and maintained in an in vitro recording chamber; conduction properties were studied using field potential and intra-axonal recording techniques. The demyelinated axons exhibited conduction slowing and block, and a reduction in their ability to follow high-frequency stimulation. Axons remyelinated by transplantation of cultured Schwann cells exhibited restoration of conduction through the lesion, with reestablishment of normal conduction velocity. The axons remyelinated after transplantation showed enhanced impulse recovery to paired-pulse stimulation and greater frequency-following capability as compared with both demyelinated and control axons. These results demonstrate the functional repair of demyelinated axons in the adult CNS by transplantation of cultured myelin-forming cells from the peripheral nervous system in combination with astrocytes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biology of Oligodendrocyte and Myelin in the Mammalian Central Nervous System
Baumann, N., & Pham-Dinh, D. (2001) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.2001.81.2.871 · Cited by 1,828
Remyelination in the CNS: from biology to therapy
Franklin, R. J. M., & ffrench-Constant, C. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2480 · Cited by 1,544
Endogenous progenitors remyelinate demyelinated axons in the adult CNS
Gensert, J. M., & Goldman, J. E. (1997) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80359-1 · Cited by 544
Rabchevsky, A. G., Sullivan, P. G., & Scheff, S. W. (2007) · Glia · doi:10.1002/glia.20508 · Cited by 59
Ahn, Y. H., Bae Yeon, Y., Lee, G., Kang Mee, K., & Kang, S. K. (2006) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.07.105 · Cited by 55
How to Use the Cuprizone Model to Study De- and Remyelination
Kipp, M. (2024) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms25031445 · Cited by 37
“The positive effects of remyelination are widely recognized, including the reinstatement of impaired or lost axonal conduction [87], the provision of axonal protection, and functional recovery [88].”
BackgroundRemyelinating and neuroprotective treatments in multiple sclerosis
Stangel, M. (2004) · Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · doi:10.1517/13543784.13.4.331 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Honmou, O., Felts, P. A., Waxman, S. G., & Kocsis, J. D.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1996-05-15
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 3199-3208
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1948129507
- Cited by
- 249
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.