Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 649

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-Affinity Zinc Inhibition of NMDA NR1–NR2A Receptors

Open access
Paoletti, Pierre, Ascher, Philippe, Neyton, Jacques·1997·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Micromolar concentrations of extracellular Zn 2+are known to antagonize native NMDA receptors via a dual mechanism involving both a voltage-independent and a voltage-dependent inhibition. We have tried to evaluate the relative importance of these two effects and their subunit specificity on recombinant NMDA receptors expressed in HEK 293 cells and Xenopus oocytes. The comparison of NR1a–NR2A and NR1a–NR2B receptors shows that the voltage-dependent inhibition is similar in both types of receptors but that the voltage-independent inhibition occurs at much lower Zn 2+concentrations in NR1a–NR2A receptors (IC 50 in the nanomolar range) than in NR1a–NR2B receptors (IC 50 in the micromolar range). The high affinity of the effect observed with NR1a–NR2A receptors was found to be attributable mostly to the slow dissociation of Zn 2+from its binding site. By analyzing the effects of Zn 2+on varied combinations of NR1 (NR1a or NR1b) and NR2 (NR2A, NR2B, NR2C), we show that both the NR1 and the NR2 subunits contribute to the voltage-independent Zn 2+inhibition. We have observed further that under control conditions, i.e., in zero nominal Zn 2+solutions, the addition of low concentrations of heavy metal chelators markedly potentiates the responses of NR1a–NR2A receptors, but not of NR1a–NR2B receptors. This result suggests that traces of a heavy metal (probably Zn 2+) contaminate standard solutions and tonically inhibit NR1a–NR2A receptors. Chelation of a contaminant metal also could account for the rapid NR2A subunit-specific potentiations produced by reducing compounds like DTT or glutathione.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.17-15-05711.1997

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

See all 649

Metadata

Authors
Paoletti, P., Ascher, P., & Neyton, J.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
17
Issue
15
Pages
5711-5725
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1656913045
Cited by
649
References
63
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: High-Affinity Zinc Inhibition of NMDA NR1–NR2A Receptors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.17-15-05711.1997
The paper
Paoletti, P., Ascher, P., & Neyton, J. (1997). High-Affinity Zinc Inhibition of NMDA NR1–NR2A Receptors. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.17-15-05711.1997

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.