Cited by 258Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsNerve injury and regenerationNuclear Receptors and Signaling

Short-Term GDNF Treatment Provides Long-Term Rescue of Lesioned Nigral Dopaminergic Neurons in a Rat Model of Parkinson’s Disease

Open access
Winkler, Christian, Sauer, Hansjörg, Lee, Chong S., Björklund, Anders·1996·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) has been shown to exert neuroprotective effects on dopamine (DA) neurons in vivo. Here we report long-term rescue of nigral DA neurons after delayed short-term GDNF administration in a rat lesion model that reproduces the slowly progressing degenerative process seen in Parkinson’s disease. GDNF injected close to the substantia nigra provided near-complete protection and persistent survival of the lesioned nigral neurons for at least 4 months after discontinuation of GDNF treatment. Long-term rescue of the nigral cells, however, was not accompanied by any significant reinnervation of the lesioned striatal target or any signs of functional recovery in either drug-induced or spontaneous motor behaviors. We conclude that not only preservation of the nigral DA neurons but also restoration of striatal DA function is necessary for functional recovery in the rat Parkinson model.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.16-22-07206.1996

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Winkler, C., Sauer, H., Lee, C. S., & Björklund, A.
Affiliations
  • Lund University (SE)
  • Genentech (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1996-11-15
Volume
16
Issue
22
Pages
7206-7215
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1795898662
Cited by
258
References
27
Citations by year
2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • European Science Foundation
  • Genentech
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nuclear Receptors and Signaling
Keywords
glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor, Parkinson's disease, substantia nigra, dopaminergic neurons, neuroprotection, neuronal survival, striatal reinnervation, functional recovery, motor behavior, rat model
MeSH terms
Amphetamine, Animals, Antibody Specificity, Behavior, Animal, Disease Models, Animal, Dopamine, Postural Balance, Female, Motor Activity, Movement, Nerve Growth Factors, Nerve Regeneration, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neurons, Parkinson Disease, Secondary, Rotation, Substantia Nigra, Time Factors, Tyrosine 3-Monooxygenase, Dopamine Agents, Oxidopamine, Cell Death, Neostriatum, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Presynaptic Terminals, Neuroprotective Agents, Glial Cell Line-Derived Neurotrophic Factor, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review