Cited by 938Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Glutamate-mediated excitotoxicity and neurodegeneration in Alzheimer?s disease

HYND, M·2004·Neurochemistry International

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is the most common form of dementia, accounting for 60-70% of cases in subjects over 65 years of age. Several postulates have been put forward that relate AD neuropathology to intellectual and functional impairment. These range from free-radical-induced damage, through cholinergic dysfunction, to beta-amyloid-induced toxicity. However, therapeutic strategies aimed at improving the cognitive symptoms of patients via choline supplementation, cholinergic stimulation or beta-amyloid vaccination, have largely failed. A growing body of evidence suggests that perturbations in systems using the excitatory amino acid L-glutamate (L-Glu) may underlie the pathogenic mechanisms of (e.g.) hypoxia-ischemia, epilepsy, and chronic neurodegenerative disorders such as Huntington's disease and AD. Almost all neurons in the CNS carry the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) subtype of ionotropic L-glutamate receptors, which can mediate post-synaptic Ca2+ influx. Excitotoxicity resulting from excessive activation of NMDA receptors may enhance the localized vulnerability of neurons in a manner consistent with AD neuropathology, as a consequence of an altered regional distribution of NMDA receptor subtypes. This review discusses mechanisms for the involvement of the NMDA receptor complex and its interaction with polyamines in the pathogenesis of AD. NMDA receptor antagonists have potential for the therapeutic amelioration of AD.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuint.2004.03.007

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
HYND, M.
Affiliations
The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
HYND, M
Venue
Neurochemistry International
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-10
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
583-595
ISSN
0197-0186 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2166070786
Cited by
938
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 59 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 35 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 46 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 49
FWCI
21.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurochemistry International (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, excitotoxicity, glutamate, NMDA receptor, neurodegeneration, polyamines, NMDA receptor antagonists, calcium influx, amyloid-beta, cholinergic dysfunction, glutamate receptor subtypes
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Humans, Nerve Degeneration, Synaptic Transmission, Biogenic Polyamines, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Glutamic Acid, Excitatory Amino Acids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review