The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Refractoriness and Neural Precision
Open accessAbstract
The response of a spiking neuron to a stimulus is often characterized by its time-varying firing rate, estimated from a histogram of spike times. If the cell’s firing probability in each small time interval depends only on this firing rate, one predicts a highly variable response to repeated trials, whereas many neurons show much greater fidelity. Furthermore, the neuronal membrane is refractory immediately after a spike, so that the firing probability depends not only on the stimulus but also on the preceding spike train. To connect these observations, we investigated the relationship between the refractory period of a neuron and its firing precision. The light response of retinal ganglion cells was modeled as probabilistic firing combined with a refractory period: the instantaneous firing rate is the product of a “free firing rate,” which depends only on the stimulus, and a “recovery function,” which depends only on the time since the last spike. This recovery function vanishes for an absolute refractory period and then gradually increases to unity. In simulations, longer refractory periods were found to make the response more reproducible, eventually matching the precision of measured spike trains. Refractoriness, although often thought to limit the performance of neurons, may in fact benefit neuronal reliability. The underlying free firing rate derived by allowing for the refractory period often exceeded the observed firing rate by an order of magnitude and was found to convey information about the stimulus over a much wider dynamic range. Thus, the free firing rate may be the preferred variable for describing the response of a spiking neuron.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Mathematical Theory of Communication
Shannon, C. E. (1948) · Bell System Technical Journal · doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1948.tb01338.x · Cited by 88,486
Hodgkin, A. L., & Huxley, A. F. (1952) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.1952.sp004764 · Cited by 23,191
Ionic channels of excitable membranes
(1985) · General Pharmacology: The Vascular System · doi:10.1016/0306-3623(85)90172-7 · Cited by 6,982
Visual Feature Integration and the Temporal Correlation Hypothesis
Singer, W., & Gray, C. M. (1995) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.003011 · Cited by 3,123
Spikes: Exploring the Neural Code
Rieke, F. M., Warland, D., van Steveninck, R. R. D. R., & Bialek, W. (1996) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 2,844
Corticonics: Neural Circuits of the Cerebral Cortex
Abeles, M. (1991) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511574566 · Cited by 1,345
Noise, neural codes and cortical organization
Shadlen, M. N., & Newsome, W. T. (1994) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/0959-4388(94)90059-0 · Cited by 1,252
Entropy and information in neural spike trains
Strong, S. P., Koberle, R., de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R., & Bialek, W. (1998) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.80.197 · Cited by 791
Reproducibility and Variability in Neural Spike Trains
de Ruyter van Steveninck, R. R., Lewen, G. D., Strong, S. P., Koberle, R., & Bialek, W. (1997) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.275.5307.1805 · Cited by 702
The identification of nonlinear biological systems: Wiener and Hammerstein cascade models
Hunter, I. W., & Korenberg, M. J. (1986) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00341929 · Cited by 639
Cited by
Faisal, A. A., Selen, L. P. J., & Wolpert, D. M. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2258 · Cited by 2,883
Differential attention-dependent response modulation across cell classes in macaque visual area V4
Mitchell, J. F., Sundberg, K. A., & Reynolds, J. H. (2007) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.06.018 · Cited by 665
Fast and Slow Contrast Adaptation in Retinal Circuitry
Baccus, S. A., & Meister, M. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)01050-4 · Cited by 515
Self-citationMaximum likelihood estimation of cascade point-process neural encoding models
Paninski, L. (2004) · Network: Computation in Neural Systems · doi:10.1088/0954-898x/15/4/002 · Cited by 481
Space–time wiring specificity supports direction selectivity in the retina
EyeWirers, T., Kim, J. S., Greene, M. J., Zlateski, A., Lee, K., Richardson, M., Turaga, S. C., Purcaro, M., Balkam, M., Robinson, A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13240 · Cited by 450
Metadata
- Authors
- Berry, M. J., & Meister, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 1998-03-15
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2200-2211
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- OpenAlex
- W1694767778
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 10.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Refractoriness and Neural Precision. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1523/jneurosci.18-06-02200.1998
- The paper
- Berry, M. J., & Meister, M. (1998). Refractoriness and Neural Precision. The Journal of Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.18-06-02200.1998
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.