Cited by 184Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments

Differential Autoreceptor Control of Somatodendritic and Axon Terminal Dopamine Release in Substantia Nigra, Ventral Tegmental Area, and Striatum

Open access
Cragg, Stephanie J., Greenfield, Susan A.·1997·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Dopamine (DA) is released from somatodendritic sites of neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc) and ventral tegmental area (VTA), where it has neuromodulatory effects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of D 2 autoreceptor inhibition in the regulation of this somatodendritic release in each region. Fast cyclic voltammetry at carbon fiber microelectrodes was used to measure electrically evoked DA release in vitro. Furthermore, we compared D 2 regulation of somatodendritic release with the more familiar axon terminal release in caudate putamen (CPu) and nucleus accumbens (NAc). Evoked DA release was TTX-sensitive at all sites. There was significant D 2 autoinhibition of DA release in SNc; however, this mechanism was two- to threefold less powerful, as compared with axon terminal release in CPu. In contrast to SNc, somatodendritic release in VTA was not under significant D 2 receptor control, whereas release in the respective axon terminal region (NAc) was controlled strongly by autoinhibition. Thus, these data indicate that, first, autoinhibition via D 2 receptors consistently plays a less significant role in the control of somatodendritic than axon terminal DA release, and, second, even at the level of somatodendrites themselves, D 2 autoinhibition displays marked regional variation. In the light of previous data indicating that DA uptake processes are also less active in somatodendritic than in terminal regions, these results are interpreted as indicating that DA transmission is regulated differently in somatodendritic zones, as compared with axon terminals, and thus may have different functional consequences.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.17-15-05738.1997

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The release of dopamine by SNc DA neurons can act on somatodendritic D2 receptors, thereby inhibiting dopamine release at DA axonal terminals in the striatum.

    “previous studies have shown that the release of dopamine by SNc DA neurons can act on somatodendritic D2 receptors, thereby inhibiting dopamine release at DA axonal terminals in the striatum (Cragg and Greenfield 1997; Hikima et al. 2021; Sulzer et al. 2016).”

    From Mitochondrial DNA Damage in Substantia Nigra Pars Compacta Astrocytes Exacerbates Dopaminergic Neuron Loss in a 6-Hydroxydopamine Mouse Model of Parkinsonism (2026) · cites this paper as Cragg and Greenfield 1997

    The ‘D2 receptor modulation of somatodendritic DA release in SNc’ section reports that D2 receptors autoinhibit dopamine release in the SNc. The ‘D2 receptor control of axon terminal DA release’ section separately reports D2 inhibition of release at striatal terminals. Neither passage shows that dopamine acting on somatodendritic D2 receptors inhibits release at those terminals; the paper compares the two sites rather than establishing that causal link. Page numbers are not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Cuello AC (1982) Storage and release of amines, amino acids, and peptides from dendrites. In: Chemical transmission in the brain, progress in brain research, Vol 55 (Buijes RM, Pevet P, Sqab DF, eds), pp 205-224. New York: Elsevier.
  2. Rice M E, Nicholson C (1995) Diff usion and ion shifts in the brain extracellular microenvironment and their relevance for voltammetric measurements. Neuromethods. In: Voltammetric methods in brain sys- tems, Vol 27 (Boulton A, Baker G, Adams RN, eds), pp 27-79. New York: Wiley.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cragg, S. J., & Greenfield, S. A.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1997-08-01
Volume
17
Issue
15
Pages
5738-5746
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1803352854
Cited by
184
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
dopamine release, D2 autoreceptors, substantia nigra pars compacta, ventral tegmental area, caudate-putamen, nucleus accumbens, striatum, dopamine uptake, neuromodulation
MeSH terms
Animals, Axons, Corpus Striatum, Dendrites, Dopamine, Guinea Pigs, Male, Substantia Nigra, Tegmentum Mesencephali, Autoreceptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review