Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 359

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Modulation of Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex after Forearm Ischemic Nerve Block

Open access
Ziemann, Ulf, Corwell, Brian, Cohen, Leonardo G.·1998·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Deafferentation leads to cortical reorganization that may be functionally beneficial or maladaptive. Therefore, we were interested in learning whether it is possible to purposely modulate deafferentation-induced reorganization. Transient forearm deafferentation was induced by ischemic nerve block (INB) in healthy volunteers. The following five interventions were tested: INB alone; INB plus low-frequency (0.1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the motor cortex ipsilateral to INB (INB+rTMS i); rTMS i alone; INB plus rTMS of the motor cortex contralateral to INB (INB+rTMS c); and rTMS c alone. Plastic changes in the motor cortex contralateral to deafferentation were probed with TMS, measuring motor threshold (MT), motor evoked-potential (MEP) size, and intracortical inhibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF) to the biceps brachii muscle proximal to the level of deafferentation. INB alone induced a moderate increase in MEP size, which was significantly enhanced by INB+rTMS c but blocked by INB+rTMS i. INB alone had no effect on ICI or ICF, whereas INB+rTMS c reduced ICI and increased ICF, and conversely, INB+rTMS i deepened ICI and suppressed ICF. rTMS i and rTMS c alone were ineffective in changing any of these parameters. These findings indicate that the deafferented motor cortex becomes modifiable by inputs that are normally subthreshold for inducing changes in excitability. The deafferentation-induced plastic changes can be up-regulated by direct stimulation of the “plastic” cortex and likely via inhibitory projections down-regulated by stimulation of the opposite cortex. This modulation of cortical plasticity by noninvasive means might be used to facilitate plasticity when it is primarily beneficial or to suppress it when it is predominately maladaptive.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.18-03-01115.1998

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 359

Metadata

Authors
Ziemann, U., Corwell, B., & Cohen, L. G.
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
1998-02-01
Volume
18
Issue
3
Pages
1115-1123
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W1565295636
Cited by
359
References
6
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Modulation of Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex after Forearm Ischemic Nerve Block. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-03-01115.1998
The paper
Ziemann, U., Corwell, B., & Cohen, L. G. (1998). Modulation of Plasticity in Human Motor Cortex after Forearm Ischemic Nerve Block. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-03-01115.1998

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.